Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:21:33.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Educating for Citizenship? Re-Assessing the Role of Islamic Instruction in German Schools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2010

Joyce Marie Mushaben*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri at St. Louis
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Joyce Marie Mushaben, Department of Political Science, 347 SSB, One University Blvd., University of Missouri, St. Louis, Missouri, MO 63121-4400. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Positing a “clash of cultures,” many European politicians oppose Muslim headscarves as well as Islamic instruction in public schools; the real source of “failed integration” lies not with the religiosity of young Muslims but rather with an arcane definition of “state neutrality” that sustains the dominance of some religions at the expense of others. Focusing on Germany, this study reviews educational statistics pertaining to youth of migrant origin, showing that conflicts over Islamic instruction mirror deeper patterns of minority discrimination. It outlines the legal hurdles new faith communities must overcome to secure recognition as “corporate entities under public law” (Körperschaftsstatus), entitling them to accredited teacher training, tax-funded salaries, construction subsidies, and other institutional privileges. It describes divergent curricular models utilized by the Länder, followed by a closer look at Islamic instruction in Berlin, where a court ruling compelled authorities to take a pro-active approach. It concludes with a review of dilemmas inherent in Germany's approach to “value education” against the backdrop of the new European Union anti-discrimination directives.

Show me any mischief produced by the madness or wickedness of theologians, and I will show you a hundred resulting from the ambition and villany of conquerors and statesmen. Show me an absurdity in religion, and I will undertake to show you a hundred for one in political laws and institutions

Edmund Burke, 1756

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abadan-Unat, Nermin. ed. 1976. Turkish Workers in Europe. 1960–1975. Leiden, UK: E.J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bade, Klaus. ed. 1996. Migration. Ethnizität. Konflikt: Systemfragen und Fallstudien (Migration, Ethnicity, Conflict: Systemic Questions and Case Studies). Osnabrück, Germany: Universitätsverlag Rasch.Google Scholar
Berlin Integrations- und Migrationsbeauftragte. 2004. “Wie verändert der Islam die Schule im Kiez (How Islam Changes the School in the ‘Hood).” March 8.Google Scholar
Berliner Zeitung. 2005. “Fast 50 000 Berliner wollen Religion (Almost 50,000 Berliners want religion).” June 3, 17.Google Scholar
Bielefeld, Heiner. 2003. Muslime im säkularen Rechtsstaat: Integrationschancen durch Reli-gionsfreiheit (Muslims in the Secular State: Integration Chances through Religious Freedom). Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
Bommes, Michael. 1999. “Probleme der beruflichen Eingliederung von Zuwanderern: Migranten in Organisationen (Problems of Occupational Integration among Foreigners: Migrants in Organizations).” In Integration und Integrationsförderung in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft (Integration and Integration Promotion in the Migration Society). Bonn, Germany: Forschungsinstitut der Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
Bundesministerium für Familie, Frauen und Jugend. 2003. “Sechster Familienbericht. Familien ausländischer Herkunft in Deutschland (Sixth Family Report. Families of Foreign Descent in Germany).” Deutscher Bundestag 14:4357.Google Scholar
BverfGE 93, 1. 1995. “Kruzifix (Crucifix).” http://www.servat.unibe.ch/law/dfr/bv093001.html (Accessed June 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Cesari, Jocelyn. 2004. When Islam and Democracy Meet: Muslims in Europe and in the United States. New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Roger. 1998. “Long Dispute Ends as Berlin Court Backs Islamic School Lessons.” New York Times, November 6.Google Scholar
De Graaf, Nan Dirk, and Flap, Hendrick Derk. 1988. “With a Little Help from My Friends: Social Resources as an Explanation of Occupational Status and Income in West Germany, the Netherlands, and the United States.” Social Forces 67:452472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutscher, Bundestag. 2002. “Islam in Deutschland.” Drucksache 14:4530.Google Scholar
Driessen, Geert, and Merry, Michael S.. 2006. “Islamic Schools in the Netherlands: Expansion or Marginalzation.” Interchange 37:201223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahrun, Joachim. 2005. “Integrationskurse versinken in Bürokratie (Integration Courses Drown in Bureaucracy).” Berliner Morgenpost, July 18.Google Scholar
Federal Commissioner for Foreigners. 2002. “Facts and Figures on the Situation of Foreigners in the Federal Republic of Germany.” http://www.dlt.pt/ficheiros/Immigration_in_Germany.pdf (Accessed May 21, 2010).Google Scholar
Greve, Martin, and Çinar, Tülay. 1987. Türkische Berliner. Eine Minderheit stellt sich vor (Turkish Berliners: A Minority Introduces Itself). Berlin, Germany: Verwaltungsdrückerei.Google Scholar
Hawranek, Christiane. 2008. “We Pretend You're a Church.” Qantara http://www.qantara.de/webcom/show_article.php/_c-478/_nr-582/i.html (Accessed August 10, 2007).Google Scholar
Heckmann, Friedrich. 2009. Förderunterricht für Kinder und Jugendliche mit Migrationshinter grund (Special Instruction for Children and Youth with Migration Background). Bamberg, Germany: Efms.Google Scholar
Heitmeyer, W., Dollase, R., and Vossen, J., eds. 1996. Die bedrängte Toleranz. Ethnisch-kulturelle Konflikte, religiöse Differenzen und die Gefahren politisierter Gewalt (Repressive Tolerance: Ethnic-Cultural Conflicts, Religious Differences and the Perils of Politicized Violence). Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Charles. 2004. “The Role of Religion in the Origins and Adaptation of Immigrant Groups in the United States.” International Migration Review 38:12061233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York, NY: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Jonker, Gerdien. 2002a. “Probleme der Kommunikation zwischen Muslimen und der Mehrheitsgesellschaft – Analyse und praktische Beispiele (Problems of Communication between Muslims and Majority Society—Analysis and Practical Examples).” In Vom Dialog zur Kooperation. Die Integration von Muslimen in der Kommune (From Dialogue to Communication: The Integration of Muslims at the Communal Level). http://www.kirchameck.de/diskussion12.pdf (Accessed May 21, 2010).Google Scholar
Jonker, Gerdien. 2002b. “Muslim Emancipation? Germany”s Struggle over Religious Pluralism.” In Religious Freedom and the Neutrality of the State. The Position of Islam in the European Union, eds. Shadid, W.A.R., and van Koningsveld, P.S.. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters.Google Scholar
Jonker, Gerdien. 2002c. “Ahnungslosigkeit und Zerrbilder. Zum Verhältnis von Islamischen Organisationen und Deutscher Öffentlichkeit.” Presented at the Evangelische Akademie, Loccum, Germany.Google Scholar
Jonker, Gerdien. 2007. “Vor den Toren: Bildung. Macht und Glauben aus der Sicht religiöser muslimischer Frauen (Outside the Gates: Education, Power and Belief, through the Lens of Muslim Women).” http://www.gerdien-jonker.de/pub3.htm (Accessed September 12, 2007).Google Scholar
Kastoryano, Riva. 2004. “Religion and Incorporation: Islam in France and Germany.” International Migration Review 38:12341255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastoryano, Riva. 1998. Transnational Participation and Citizenship: Immigrants to the European Union. Paris, France: Centre d”etudes et de Recherches Internationales.Google Scholar
Kelek, Necla. 2005. Die fremde Braut. Cologne, Germany: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.Google Scholar
Kirschbaum, Erik. 2009. “Berlin ‘Pro-Religion’ Referendum Soundly Defeated.” http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSTRE53P2D620090426 (Accessed May 21, 2010).Google Scholar
Klopp, Brett. 2001. German Multiculturalism. Immigrant Integration and the Transformation of Citizenship. Westport. CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Knubbertz, Angelina. 2000. “Das ‘Berliner Modell’ oder: Die andere Art. Religionsuntericht zu organisieren.” In Islamischer Religionsunterricht an staatlichen Schulen.Google Scholar
