Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T19:40:11.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Voting for Women in Belgium's Flexible List System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2016

Sofie Marien ,
Anke Schouteden  and
Bram Wauters
Sofie Marien
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam, KU Leuven
Anke Schouteden
Affiliation:
Ghent University
Bram Wauters
Affiliation:
Ghent University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Proportional electoral systems tend to be more beneficial for women's descriptive representation than majority systems. However, within proportional systems the gender equality of election outcomes differs, highlighting the importance of studying the actual use of electoral provisions in proportional representation (PR) systems. Therefore, we investigate the determinants of voting for female candidates in Belgium's local elections. This case is particularly interesting given the equal number of men and women on the candidate lists due to quota regulations, the possibility to cast multiple preference votes (lowering competition), and the high visibility of these local elections and its candidates. At the individual level, we find that women are more likely than men to vote for several women, yet same-sex voting is more common among men. Politically sophisticated respondents vote more often for candidates of both sexes. Against our expectations, a left-wing orientation does not increase the likelihood of voting for women. At the electoral district level, a larger supply of women at the top list position increases the chance to vote for this top woman, but there is no spillover effect to women lower on the list. District magnitude affects the number of preference votes but, against expectations, not the likelihood of voting for women.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2017 , pp. 305 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, Amy C. 2012. “Change in Women's Descriptive Representation and the Belief in Women's Ability to Govern: A Virtuous Cycle.” Politics & Gender 8 (4): 437–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
André, Audrey, Wauters, Bram, and Pilet, Jean-Benoit. 2012. “It's Not Only about Lists. Explaining Preference Voting in Belgium.” Journal of Elections, Parties and Public Opinion 22 (3): 293–313.Google Scholar
Ballmer-Cao, Thanh-Huyen, and Tremblay, Manon. 2008. “Modes de scrutin, partis politiques et élection des femmes: une introduction.” Swiss Political Science Review 14 (4): 609–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banducci, Susan A., and Karp, Jeffrey A.. 2000. “Gender, Leadership and Choice in Multiparty Systems.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (4): 818–48.Google Scholar
Borisyuk, Galina, Rallings, Colin, and Thrasher, Michael. 2007. “Women in English Local Government, 1973–2003: Getting Selected, Getting Elected.” Contemporary Politics 13 (2): 181–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brians, Craig L. 2005. “Women for Women? Gender and Party Bias in Voting for Female Candidates.” American Politics Research 33 (3): 357–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caluwaerts, Didier, Erzeel, Silvia, and Meier, Petra. 2013. “Is it Male Chauvinism or Political Apathy? Gender-Based Preferential Voting in Belgium.” Presented at the 3rd European Conference on Politics and Gender, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Carton, Ann. 1998. “Over de actie ‘stem vrouw’ en de plaats van de vrouw in de politiek.” In De (on)redelijke kiezer. Onderzoek naar de politieke opvattingen van Vlamingen: verkiezingen van 21 mei 1995, ed. Swyngedouw, Mark, Billiet, Jaak, Carton, Ann, and Beerten, Roeland. Leuven: Acco, 27–49.Google Scholar
Caul, Miki. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 79–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, Karen, and Meier, Petra. 2006. De macht van het geslacht. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth A. 1994. “Voter Responses to Women Senate Candidates.” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities, ed. Cook, Elizabeth A., Thomas, Sue, and Wilcox, Clyde. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, Fred. 2002. “The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice.” Journal of Politics 64 (2): 466–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2007. “Electoral Gender Quotas, Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result.” Representation 43 (2): 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dassonneville, Ruth, Marien, Sofie, and Hooghe, Marc. 2012. PARTIREP Exit Poll 2012 Technical Report. Leuven: Centre for Political Science Research KU Leuven.Google Scholar
de Moor, Joost, Marien, Sofie, and Hooghe, Marc. 2013. “Won't You Be My Number Two? De invloed van genderquota op het rekruteringsproces van vrouwelijke burgemeesters in het Vlaams Gewest van België (2012).” Res Publica 55 (3): 303–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschouwer, Kris. 2009. The Politics of Belgium. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 1998. “Voting for Women in ‘Year of the Woman.’” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 272–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2008. “Is There a ‘Gender Affinity Effect’ in American Politics? Information, Affect, and Candidate Sex in U.S. House Election.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (1): 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erzeel, Silvia. 2012. “Presence Theory and Beyond. An Empirical Study of Legislators’ Acting on Behalf of Women in European Democracies.” Ph.D. diss. Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar
