Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T03:22:42.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Strategic Use of Gender and Race in Peru's 2011 Presidential Campaign

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2012

Christina Ewig
Christina Ewig
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The final round of Peru's 2011 presidential campaign featured two dramatically different candidates. Ollanta Humala was a leftist nationalist who sought to increase redistribution to the poorest and most marginalized. Keiko Fujmori was a right-wing proponent of the free market and the torchbearer of her father's presidential legacy of overcoming economic crisis and terrorism in the 1990s. According to the extant scholarship on the relationship between left parties and gender equality, we should have expected the leftist candidate to support gender equality policies more strongly.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 267 - 274
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ewig, Christina. 2006. “Hijacking Global Feminism: Feminists, the Catholic Church and the Family Planning Debacle in Peru.” Feminist Studies 32 (3): 632–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freidman, Elisabeth Jay. 2009. “Gender, Sexuality and the Latin American Left: Testing the Transformation.” Third World Quarterly 30 (2): 415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Liesl. 2010. Feminist Policy Making in Chile. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Htun, Mala, and Power, Timothy J.. 2006. “Gender, Parties, and Support for Equal Rights in the Brazilian Congress.” Latin American Politics & Society 48 (4): 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto de Opinión Pública. 2011a. Estado de Opinión Pública 6 (May). [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.]Google Scholar
Instituto de Opinión Pública. 2011b. “Anexos.” Opinión & Análisis 2 (July): 32–38. [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.]Google Scholar
Kampwirth, Karen. 2008. “Abortion, Antifeminism and the Return of Daniel Ortega: In Nicaragua, Leftist Politics?” Latin American Perspectives 35 (6): 122–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, and Malami, Melissa. 1999. “Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis.” Social Forces 78 (1): 235–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven 2011. “A Surprising Left Turn.” Journal of Democracy 22 (4): 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, Amy. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz Chirinos, Paula. 2011. “Más allá de la campaña.” Opinión & Análisis 2 (July): 7–16. [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.]Google Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 1999. “Women in the Legislatures and Executives of the World: Knocking at the Highest Glass Ceiling.” World Politics 51 (4): 547–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Martín. 2011. “A Vote for Moderate Change.” Journal of Democracy 22 (4): 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, Martín, Rodrigo Barrenecha, and Vera, Sofía. 2011. “Cambios y Continuidades en las Elecciones Presidenciales 2011.” Argumentos: Revista de Análysis y Crítica 5 (2): 1–8.Google Scholar
Vargas, Virginia. 1992. “Women: Tragic Encounters with the Left.” NACLA Report on the Americas 15 (5): 30–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar