Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:39:06.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breaking with Austrian Consociationalism: How the Rise of Rightwing Populism and Party Competition Have Changed Austria's Islam Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2018

Farid Hafez  and
Reinhard Heinisch
Farid Hafez*
Affiliation:
University of Salzburg
Reinhard Heinisch
Affiliation:
University of Salzburg
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Farid Hafez, University of Salzburg. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper seeks to explain Austria's Islam-related politics by first suggesting that it can be best understood in terms of neo-institutionalist path-dependency and consociationalist policy-making. This is due to the fact that Austria gave Islam full legal recognition in 1912. Important institutional patterns and policies grew out of this law in the Second Republic, whose persistence we want to examine. The Islamic Religious Community constituted itself under public law as a neo-corporatist interest group for Muslims in Austria in 1979. More recently, the government's approach toward Islam has shifted. This change can be best accounted for by party competition in which the far-right Freedom Party of Austria has sought to monopolize this issue. Consequently, this paper explores the contradictions between, on the one hand, the long-established principle of state neutrality and evenhandedness when dealing with various legally recognized religious communities and, on the other hand, discriminatory Islam-related politics.

Type
Article
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 649 - 678
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bale, Tim. 2003. “Cinderella and Her Ugly Sister: The Mainstream and Extreme Right in Europe's Bipolarising Party System.” West European Politics 26(3):67–90.Google Scholar
Biegelbauer, Peter, and Grießler, Erich. 2009. “Politische Praktiken von MinisterialbeamtInnen im österreichischen Gesetzgebungsprozess.” Austrian Journal of Political Science (ÖZP) 38:61–78.Google Scholar
Bruckmüller, Ernst. 1994. Österreichbewusstsein im Wandel. Identität und Selbstverständnis in the 90er Jahren. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Crepaz, Markus L. 1994. “From Semisovereignty to Sovereignty: The Decline of Corporatism and Rise of Parliament in Austria.” Comparative Politics 27(1):45–65.Google Scholar
Dautović, Rijad, and Hafez, Farid. 2015. “MuslimInnen als BürgerInnen Zweiter Klasse? Eine Vergleichende Analyse des Entwurfes Eines Neuen Islamgesetzes 2014 zum Restlichen Religionsrecht.” Islamophobia Studies Yearbook, ed. Hafez, Farid. Vienna: New Academic Press, 26–54.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Joel S., and Soper, J. Christopher. 2005. Muslims and the State in Britain, France, and Germany. ed. Hafez, Farid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friesl, Christian, Regina, Polak, and Hamachers-Zuba, Ursula. eds. 2009. Die ÖsterreicherInnen: Wertewandel 1990–2008. Vienna: Czernin.Google Scholar
Gerlich, Peter, and Pfefferle, Roman. 2006. “Tradition und Wandel.” In Politik in Österreich, eds. Herbert, Dachs, Gerlich, Peter, Gottweis, Herbert, Kramer, Helmut, Lauber, Volkmar, Müller, Wolfgang C and Tálos, Emmerich. Vienna: Manz, 501–511.Google Scholar
Hafez, Farid. 2009. “Zwischen Islamophobie und Islamophilie.” In Islamophobie in Österreich, eds. John, Bunzl and Hafez, Farid. Bozen/Innsbruck/Vienna: Studien Verlag, 105–125.Google Scholar
Hafez, Farid. 2010a. “Österreich und der Islam. Eine Wende Durch FPÖVP?.” In Die Beschämte Republik. 10 Jahre Nach Schwarz-Blau in Österreich, eds. Frederick, Baker, and Herczeg, Petra. Vienna: Czernin, 130–141.Google Scholar
Hafez, Farid. 2010b. Islamophober Populismus: Moschee- und Minarettbauverbote österreichischer Parlamentsparteien. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Hafez, Farid. 2012. Anas Schakfeh. Das österreichische Gesicht des Islams. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Hafez, Farid. 2014a. “Gedenken im Islamischen Gedankenjahr. Zur Diskursiven Konstruktion des österreichischen Islams im Rahmen der Jubiläumsfeier zu 100 Jahren Islamgesetz.” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlands 104:63–84.Google Scholar
Hafez, Farid. 2014b. “Institutionalized Islamophobia. The Draft of the Austrian Islam Act.” SETA Perspective 14, www.file.setav.org/Files/Pdf/20141031184033_14_perspective_farid_hafez.pdf (Accessed on 31, May 2017).Google Scholar
Hafez, Farid. 2015a. “Das IslamG im Kontext Islamophober Diskurse: Eine Policy Frame-Analyse zum Politikgestaltungsprozess des IslamG 2015.” Juridikum 2:160–165.Google Scholar
Hafez, Farid. 2015b. “Die österreichische, Islam-Lehrer”-Studie. Mediale Berichterstattung und Politische Implikationen.” Islamophobia Studies Yearbook, ed. Hafez, Farid. Vienna: New Academic Press, 100–122.Google Scholar
Hafez, Farid. 2016. “Ostarrichislam. Gründe der Korporatistischen Hereinnahme des Islams in der Zweiten Republik.” Austrian Journal of Political Science (ÖZP) 45(2):1–11.Google Scholar
Hafez, Farid. 2017a. “Debating the 2015 Islam Act in Austrian Parliament: Between Legal Recognition and Islamophobic Populism.” Discourse & Society 28(4), 392–412.Google Scholar
Hafez, Farid. 2017b. ‘Austrian Muslims Protest Against Austria's Revised “Islam Act”’, Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 25:1–17.Google Scholar
Hafez, Kai. 2002. Die Politische Dimension der Auslandsberichterstattung: Das Nahost-und Islambild der Deutschen überregionalen Presse. Vol. 2. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter. A., and Taylor, Rosemary. C.R.. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44(5):936–957.Google Scholar
Hauptmann, Ferdinand. 1985. “Die Mohammedaner in Bosnien-Herzegovina.” In Die Habsburgermonarchie 1848–1918. Band 4: Konfessionen, eds. Adam, Wandruschka and Urbanitsch, Peter. Vienna: VÖAW, 670–701.Google Scholar
Heine, Susanne, Lohlker, Rüdiger, and Potz, Richard. 2012. Muslime in Österreich: Geschichte—Lebenswelt—Religion. Grundlagen für den Dialog. Innsbruck/Vienna: Tirolia Verlag.Google Scholar
Heinisch, Reinhard. 1999. “Modernization Brokers—Austrian Corporatism in Search of A New Legitimacy.” Current Politics and Economics of Europe 9(1):65–94.Google Scholar
Heinisch, Reinhard. 2002. Populism, Proporz, Pariah: Austria Turns Right: Austrian Political Change, its Causes and Repercussions. New York: Nova Science.Google Scholar
Heinisch, Reinhard, and Kristina, Hauser. 2016. “The Mainstreaming of the Austrian Freedom Party: The More Things Change…” In Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Into the Mainstream? eds. Tjitski, Akkerman, De Lange, Sarah and Rooduijn, Matthijs. London: Routedge, 46–62.Google Scholar
Hödl, Klaus. 2010. “Islamophobia in Austria: The Recent Emergence of Anti-Muslim Sentiments in the Country.” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 30(4):443–456.Google Scholar
Howard, Wiarda J. 1996. American Foreign Policy. Actors and Process. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.Google Scholar
Jenny, Marcelo. 2011. “Austria.” European Journal of Political Research Political Data Yearbook 50:907–908.Google Scholar
Karlhofer, Ferdinand and Tálos, Emmerich, eds. 1999. Zukunft der Sozialpartnerschaft. Vienna: Signum-Verlag.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter 1976. Disjoined Partners; Austria and Germany Since 1815. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter 1984. Corporatism and Change: Austria, Switzerland and the Politics of Industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Khorchide, Mouhanad. 2009. Der Islamische Religionsunterricht Zwischen Integration und Parallelgesellschaft. Einstellungen der Islamischen ReligionslehrerInnen an öffentlichen Schulen. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard. 1984. “Österreichs Socialpartnerschaft im Internationale Vergleich.” In Methoden der Politikberatung im Wirtschaftspolitischen Bereich, eds. Sozialfragen, Beirat für Wirtschafts-und. Vienna: Bundesverlag, 41–62.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard 1985. “Sozialpartnerschaft in der Vergleichenden Politikforschung.” In Sozialpartnerschaft in der Krise; Leistungen und Grenzen des Neokorporatismus in Österreich Peter Gerlich, eds. Edgar, Grande and Müller, Wolfgang C.. Vienna: Böhlau, 41–83.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Luther, Kurth R. 2003. “The Self-Destruction of A Right-Wing Populist Party? The Austrian Parliamentary Election of 2002.” West European Politics 26(2):136–152.Google Scholar
Luther, Kurth R. 2008. “Electoral Strategies and Performance of Austrian Right-Wing Populism, 1986–2006.” In The Changing Austrian Voter (Contemporary Austrian Studies), eds. Günter, Bischof and Plasser, Fritz. New Brunswick N.J./London: Transaction Publishing, 101–122.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39(4):541–563.Google Scholar
