Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:39:05.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Women in International Relations: Sediment, Trends, and Agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2008

Mary Ann Tétreault
Mary Ann Tétreault
Affiliation:
Trinity University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Not quite 15 years ago, the International Studies Association (ISA) sponsored an investigation into the status of women in the profession. Most of the conclusions were not too far from what Daniel Maliniak, Amy Oakes, Susan Peterson, and Michael Tierney report in this issue: Women are underrepresented among academics in political science as a whole, and especially in the field of international relations. They also are underrepresented in higher academic ranks. Although they publish at about the same rate as their male counterparts, women's work is far less likely to be cited or mentioned as influential in the field. The “Women in International Relations” study by Maliniak and his coauthors shows that not much has changed—or has it?

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 144 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brooks, David. 2001. “The Organization Kid.” Atlantic, April, 40–46, 48–54.Google Scholar
Caldicott, Helen A. 1984. Missile Envy: The Arms Race and Nuclear War. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Cohn, Carol. 1987. “Nuclear Language and How We Learned to Pat the Bomb.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 43 (June): 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohn, Carol. 1998. “Gays in the Military: Texts and Subtexts.” In The “Man” Question in International Relations, ed. Marysia, Zalewski and Parpart, Jane. Boulder, CO: Westview, 129–49.Google Scholar
Dresch, Stephen P. 1983. “College Enrollment.” Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 35 (2) The Crisis in Higher Education: 108–18.Google Scholar
Evans, Sara M. 1979. Personal Politics: The Roots of Women's Liberation in the Civil Rights Movement & the New Left. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Forell, Caroline, and Matthews, Donna. 2000. A Law of Her Own: The Reasonable Woman as a Measure of Man. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Friedan, Betty. 1963. The Feminist Mystique. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Giampetro-Meyer, Andrea. 2006. “Standing in the Gap: A Profile of Employment Discrimination Plaintiffs.” Berkeley Journal of Employment and Law 27 (2): 431–41.Google Scholar
Grant, Rebecca. 1992. “The Quagmire of Gender and International Security.” In Gendered States: Feminist “Re”Visions of International Relations Theory, Peterson, d. V. Spike. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Charlotte. 1998. “Masculinist Practices and Gender Politics: The Operation of Multiple Masculinities in International Relations.” In The “Man” Question in International Relations, ed. Marysia, Zalewski and Parpart, Jane. Boulder, CO: Westview, 28–53.Google Scholar
Jenifer, Franklyn G. 2005. “Minorities and Women in Higher Education and the Role of Mentoring in their Advancement.” Paper prepared for the Office of Academic Affairs, University of Texas System, 6 October. http://www.utsystem.edu/aca/files/Mentorship.pdf (September 16, 2007).Google Scholar
McCabe, Patricia J. 2003. “Speaking Out for Justice in Higher Education: The AAUW Legal Advocacy Fund Works to end Sex Discrimination in Academe.” In Partial Truths and the Politics of Community, ed. Tétreault, Mary Ann and Teske, Robin L.. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 275–84.Google Scholar
Murphy, Craig N. 1998. “Six Masculine Roles in International Relations and their Interconnection: A Personal Investigation.” In The “Man” Question in International Relations, ed. Zalewski, Marysia and Parpart, Jane. Boulder, CO: Westview, 109–28.Google Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike, ed. 1991. Gendered States: Feminist “Re”Visions of International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Press, Eyal. 2007. “Family-Leave Values.” New York Times Magazine, July 29, 36–41.Google Scholar
Rosen, Ruth. 2007. “Why Working Women Are Stuck in the 1950s.” Alternet, February 27. http://www.alternet.org/story/48370/ (September 16, 2007).Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. 1985. “Male Hysteria.” In The Female Malady: Women, Madness, and English Culture, 1830–1980. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Tétreault, Mary Ann, Johnstone, Tracey L., Ling, Jeffrey, and Hornung, Lynette. 1997. “Final Report: Effects of Gender on the Publication Records of Scholars in International Studies.” Presented to the Governing Council of the International Studies Association.Google Scholar
Webb, James. 1979. “Women Can't Fight.” Washingtonian, November, 144–48, 273–77.Google Scholar
Wills, Garry. 2006. “Mousiness.” New York Review of Books, June 8, 14 ff.Google Scholar
Wilson, III, Ernest, J. 1987. “World Politics and International Energy Markets.” International Organization 41 (Winter): 125–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zalewski, Marysia, and Parpart, Jane, ed. 1998. The “Man” Question in International Relations. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar