Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:18:18.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The UN Security Council and the Political Economy of the WPS Resolutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

Soumita Basu
Soumita Basu*
Affiliation:
South Asian University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As of June 2017, there were eight United Nations Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs) on “women and peace and security”—UNSCRs 1325, 1820, 1888, 1889, 1960, 2106, 2122, and 2242. These UNSCRs recognize the gendered nature of armed conflicts and peace processes. They propose institutional provisions geared mainly toward protecting women and girls during armed conflicts and promoting their participation in conflict resolution and prevention. In addition, in March 2016, the Security Council adopted UNSCR 2272, which recommends concrete steps to combat sexual exploitation and abuse in United Nations (UN) peacekeeping operations, an issue that is of significant concern for women, peace, and security (WPS) advocates. The volume of resolutions and policy literature on WPS would suggest that UNSCR 1325 and the follow-up UNSCRs have become central to the mandate of the Security Council. Yet there is a paucity of financial resources to pay for implementation of the resolutions; this has been described as “perhaps the most serious and persistent obstacle … over the past 15 years” (UN Women 2015, 372).

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 721 - 727
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderlini, Sanam Naraghi. 2007. Women Building Peace: What They Do, Why it Matters. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Basu, Soumita. 2016. “Gender as National Interest at the UN Security Council.” International Affairs 92 (2): 255–73.Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, and Downs, George W.. 2007. “The Empire's New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law.” Stanford Law Review 60 (2): 595–631.Google Scholar
Chinkin, Christine, and Charlesworth, Hilary. 2006. “Building Women into Peace: The International Legal Framework.” Third World Quarterly 27 (5): 937–57.Google Scholar
Duffield, Mark R. 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Gharekhan, Chinmaya R. 2006. The Horseshoe Table: An Inside View of the UN Security Council. New Delhi: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Harrington, Carol. 2011. “Resolution 1325 and Post-Cold War Feminist Politics.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 13 (4): 557–75.Google Scholar
Heathcote, Gina. 2011. “Feminist Politics and the Use of Force: Theorising Feminist Action and Security Council Resolution 1325.” Socio-legal Review 7. http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/13161/1/SLR_GH_103-344-1-PB.pdf (accessed September 8. 2017).Google Scholar
Hudson, Heidi. 2012. “A Double-edged Sword of Peace? Reflections on the Tension between Representation and Protection in Gendering Liberal Peacebuilding.” International Peacekeeping 19 (4): 443–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Natalie Florea, and Goetz, Anne Marie. 2014. “Too Much That Can't Be Said: Anne Marie Goetz in Conversation with Natalie Florea Hudson.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 16 (2): 336–46.Google Scholar
Laurenti, Jeffrey. 2004. “Financing the United Nations.” In The United Nations: Confronting the Challenges of a Global Society, ed. Krasno, Jean E.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 271–309.Google Scholar
Mathiason, John. 2007. Invisible Governance: International Secretariats in Global Politics. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Otto, Diane. 2010. “Power and Danger: Feminist Engagement with International Law through the UN Security Council.” Australian Feminist Law Journal 32 (1): 97–121.Google Scholar
PeaceWomen. 2017. “The Resolutions.” http://www.peacewomen.org/why-WPS/solutions/resolutions (accessed June 28, 2017).Google Scholar
Pratt, Nicola. 2013. “Reconceptualizing Gender, Reinscribing Racial-Sexual Boundaries in International Security: The Case of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 on ‘Women, Peace and Security.’” International Studies Quarterly 57 (4): 772–83.Google Scholar
Shepherd, Laura J. 2008. Gender, Violence and Security: Discourse as Practice. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
True, Jacqui. 2010. “The Political Economy of Violence against Women: A Feminist International Relations Perspective.” Australian Feminist Law Journal 32 (1): 39–59.Google Scholar
True, Jacqui. 2011. “Feminist Problems with International Norms: Gender Mainstreaming in Global Governance.” In Feminism and International Relations: Conversations about the Past, Present and Future, eds. Tickner, J. Ann and Sjoberg, Laura. New York: Routledge, 73–88.Google Scholar
Vreeland, James Raymond, and Dreher, Axel. 2014. The Political Economy of the United Nations Security Council: Money and Influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations Security Council (UNSC). 2009. SCR 1889 on Women and Peace and Security. UN Doc. No. S/Res/1889. http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1889(2009) (accessed September 11, 2017).Google Scholar
UN Women. 2015. Preventing Conflict, Transforming Justice, Security the Peace: A Global Study on the Implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar