Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-07T09:51:16.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numbers and Beyond: The Relevance of Critical Mass in Gender Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2006

Sandra Grey
Sandra Grey
Affiliation:
Victoria University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Political scientists concerned with gender relations have long been interested in the numbers of women in national legislatures. Women make up slightly more than 50% of the world's population, yet average only 16% of the world's elected political posts. This has led to calls for action that would increase the number of women in legislatures based both on arguments of justice and on claims that an increase will substantively change decision-making processes and outcomes. Part of the debate about substantive changes in political decision making has centered on whether women in a legislature must reach a “critical mass” in order to bring about change in the political arena. The term critical mass is frequently used by politicians, the media, and academics, but can it offer insights into the influence of gender on political processes and outcomes? In this essay, I argue that critical mass is only useful if we discard the belief that a single proportion holds the key to all representation needs of women and if we discard notions that numbers alone bring about substantive changes in policy processes and outcomes. I use a longitudinal textual analysis of New Zealand parliamentary debates to begin development of a joint-effect model that can better explain the factors that aid (or hinder) the substantive representation of women.

Type
CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON GENDER AND POLITICS
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 492 - 502
Copyright
© 2006 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baysting, Arthur, Dyan Campbell, and Margaret Dagg, eds. 1993. Making Policy Not Tea: Women in Parliament. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
Broughton, Sharon, and Sonja Palmeri. 1999. “Gendered Contributions to Parliamentary Debates: The Case of Euthanasia.” Australian Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 29–45.Google Scholar
Broughton, Sharon, and Di Zetlin. 1996. “Queensland ALP Women Parliamentarians: Women in Suits and Boys in Factions.” International Review of Women and Leadership 2 (1): 47–61.Google Scholar
Catt, Helena. 2003. “How Can Women MPs Make a Difference? Reconsidering Group Representation and the Responsible Party Model.” Occasional Paper No. 6, Centre for the Advancement of Women in Politics, Queen's University, Belfast.
Childs, Sarah. 2004. “A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (1): 3–19.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–98.Google Scholar
Freedman, Jane. 2002. “Women in the European Parliament.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 179–88.Google Scholar
“General Debate.” 1988a. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates, Vol. 488: 3626–47.
“General Debate.” 1988b. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates, Hansard: Vol. 491: 5806–27.
Grey, Sandra. 2002. “Critical Mass and New Zealand Women MPs.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 19–29.Google Scholar
“Human Rights Amendment Bill: Second Reading.” 2001. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates, November 13, Vol. 596: 12992–13019.
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (1): 965–90.Google Scholar
Kathlene, Lyn. 1994. “Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking: The Interaction of Gender and Position in Committee Hearing Debates.” Political Science Review 88 (3): 560–76.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2001. “Women and Politics: Minority Representation or Critical Mass?” Parliamentary Affairs 54 (4): 743–58.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, and Pippa Norris. 2003. “Westminster Women: The Politics of Presence.” Political Studies 51 (1): 84–102.Google Scholar
McAllister, Ian, and Donley T. Studlar. 2002. “Does a Critical Mass Exist? A Comparative Analysis of Women's Legislative Representation since 1950.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (2): 233–53.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1993. “Women Politicians: Transforming Westminster?' Parliamentary Affairs 46 (2): 89–102.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pitkin, H. F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Reingold, Beth. 1992. “Concepts of Representation Among Female and Male State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (4): 509–37.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 2000. Representing Women: Sex, Gender, and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Sawer, Marian. 2000. “Parliamentary Representation of Women: From Discourses of Justice to Strategies of Accountability.” International Political Science Review 21 (4): 361–80.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 2004. “When Women Support Women: EMILY's List and the Substantive Representation of Women in Australia.” Paper prepared for Women and Westminster Compared Conference, West Block, Parliament Hill, Ottawa, June 10–12, 2004.
“Taxation (Parental Tax Credit) Bill: Third Reading.” 1999. New Zealand Parliamentary Debates, May 20, Vol. 577: 16686–700.
Thomas, Sue. 1991. “The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies.” Journal of Politics 53 (3): 958–76.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, Sue, and Susan Welch. 1991. “The Impact of Gender on Activities and Priorities of State Legislators.” Western Political Quarterly 44 (2): 445–56.Google Scholar
United Nations Economic, and Social Council. 2004. “FWCW Platform for Action,” http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/decision.htm; themes for progress on gender: http://www.un.org/ecosocdev/geninfo/afrec/vol12no1/eca2.htm (August 31, 2004).
Williams, Melissa S. 1996. “Memory, History and Membership: The Moral Claims of Marginalized Groups in Political Representation.” In Do We Need Minority Rights? ed. J. Raikka. Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 85–119.