Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:02:00.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State Feminism since the 1980s: From Loose Notion to Operationalized Concept

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2007

Amy G. Mazur  and
Dorothy E. McBride
Amy G. Mazur
Affiliation:
Washington State University
Dorothy E. McBride
Affiliation:
Florida Atlantic University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue that since the term state feminism first appeared in the 1980s, it has gone through three stages of development, becoming a formal concept useful in cross-national analysis in the last stage. Scholars first used the term loosely to describe a range of state activities with a gender/women's issues focus. Next, the concept became associated with the study of women's policy agencies. Most recently, a group of comparative gender and policy scholars—the Research Network on Gender Politics and the State (RNGS)—has developed systematic nominal and operational definitions of state feminism to study if, how, and why women's policy agencies make alliances with women's movements within the state to achieve feminist outcomes.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 501 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadan-Unat, Nermin and Tokgöz, Oya. 1994. “Turkish Women as Agents of Social Change in a Pluralist Democracy.” In Women and Politics Worldwide, ed. Nelson, Barbara and Chowdhury, Najma. New Haven: Yale University Press, 705–20.Google Scholar
Ackerly, Brooke, Stern, Maria, and True, Jacqui, eds. 2006. Feminist Methodologies for International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adcock, Robert, and Collier, David. 2001. “Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research.” American Political Science Review 95 (3): 529–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2000. “‘Beyond Compare?’ Women's Movements in Comparative Perspective.” European Journal of Political Research 37 (4): 431–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2005. “The Comparative Politics of Women's Movements.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (3): 583–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodur, Marella, and Franceschet, Susan. 2002. “Movements, States and Empowerment.” In Rethinking Empowerment: Gender and Development in a Global/Local World, ed. Parpart, Jane L., Shirin, Rai, and Staudt, Kathleen. London: Routledge, 112–32.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan, and Linda, Zerilli. 1993. “Feminist Challenges to Political Science.” In The State of the Discipline II, ed. Finifter, Ada W.. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, 55–76.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise A. 2002. Gendering Government: Feminist Engagement with the State in Australia and Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, Ann-Doret, and Raaum, Nina C.. 1999. “Models of Political Mobilization.” In Equal Democracies, ed. Bergqvist, Christina, et al. Oslo: Scandinavia University Press, 17–26.Google Scholar
Collier, D, and Mahon, J. E.. 1993. “Conceptual ‘Stretching’ Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.” American Political Science Review 87 (4): 845–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1986. The New Women's Movement. Bristol: Sage.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Hester. 1990. “Femocrats, Official Feminism and the Uses of Power.” In Playing the State: Australian Feminist Interventions, ed. Watson, S.. London: Verso, 87–103.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Hester. 1996. Inside Agitators: Australian Femocrats and the State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx. 2006. “Globalization and Feminism: Opportunities and Obstacles for Activism in the Global Arena.” In Global Feminism: Transnational Women's Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights, ed. Ferree, M. M. and Tripp, A. M.. New York: New York University Press, 3–23.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx, and Mueller, Carol. 2004. “Feminism and the Women's Movement: A Global Perspective.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, ed. Snow, David A.; Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter: Oxford: Blackwell, 576–607.Google Scholar
Franzway, S., Court, D., and Connell, R. W.. 1989. Staking a Claim: Feminism, Bureaucracy and the State. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Githens, M. 1983. “The Elusive Paradigm: Gender, Politics and Political Behavior.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Ada, W. Finifter. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association, 417–502.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary and Mazur, Amy, eds. Forthcoming. Concepts, Gender and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User's Guide. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra, ed. 1987. Feminism and Methodology. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hatem, Mervat F. 1994. “The Paradoxes of State Feminism in Egypt.” In Women and Politics Worldwide, ed. Nelson, Barbara and Chowdhury, Najma. New Haven: Yale University Press, 226–42.Google Scholar
