Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:50:41.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quasi-Messianism and the Disenchantment of Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Kees van Kersbergen*
Affiliation:
VU University Amsterdam
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kees van Kersbergen, Department of Political Science, VU University, De Boelelaan 1081, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The study of political religion has focused on how religious structure and substance came to permeate grand political ideologies such as fascism and communism. The relevance of various relatively veiled forms of religion in modern day-to-day democratic politics has been undervalued and we therefore fail to appreciate to what extent, and how religious structure and substance have also penetrated conventional democratic politics. As a result, we do not comprehend that it is the progressive abolition of “quasi-messianism” in politics that is currently causing the existential problem of democracy, namely massive political disaffection. Quasi-messianism concerned the visionary anticipation of a better world that is attainable, here and in the distant, yet foreseeable future. This promise accorded politics an enchanting quality. Quite down-to-earth political ventures got charged with an inspiring and imaginative sense of purpose, direction, and meaning, but equally with this-worldly catalysts, which, in contrast to the political-religious grand utopias, were operational and practical. In this quality, some mass political projects or elite missions developed a capacity to enchant the political elite and the public alike. Hence the thesis that it is the disenchantment of politics, which lies at the heart of the contemporary phenomenon of waning political allegiance.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 1996. Une histoire du XXe siècle. Paris, France: Plon.Google Scholar
Bailey, Edward, 1998. Implicit Religion: An Introduction. London, UK: Middlesex University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellah, Robert. 2009. “This is Our Moment, This is Our Time.” http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2009/01/12/this-is-our-moment-this-is-our-time (Accessed on June 9, 2009).Google Scholar
Besecke, Kelly. 2005. “Seeing Invisible Religion: Religion as a Societal Conversation about Transcendent Meaning.” Sociological Theory 23:179196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Steve. 2003. Politics and Religion. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Burleigh, Michael. 2005. Earthly Powers. Religion and Politics in Europe from the Enlightenment to the Great War. London, UK: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Burrin, Philippe. 1997. “Political Religions. The Relevance of a Concept.” History & Memory 9:321349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casanova, José. 1994. Public Religions in the Moderns World. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Change.gov. (2009). “The Office of the President-Elect.” http://change.gov/agenda (Accessed on June 9, 2009).Google Scholar
Copulsky, Jerome E. 2009. “God in the Inauguration: JFK, Bush, and Obama.” http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/religionandtheology/1029/god_in_the_inauguration:_jfk,_bush,_and_obama (Accessed on June 9, 2009).Google Scholar
Crick, Bernard R. 1962. In Defence of Politics. London, UK: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
De Tocqueville, Alexis. 2000. Democracy in America, ed. and trans. by Mansfield, Harvey C., and Winthrop, Delba. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel. 2005. “The Transformation of the Religious Dimension in the Constitution of Contemporary Modernities.” In Religion and Politics: Cultural Perspectives, ed. Giesen, Bernhard, and Šuber, Daniel. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Ertman, Thomas. 2009. “Western European Party Systems and the Religious Cleavage.” In Religion, Class Coalitions and Welfare State Regimes, ed. van Kersbergen, Kees, and Manow, Philip. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrera, Maurizio. 2005. The Boundaries of Welfare: European Integration and the New Spatial Politics of Social Protection. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. 2008. “Undermining Democracy: 21st Century Authoritarians.” http://www.underminingdemocracy.org (Accessed on March 20, 2008).Google Scholar
Gray, John. 2007. Black Mass. Apocalyptic Religion and the Death of Utopia. London, UK: Penguin/Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Gunn, T. Jeremy. 2007. “Religion, Politics, and Law in the United States in Comparative Perspective.” In Politics and Religion in France and the United States, ed. Hargreaves, Alec G., Kelsay, John, and Twiss, Sumner B.. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 2000. “The Public Trust.” In Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries? ed. Pharr, Susan J., and Putnam, Robert D.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2007. Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald F. 2007. “The Worldviews of the Islamic Publics in Global Perspective.” In Values and Perceptions of the Islamic and Middle Eastern Publics, ed. Moaddel, Mansoor. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1996. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stahis N. 2003. “Unsecular Politics and Religious Mobilization: Beyond Christian Democracy.” In European Christian Democracy. Historical Legacies and Comparative Perspectives. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Kim, David K. 2009. “‘These Things are Old”: A New Discussion Series at The Immanent Frame.” http://www.ssrc.org/blogs/immanent_frame/2009/05/12/these-things-are-old-a-new-discussion-series-at-pthe-immanent-frame/ (Accessed on June 9, 2009).Google Scholar