Geys, Benny, and Heyndels, Bruno. 2003. “Influence of Cognitive Sophistication on Ballot Layout Effects.” Acta Politica 38 (4): 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giger, Nathalie, Holli, Anne-Marie, Lefkofridi, Zoe, and Wass, Hanna. 2014 “The Gender Gap in Same-Gender Voting: The Role of Context.” Electoral Studies 35 (3): 303–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth, and Croskill, Julie. 2011. “Gender Affinity Effects in Vote Choice in Westminster Systems: Assessing ‘Flexible’ Voters in Canada.” Politics & Gender 7 (2): 223–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurin, Patricia, Miller, Arthur H., and Gurin, Gerald. 1980. “Stratum Identification and Consciousness.” Social Psychology Quarterly 43 (1): 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Heath, Anothony, McLean, Iain, Taylor, Bridgat, and Curtice, John. 1999. “Between First and Second Order: A Comparison of Voting Behaviour in European and Local Elections in Britain.” European Journal of Political Research 35 (3): 389–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holli, Anne-Marie, and Wass, Hanna. 2010. “Gender-Based Voting in the Parliamentary Elections of 2007 in Finland.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (5): 598–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hox, Joop J. 2010. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, and Malami, Melissa. 1999. “Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis.” Social Forces 78 (1): 235–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, David C., and Matland, Richard E.. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31 (6): 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefevere, Jonas. 2013. “Zijn lokale verkiezingen tweederangsverkiezingen?” In De Lokale Kiezer. Het kiesgedrag bij de Belgische gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van oktober 2012, ed. Dassonneville, Ruth, Hooghe, Marc, Marien, Sofie, and Pilet, Jean-Benoit. Brussels: ASP Publishers, 93–116.Google Scholar
Leijenaar, Monique. 2004. “Een vrouwvriendelijk kiessysteem”. In Vrouwen vertegenwoordigd, Wetstraat gekraakt? Representativiteit feministisch bekeken, ed. Meier, Petra and Celis, Karen Brussels: VUBPress, 49–80.Google Scholar
Luskin, Robert C. 1990. “Explaining Political Sophistication.” Political Behavior 12 (4): 331–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, George. 2010. “First Come, First Served: The Effect of Ballot Position on Electoral Success in Open Ballot PR Elections.” Representation 46 (2): 167–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women?” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marien, Sofie, Dassonneville, Ruth, and Hooghe, Marc. 2015. “How Second Order Are Local Elections? Voting Motives and Party Preferences in Belgian Municipal Elections” Local Government Studies 41 (6): 898–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marissal, Claudine, and Hansen, Ingrid. 2001. Op weg naar de paritaire democratie. Analyse van de gemeente- en provincieraadsverkiezingen van 8 oktober 2000. Brussel: Federaal Ministerie van Tewerkstelling en Arbeid–Directie van de gelijke kansen.Google Scholar
Marsh, Michael, and Sinnott, Richard. 2008. Irish National Election Study 2002–2007. Data Description and Documentation. Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E. 1994. “Putting Scandinavian Equality to the Test: An Experimental Evaluation of Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates in a Sample of Norwegian Voters.” British Journal of Political Science 24 (2): 273–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matland, Richard E., and Montgomery, Kathleen A., eds. 2003. Women's Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matland, Richard E., and Studlar, Donley T.. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single and Multimember District Systems: Canada and Norway.” Journal of Politics 58 (3): 707–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Monika L. 2009. “Voting for Myself: Candidate and Voter Group Associations over Time.” Electoral Studies 28 (4): 606–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElroy, Gail, and Marsh, Michael. 2010. “Candidate Gender and Voter Choice: Analysis from a Multimember Preferential Voting System.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (4): 822–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElroy, Gail, and Marsh, Michael. 2011. “Electing Women to the Dáil: Gender Cues and the Irish Voter.” Irish Political Studies 26 (4): 521–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Petra. 2004. “The Mutual Contagion Effect of Legal and Party Quotas. A Belgian Perspective.” Party Politics 10 (5): 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1996. “Legislative Recruitment.” In Comparing Democracies. Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, ed. LeDuc, Lawrence, Niemi, Richard G., and Norris, Pippa. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 184–215.Google Scholar
Paolino, Phillip. 1995. “Group-Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 294–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Kunovich, Sheri, and Hughes, Melanie M.. 2007. “Gender in Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology 33: 263–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Plutzer, Eric, and Zipp, John F.. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (1): 30–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 570–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Eric R.A.N., and Fox, Richard L.. 2001. “The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studlar, Donley T., and McAllister, Ian. 2002. “Does a Critical Mass Exist? A Comparative Analysis of Women's Legislative Representation Since 1950.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (2): 233–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1998. “Introduction.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present and Future, ed. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–14.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Manon, ed. 2008. Women and Legislative Representation: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Sex Quotas. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wauters, Bram. 2000. De kracht van de voorkeurstem in stad en dorp. Een analyse bij de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van 1994 in Vlaanderen. Leuven: Afdeling Politologie.Google Scholar
Wauters, Bram, Weekers, Karolien, and Maddens, Bart. 2010. “Explaining the Number of Preferential Votes for Women in an Open List-PR System: The 2003 Federal Elections in Flanders (Belgium).” Acta Politica 45 (4): 468–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wauters, Bram, Verlet, Dries, and Ackaert, Johan. 2012. “Giving More Weight to Preferential Votes: Welcome or Superfluous Reform? The Case of the Local Elections in Flanders (Belgium).” Local Government Studies 38 (1): 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayenberg, Ellen, De Rynck, Filip, Steyvers, Kristof, and Pilet, Jean-Benoit. 2010. “Belgium: A Tale of Regional Divergence.” In The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe, ed. Hendriks, Frank, Lindström, Anders, and Loughlin, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 71–95.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina, and, Campbell, David. 2007. “Leading by Example. Female Members of Parliament as Political Role Models.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 921–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Marien supplementary material

Abstract and Appendix

Download Marien supplementary material(File)
File 46.2 KB