Koenig, Matthias. 2007. “Europeanising the Governance of Religious Diversity: An Institutionalist Account of Muslim Struggles for Public Recognition.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33:911932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, Ruud, Statham, Paul, Giugni, Marco, and Passy, Florence. 2005. Contested Citizenship, Political Contention over Migration and Ethnic Relations in Western Europe. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kostakopoulou, Theodora. 2004. “European Citizenship and Immigration after Amsterdam: Openings, Silences, Paradoxes.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 24:639656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozol, Jonathan. 2005. The Shame of the Nation. The Restoration of Apartheid Schooling in America. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Lakotta, Beate, 2008. “Anyone Who Wants Integration Has to Provide Islam Instruction.” http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,541440,00.html (Accessed August 7, 2008).Google Scholar
Lau, Jörg. 2008. “Götterstunde (Hour of the Gods).” Die Zeit, August 28.Google Scholar
Levitt, Peggy. 2001. “Between God, Ethnicity, and Country: An Approach to the Study of Transnational Religion.” Presented at the Workshop on Transnational Migration: Comparative Perspectives, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Marshall, T.H., and Bottomore, Tom. 1992. Citizenship and Social Class. London, UK: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Migration und Bevölkerung. 2005. “Deutschland: Diskussion um Moschee-Bau in Köln (Germany: Discussing Mosque Construction in Cologne).” July 5.Google Scholar
Miera, Frauka. 2007. “Multiculturalism in the Classroom. Reflections on German Integration Policies.” Presented at the German Studies Association Meeting. San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Minkenberg, Michael. 2007. “Democracy and Religion: Theoretical and Empirical Observations on the Relationship between Christianity. Islam and Liberal Democracy.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 33:887909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moldenhawer, Bolette. 2005. “Transnational Migration Communities and Education Strategies Among Pakistani Youngsters in Denmark.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31:5178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mushaben, Joyce Marie. 2008. The Changing Faces of Citizenship: Integration and Mobilization among Minorities in Germany. Providence, RI: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Mushaben, Joyce Marie. (2009). “Up the Down Staircase: Redefining Gender Identities through Ethnic Employment in Germany.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35:1249–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mushaben, Joyce Marie. 1985. “A Crisis of Culture: Social Isolation and Integration among Turkish Guest Workers in the German Federal Republic.” In Turkish Workers in Europe: A Multidisciplinary Study, eds. Basgoz, Ilyan, and Furniss, Norman. Bloomington: IN University Press, 125150.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2003. “Islamic Culture and Democracy: Testing the ‘Clash of Civilizations' Thesis.” Comparative Sociology 1:235265.Google Scholar
Pfaff, Ulrich. 2000. “Islamische Unterweisung in Nordrhein-Westfalen (Islamic Subordination in Northrhine Westphalia).” In Islamischer Religionsunterricht an staatlichen Schulen in Deutschland. Berlin, Germany: Commissioner for Foreigners.Google Scholar
Prußky, Christine. 2007. “Zuwanderer an die Unis: Soziologe Ralf Dahrendorf fordert Migrantenquote (Migrants at Universities: Sociologist Ralf Dahrendorf Calls for a Migrant Quota).” Der Spiegel, September 21.Google Scholar
Schieder, Rolf. 2001. Wieviel Religion verträgt Deutschland? (How Much Religion Can Germany Take?). Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Schiffauer, Werner. 1983. Die Gewalt der Ehre. Erklärung zu einem türkisch-deutschen Sexualkonflikt (The Violence of Honor: Explaining a Turkish-German Sexuality-Conflict). Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Schiffauer, Werner. 1991. Die Migranten aus Subay: Türken in Deutschland. Eine Ethnographie (The Migrants from Subay: Turks in Germany. An Ethnographic Study). Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Schiffauer, Werner. 1997. Fremde in der Stadt. Zehn Essays über Kulture und Differenz (Strangers in the City: Ten Essays on Culture and Difference). Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Schiffauer, Werner. 2000. Die Gottesmänner. Türkische Islamisten in Deutschland (God's Men: Turkish Islamicists in Germany). Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Schiffauer, Werner. 2002. Migration und kulturelle Differenz (Migrantion and Cultural DIfference). Berlin, Germany: Ausländerbeauftragte.Google Scholar
Seifert, Wolfgan. 1992. “Die zweite Ausländergeneration in der Bundesrepublik. Eine Längsschnittbeobachtung in der Berufseinstiegsphase (The Second Foreigner Generation in the Federal Republic: Panel Study Observations regarding the Occupational Entry Stage).” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 44:677696.Google Scholar
Shadid, W.A.R., and van Koningsveld, P.S.. eds. 2006. Religious Freedom and the Neutrality of the State. The Position of Islam in the European Union. Leuven, Belgium: Peeters.Google Scholar
Siegert, Manuel. 2007. “Schulische Bildung von Migranten in Deutschland (The Elementary Education of Migrants in Germany).” Berlin, Germany: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlingen.Google Scholar
Spielhaus, Riem, and Färber, Alexa. 2007. Islamisches Gemeindeleben in Berlin (Islamic Community Life in Berlin). Berlin, Germany: Beauftragte des Senats für Integration und Migration.Google Scholar
Spiewak, Martin. 2008. “Koran ohne Schleier (Qu'ran without the Veil).” Die Zeit, March 13.Google Scholar
Spiewak, Martin. 2009. “Die Kirche im Klassenzimmer (The Church in the Classroom).” Die Zeit, April 23.Google Scholar
Spiewak, Martin. 1998. “Allah ist schulreif (Allah is Ready for School).” http://www.zeit.de/1998/31/199831.islam-unterricht.xml (Accessed August 7, 2007).Google Scholar
Tan, Dursun, and Waldhoff, Hans-Peter. 1996. “Turkish Everyday Culture in Germany and its Prospects.” In Turkish Culture in German Society Today, eds. Horrocks, D., and Kolinsky, E.. Providence, RI: Berghahn Books, 137156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torney-Purta, Judith, and Schwille, John. 1986. “Civic Values Learned in School: Policy and Practice in Industrialized Nations.” Comparative Education Review 30:3049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, Ralf E. 2001. “Die zukünftige Bevölkerungsstruktur Deutschlands nach Staatsangehörigkeit, Geburtsort und ethnischer Herkunft: Modellrechnung bis 2050 (The Future Demographic Structure According to Nationality: Birthplace and Ethnic Heritage: Model Projections through 2050).” In Gutachten für die Unabhängige Kommission Zuwanderung (Expert Report for the Independent Commission on Integration). Berlin/Windhoek: April.Google Scholar
“Verfassungsgericht gibt ‘Zeugen Jehovahs’ recht: Religionsgemeinschaften müssen keine positive Grundeinstellung zum Staat haben.” 2000. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, December 20.Google Scholar
Vieth-Entus, Susanne. 2005. “Deutschstunden für Islamlehrer (German Lessons for Islamic Teachers).” Der Tagespiegel, June 3.Google Scholar
Zacharias, Diane. 2005. “Access of Muslim Organizations to Religious Instruction in Public Schools: Comment on the Decision of the Federal Administrative Court of 23 February 2005.” http://www.germanlawjournal.com/pdfs/Vol06No10/PDF_Vol_06_No_10_1318-1337_Developments_Zacharias.pdf (Accessed August 10, 2007).Google Scholar
Zentrum Demokratische Kultur. 2003. Demokratiegefährdenden Phänomene in Friedrichshain Kreuzberg und Möglichkeiten der Intervention (Democracy-Endangering Phenomena in Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg and Possibilities for Intervention). Berlin: February.Google Scholar
Zentrum für Türkeistudien. 2001. Intergeneratives Verhalten. Expert report for the Independent Commission on Immigration and Integration Essen.Google Scholar