King, Anthony, ed. 2002. Leaders’ Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Frank. 2008. Religion in American Politics: A Short History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy's Unresolved Dilemma.” American Political Science Review 91:114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilla, Mark. 2007. The Stillborn God. Religion, Politics, and the Modern West. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Lord, Karen. 2008. “Implicit Religion: A Contemporary Theory for the Relationships between Religion, State, and Society.” Journal of Contemporary Religion 23:3346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1982. The Differentiation of Society. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, Hans, ed. 2004. Totalitarianism and Political Religions: Concepts for the Comparison of Dictatorships, Vol. 1. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R., eds. 2003. Christian Democracy in Latin America: Electoral Competition and Regime Conflicts. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2006. “Ruling the Void? The Hollowing of Western Democracy.” New Left Review 42: 2551.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2008. “The Challenge to Party Government.” West European Politics 31:211234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milward, Alan S. 1997. “The Springs of Integration.” In The Question of Europe, ed. Gowan, Peter, and Anderson, Perry. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39:541563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puddington, Arch. 2007. “Freedom in the World 2007: Freedom Stagnation amid Pushback Against Democracy.” www.freedomhouse.org (Accessed on March 20, 2008).Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, John E. 1994. Quasi-Religions. Humanism, Marxism and Nationalism. Houndmills, NJ: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Garham. 2005. Beyond the Ballot: 57 Democratic Innovations from around the World (a Report for the Power Inquiry). London, UK: The Power Inquiry.Google Scholar
Stark, Rodney, and Bainbridge, William Sims. 1996. A Theory of Religion. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, Jürg, and Ertman, Thomas, eds. 2002. Consociationalism and Corporatism in Western Europe: Still the Politics of Accommodation?. Meppel: Boom.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 2001. “The World's Religious Systems and Democracy: Crafting the ‘Twin Tolerations.’” In Arguing Comparative Politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, Gerry. 2006. Why Politics Matters. Making Democracy Work. Houndmills, NJ: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Talmon, Jacob L. 1960. Political Messianism: The Romantic Phase. New York, NY: Prager.Google Scholar
Taverne, Dick. 2005. The March of Unreason. Science, Democracy, and the New Fundamentalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Torcal, Mariano, and Montero, José Ramón, eds. 2006a. Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions, and Politics. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torcal, Mariano, and Montero, José Ramón. 2006b. “Political Disaffection in Comparative Perspective.” In Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions, and Politics, ed. Torcal, Mariano, and Montero, José Ramón. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kersbergen, Kees. 1995. Social Capitalism. A Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare. State London, UK: Routlegde.Google Scholar
Van Kersbergen, Kees. 2000. “Political Allegiance and European Integration.” European Journal of Political Research 37:117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kersbergen, Kees. 2003. “Welfare State Reform and Political Allegiance.” The European Legacy 8:559571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Kersbergen, Kees. 2008. “The Christian Democratic Phoenix and Modern Unsecular Politics.” Party Politics 14:323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voegelin, Eric. 2000. Modernity without Restraint: The Political Religions, the New Science of Politics, and Science, Politics, and Gnosticism. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1991. The Rise Of Candidate-Centered Politics: Presidential Elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1905. “Die protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus.” http://www.uni-potsdam.de/u/paed/Flitner/Flitner/Weber/PE.pdf (Accessed on March 20, 2008).Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 2005. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Scott. 2006. “Electrifying Democracy? 10 Years of Policy and Practice.” Parliamentary Affairs 59:236250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zúquete, Pedro José. 2007. Missionary Politics in Contemporary Europe. New York, NY: Syracuse University.Google Scholar