Obinger, Herbert. 2002. “Veto Players, Political Parties, and Welfare-State Retrenchment in Austria.” International Journal of Political Economy 32(2):44–66.Google Scholar
Odmalm, Pontus. 2011. “Political Parties and ‘the Immigration Issue’: IssueOwnership in Swedish Parliamentary Elections 1991–2010.” West European Politics 34(5):1070–1091.Google Scholar
Paster, Thomas. 2013. “Why did Austrian Business Oppose Welfare Cuts? How the Organization of Interests Shapes.” Comparative Political Studies 47(1):966–992.Google Scholar
Peters, Guy B. 2001 [1999]. Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Plasser, Fritz, and Ulram, Peter A.. 1995. “Akzeptanz und Unterstützung Sozialpartnerschaftlicher Interessenvertretung in Österreich.” In Kammern auf dem Prüfstand: Vergleichende Analysen Institutioneller Funktionsbedingungen, eds. Anton, Pelinka, and Smekal, Christian. Vienna: Signum Verlag, 75–109.Google Scholar
Potz, Richard. 1996. “State and Church in Austria.” In State and Church in the European Union, eds. Gerhard, Robbers. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 229–258.Google Scholar
Potz, Richard, and Schinkele, Brigitte. 2016. Religion and Law in Austria. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Potz, Richard, Schinkele, Brigitte, and Wieshaider, Wolfgang, eds. 2001. Schächten. Religionsfreiheit und Tierschutz (Religionsrechtliche Studien). Hennef: R. Kovar.Google Scholar
Prainsack, Barbara. 2006. “Religion und Politik.” In Politik in Österreich, eds. Herbert, Dachs, Gelich, Peter, Gottweis, Herbert, Kramer, Helmut, Lauber, Volkmar, Müller, Wolfgang C. and Tálos, Emmerich. Vienna: Manz, 538–549.Google Scholar
Rosenberger, Sieglinde, and Mourão Permoser, Julia. 2012. “Religiöse Staatsbürgerschaft: Widersprüche der Governance von Diversität.” In Religion in Europa Heute. Sozialwissenschaftliche, Rechtswissenschaftliche und Hermeneutisch-Religionsphilosophische Perspektiven, eds. Appel, Kurt, Dan, Christian, Potz, Richard, Rosenberger, Sieglinde and Walser, Angelika. Vienna: Vienna University Press, 67–84.Google Scholar
Rovny, Jan. 2012. “Who Emphasizes and who Blurs? Party Strategies in Multidimensional Competition.” European Union Politics 13(2):269–292.Google Scholar
Said, Edward W. 1981. Covering Islam: How the Media and the Experts Determine how we see the Rest of the World. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Sauer, Birgit. 2016. “Gender and Citizenship: Governing Muslim Body Covering in Europe.” In Contemporary Encounters in Gender and Religion. New York: Springer International Publishing, 105–129.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz (1991). Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schmied, Martina, and Wieshaider, Wolfgang. 2004. “Islam and the European Union: The Austrian way.” In Islam and the European Union, eds. Richard, Potz & Wieshaider, Wolfgang. Leuven: Peeters, 199–217.Google Scholar
Skowron-Nalborczyk, Agata. 2015. “A Century of the Official Legal Status of Islam in Austria: Between the Law on Islam of 1912 and the Law on Islam of 2015.” In Muslim Minority-State Relations. Violence, Integration, and Policy, ed. Robert, Mason. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 61–82.Google Scholar
Sticker, Maja. 2008. Sondermodell Österreich? Die Islamische Glaubensgemeinschaft in Österreich. Klagenfurt: Drava Verlag.Google Scholar
Talos, Emmerich. 1993a. “Entwicklung, Kontinuität und Wandel der Sozialpartnerschaft.” In Sozialpartnerschaft: Kontinuität und Wandel Eines Modells, ed. Talos, E.. Vienna: Verlag für Gesellschaftskritik, 11–34.Google Scholar
Tálos, Emmerich, ed. 1993b. Sozialpartnerschaft. Kontinuität und Wandel Eines Modells. Vienna: Verlag für Gesellschaftskritik.Google Scholar
Tálos, Emmerich, and Kittel, Bernhard 2001. Gesetzgebung im Politischen System. Entscheidungsprozesse Zwischen Parlament, Regierung und Sozialpartnerschaft in Österreich. Vienna: Verlag für Gesellschaftskritik.Google Scholar
Traxler, Franz 1995. “From Demand-Side to Supply-Side Corporatism? Austria's Labour Relations and Public Policy.” In Organized Industrial Relations in Europe: What Future? eds. Crouch, Colin and Traxler, Franz. Aldershot: Avebury Ashgate Publishing, 271–285.Google Scholar
Vilimksy, Harald, ed. 2016. Sharia für Europa? Mögliche Langfristige Auswirkungen Einer Umfassenden Islamischen Immigration auf die Europäische Rechtsordnung Unter Besonderer Berücksichtigung Österreichs. Vienna: Foundation for a Europe of Nations and Freedom (FENF), 38.Google Scholar