Haussman, Melissa, and Sauer, Birgit, eds. 2007. Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Women's Movements and State Feminism in Post Industrial Democracies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2006. Feminist Inquiry: From Political Convictions to Methodological Innovation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Hernes, Helga. 1987. Welfare State and Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2005. “Quota Laws for Women in Politics: A New Type of State Feminism?” Paper presented at the Workshops of the European Consortium for Political Research Granada, Spain.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 1986. Women and European Politics: Contemporary Feminism and Public Policy. London: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, ed. 2005. State Feminism and Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lycklama à, Nijeholt, SweibelG., J. G., J., and Vargas, V.. 1998. “The Global Institutional Framework: The Long March to Beijing.” In Women's Movements and Public Policy in Europe, Latin America, and the Caribbean, ed. Nijeholt, G. Lycklama à, Vargas, V., and Wieringa, S.. New York: Garland, 25–48.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, Amy. 2007. “Feminist Comparative Policy.” In Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, ed. Jack, Rabin. London: Taylor and Francis, 1–6.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy and McBride, Dorothy. Forthcoming. “State Feminism.” In Politics, Gender and Concepts, eds. Goertz, Gary and Mazur, Amy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy, ed. 2001. State Feminism, Women's Movements, and Job Training: Making Democracies Work in the Global Economy. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McBride Stetson, Dorothy. 1987. Women's Rights in France. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
McBride Stetson, Dorothy, ed. 2001. Abortion Politics, Women's Movements and the Democratic State: A Comparative Study of State Feminism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride Stetson, Dorothy, and Mazur, Amy, eds. 1995a. Comparative State Feminism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
McBride Stetson, Dorothy, and Mazur, Amy. 1995b. “Introduction.” In Comparative State Feminism, ed. Stetson, Dorothy McBride and G. Mazur, Amy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1–21.Google Scholar
Outshoorn, Joyce. 1992. “‘Femocrats’ in the Netherlands: Mission or Career.” Paper presented at the European Consortium for Political Research Limerick.Google Scholar
Outshoorn, Joyce. 1994. “Between Movement and Government: ‘Femocrats’ in the Netherlands.” In Yearbook of Swiss Political Science, ed. Kriesi, H. Bern/Stuttgart/Wien: Paul Haupt Verlag, 141–65.Google Scholar
Outshoorn, Joyce, ed. 2004. The Politics of Prostitution: Women's Movements, Democratic States, and the Globalization of Sex Commerce. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, Rosemary, and Watson, S. 1992. “Women's Interests and the Post Structuralist State.” In Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates, ed. Barrett, M. and Phillips, A.. Cambridge: Polity, 53–73.Google Scholar
Rai, Shirin. 2003a. “Institutional Mechanisms for the Advancement of Women: Mainstreaming Gender, Democratizing the State?” In Mainstreaming Gender, Democratizing the State? Institutional Mechanisms for the Advancement of Women, ed. Rai, Shirin. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai, Shirin, ed. 2003b. Mainstreaming Gender, Democratizing the State? Institutional Mechanisms for the Advancement of Women. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RNGS. 2006. Project Description May 2005. http://libarts.wsu.edu/polisci/rngs (July 11, 2007).Google Scholar
Robinson, Jean. 1995. “Women, the State, and the Need for Civil Society: The Liga Kobiet in Poland.” In Comparative State Feminism, ed. Stetson, Dorothy McBride and Mazur, Amy G.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 203–20.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 1990. Sisters in Suits, Women and Public Policy in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Siim, Birte. 1991. “Welfare State, Gender Politics and Equality Policies: Women's Citizenship in the Scandinavian Welfare States.” In Equality Politics and Gender, ed. Meehan, E. & Sevenhuijsen, S.. London: Sage, 175–92.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1985. “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Bringing the State Back In, ed. Evans, P. B., Ruechemeyer, R., and Skocpol, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Ros, J., 1995. “‘Femocrat’ You Said? What Kind of Bird Is That?” Paper presented at the Workshops of the European Consortium for Political Research Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Watson, Sophie, ed. 1990. Playing the State: Australian Feminist Interventions. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Zheng, Wang. 2005. “State Feminism? Gender and Socialist State Formation in Maoist China.” Feminist Studies 31 (3): 519–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwingel, Susanne. 2005. How Do Women's Rights Norms Become Effective? An Analysis of the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women and its Domestic Impact. Ph.D. diss., Ruhr University-Bochum, Germany.Google Scholar