Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:37:49.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Dissident Citizens Are Militant Mamas: Intersectional Gender and Agonistic Struggle in Welfare Rights Activism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2016

Holloway Sparks
Holloway Sparks*
Affiliation:
Emory University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I argue that contemporary theories of agonistic democracy offer provocative insights into democratic activism and protest but require a more robust account of intersectional gender to adequately theorize the challenges of disruptive dissent. To this end, I propose an agonistic and feminist account of “dissident citizenship,” the democratic practices of disruption used to problematize and disturb the status quo when formal channels of democratic change are inadequate. My account foregrounds how intersectional gender formations pervade dissident practices, including activists’ ongoing struggles with their critics over their democratic standing and performances of disruption. I illustrate these theoretical claims through a case study of dissident citizenship drawn from U.S. politics, the welfare rights movement of 1966–75. Intersectional gender formations assisted welfare activists in claiming democratic standing as loving, hardworking mothers and in becoming bold dissidents. It was nonetheless exceedingly difficult for the poor, usually minority “militant mamas” to remain intelligible as full citizens when critics rejected their claims as the greediness of “breeders” and “cheaters” and dismissed their democratic disruptions as offensive, violence-causing disorders. Attending to intersectional gender dynamics highlights critical dimensions of democratic contestation that agonistic theories must address more carefully.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 623 - 647
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramovitz, Mimi. 2001. “Everyone Is Still on Welfare: The Role of Redistribution in Social Policy.” Social Work 46 (4): 297–308.Google Scholar
Ackelsberg, Martha A. 2010. Resisting Citizenship: Feminist Essays on Politics, Community, and Democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bosniak, Linda. 2006. The Citizen and the Alien: Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boykoff, Jules. 2007. Beyond Bullets: The Suppression of Dissent in the United States. Oakland, CA: AK Press.Google Scholar
Branzdel, Amy L. 2016. Against Citizenship: The Violence of the Normative. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1992. “Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of ‘Postmodernism.’” In Feminists Theorize the Political, eds. Butler, Judith and Scott, Joan W.. New York: Routledge, 3–21.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carbin, Maria, and Edenheim, Sara. 2013. “The Intersectional Turn in Feminist Theory: A Dream of a Common Language?” European Journal of Women's Studies 20 (3): 233–48.Google Scholar
Carby, Hazel V. 1987. Reconstructing Womanhood: The Emergence of the Afro-American Woman Novelist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, Samuel. 2013. The Lessons of Rancière. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, Samuel, and Carver, Terrell. 2007. Judith Butler and Political Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chappell, Marisa. 2010. The War on Welfare: Family, Poverty, and Politics in Modern America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Cho, Summi, Crenshaw, Kimberle, and McCall, Leslie. 2013. “Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis.” Signs 38 (4): 785–810.Google Scholar
Cohen, Cathy. 1997. “Punks, Bulldaggers, and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics?” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 3 (4): 437–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Lara Montesinos, and Tucker, Karen, eds. 2012. Situating Global Resistance: Between Discipline and Dissent. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coles, Rom. 1997. Rethinking Generosity: Critical Theory and the Politics of Caritas. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. 1993. The Terms of Political Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. 1995. The Ethos of Pluralization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. 2005. Pluralism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Connolly, William E. 2008. “An Interview with William Connolly.” In The New Pluralism: William Connolly and the Contemporary Global Condition, eds. Campbell, David and Schoolman, Morton. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 305–36.Google Scholar
Cruikshank, Barbara. 1999. The Will to Empower: Citizens and Other Subjects. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dhamoon, Rita Kaur. 2011. “Considerations on Mainstreaming Intersectionality.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 230–43.Google Scholar
Estes, Steve. 2005. “I Am a Man!”: Race, Manhood, and the Civil Rights Movement. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. 1995. The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family, and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, and Gordon, Linda. 1994. “A Genealogy of ‘Dependency’: Tracing a Keyword of the U.S. Welfare State.” Signs 19 (2): 309–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goi, Simona. 2005. “Agonism, Deliberation, and the Politics of Abortion.” Polity 37 (1): 54–81.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Chad Alan. 2007. Citizens and Paupers: Relief, Rights, and Race, from the Freedmen's Bureau to Workfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda. 1994. Pitied but Not Entitled: Single Mothers and the History of Welfare. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1996. “Introduction: Who Needs ‘Identity’?” In Questions of Cultural Identity, eds. Hall, Stuart and du Gay, Paul. London: Sage Publications, 1–17.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2004. The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2012. “Trayvon Martin, Intersectionality, and the Politics of Disgust.” Theory & Event 15 (3). https://muse.jhu.edu/article/484428 (accessed May 10, 2016).Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 1993. Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 1995. “Toward an Agonistic Feminism.” In Feminist Interpretations of Hannah Arendt, ed. Honig, Bonnie. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 135–66.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 2001. Democracy and the Foreigner. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 2013. Antigone, Interrupted. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Christopher. 1997. The Hidden Welfare State: Tax Expenditures and Social Policy in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huffer, Lynne. 2013. Are the Lips a Grave? A Queer Feminist on the Ethics of Sex. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, Jennet. 2008. Uncivil Disobedience: Studies in Violence and Democratic Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kornbluh, Felicia. 2007. The Battle for Welfare Rights: Politics and Poverty in Modern America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Kotef, Hagar, and Amir, Merav. 2007. “(En)Gendering Checkpoints: Checkpoint Watch and the Repercussions of Intervention.” Signs 32 (4): 973–96.Google Scholar
Kotz, Nick, and Kotz, Mary Lynn. 1977. A Passion for Equality: George A. Wiley and the Movement. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
La Barbera, MariaCaterina. 2012. “Intersectional-Gender and the Locationality of Women ‘in Transit.’” In Feminism and Migration: Cross Cultural Engagements, ed. Bonafacio, Glenda Tibe. New York: Springer, 17–31.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, ed. 1994. The Making of Political Identities. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Toward a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Bonita, and Dua, Enakshi. 2005. “Decolonizing Antiracism.” Social Justice 32 (4): 120–43.Google Scholar
Mackin, Glenn. 2013. The Politics of Social Welfare in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Managhan, Tina. 2007. “Shifting the Gaze from Hysterical Mothers to ‘Deadly Dads’: Spectacle and the Anti-Nuclear Movement.” Review of International Studies 33 (4): 637–54.Google Scholar
Marchart, Oliver. 2007. Post-Foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Markell, Patchen. 2003. Bound by Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Milwaukee County Welfare Rights Organization. 1972. Welfare Mothers Speak Out: We Ain't Gonna Shuffle Anymore. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn. 1994. The Wages of Motherhood: Inequality in the Welfare State, 1917–1942. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn. 1998. Welfare's End. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2007. “Democracy as Agonistic Pluralism.” In Rewriting Democracy: Cultural Politics in Postmodernity, ed. Ermarth, Elizabeth Deeds. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 36–45.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2013. Agonistics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Nadasen, Premilla. 2004. Welfare Warriors: The Welfare Rights Movement in the United States. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, Jennifer. 2013. “Practicing Love: Black Feminism, Love-Politics, and Post-Intersectionality.” Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism 11 (2): 1–24.Google Scholar
National Welfare Rights Organization Papers. Moorland-Spingarn Research Center, Howard University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Norval, Aletta. 1996. Deconstructing Apartheid Discourse. London: Verso.Google Scholar
NOW! National Welfare Leaders Newsletter [continued as The Welfare Fighter]. 1966–69. Washington, DC: Poverty/Rights Action Center. Wisconsin Historical Society, Microfilm Collection.Google Scholar
Orleck, Annelise. 2005. Storming Caesars Palace: How Black Mothers Fought Their Own War on Poverty. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Pandey, Gyanendra, ed. 2010. Subaltern Citizens and Their Histories. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard. 1978. Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard. 1993. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Puar, Jasbir. 2012. “‘I Would Rather Be a Goddess than a Cyborg’: Becoming-Intersectional in Assemblage Theory.” PhiloSOPHIA 2 (1): 49–66.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. 1999. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Schreiber, Ronnee. 2008. Righting Feminism: Conservative Women and American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 1999. Democratic Justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1991. American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Anna Marie. 1998. Laclau and Mouffe: The Radical Democratic Imaginary. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Anna Marie. 2007. Welfare Reform and Sexual Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soss, Joe, Fording, Richard, and Schram, Sanford. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sparks, Holloway. 1997. “Dissident Citizenship: Democratic Theory, Political Courage, and Activist Women.” Hypatia 12 (4): 74–110.Google Scholar
Sparks, Holloway. 2015a. “Mama Grizzlies and Guardians of the Republic: The Democratic and Intersectional Politics of Anger in the Tea Party Movement.” New Political Science 37 (1): 25–47.Google Scholar
Sparks, Holloway. 2015b. “Second Amendment Sisters and Passionate Patriots: The Affective, Democratic, and Gendered Politics of Anger in the U.S. Gun Control Debate.” Presented at the Association for Political Theory Annual Meeting, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
Sparks, Holloway. N.d. Dissident Citizenship: Gender and the Politics of Democratic Disturbance. New York: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, eds. Nelson, Cary and Grossberg, Lawrence. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 271–313.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 2013. Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality and Justice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on Ways and Means. 1969. Social Security and Welfare Proposals, Part 3. 91st Cong., 1st sess., 27 October.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance. 1967. Social Security Amendments of 1967, Part 2. 90th Cong., 1st sess., 19–20 September.Google Scholar
Wanzo, Rebecca. 2009. The Suffering Will Not Be Televised: African American Women and Sentimental Political Storytelling. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
The Welfare Fighter . 1969–1972. Washington, DC: Poverty/Rights Action Center. Wisconsin Historical Society, Microfilm Collection.Google Scholar
Wenman, Mark. 2013. Agonistic Democracy: Constituent Power in the Era of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiegman, Robyn. 2012. Object Lessons. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wiley, George A., Papers, 1949–1975. Wisconsin Historical Society, Madison.Google Scholar
Willett, Cynthia. 1995. Maternal Ethics and Other Slave Moralities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whitaker, William, Papers. 1961–1973. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Wilson, Angelia R., ed. 2013. Situating Intersectionality: Politics, Policy, and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wingenbach, Ed. 2011. Institutionalizing Agonistic Democracy: Postfoundationalism and Political Liberalism. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2003. “The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State.” Signs 29 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2011. The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Zerilli, Linda M. G. 2005. Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Zivi, Karen. 2012. Making Rights Claims. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar