Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:12:58.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Norm of Tradition: Gender Subordination and Women's Exclusion in International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2008

Laura Sjoberg
Laura Sjoberg
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The survey data in “Women in International Relations” explains that women are underrepresented in international relations as a whole, and that this underrepresentation only grows at the higher ranks of our profession. In observing the “gender gap” in IR, the essay offers an interesting and important overview of the possible reasons for women's underrepresentation and points out some meaningful differences between women and men in terms of perspective in the discipline, publication productivity, and teaching style, among other things. Near the beginning of the essay, the authors set up alternative explanations for women's marginal position in the discipline. They note that while feminist scholars relate women's marginalization to gender subordination, “other scholars suggest that the content of women's scholarship contributes to their marginalization” (see p. 122). I would argue that women's differences and gender subordination might not be competing explanations for women's marginalization. Instead, it might be that gender subordination can explain both women's differences and women's underrepresentation in the field.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 173 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackerly, Brooke A., Stern, Maria, and True, Jacqui. 2006. Feminist Methodologies For International Relations. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1987. Women and War. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia H. 1990. Bananas, Beaches & Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra G. 1998. Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary E. 1989. “Knowers, Knowing, Known: Feminist Theory and Claims of Truth.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 14 (3): 533–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy. 1989. “Freedom, Recognition, and Obligations: A Feminist Approach to Political Theory.” American Political Science Review 83 (4): 1217–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2003. The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catherine. 1989. Towards a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike. 1999. “Sexing Political Identities/Nationalism as Heterosexism.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 1 (1): 34–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike, and Runyan, Anne Sisson. 1999. Global Gender Issues. 2nd ed.Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Pettman, Jan Jindy. 1996. Worlding Women: A Feminist International Politics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1987. Feminism and Equality. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1993. Engenderings: Constructions of Knowledge, Authority, and Privilege. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sylvester, Christine. 1990. “Feminists and Realists on Autonomy and Obligation in International Relations.” In Seminar 14. Center for International Studies, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 2001. Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post–Cold War Era. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann, and Sjoberg, Laura. 2006. “Feminism.” In International Relations Theory, ed. Dunne, T., Kurki, M., and Smith, S.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 185–202.Google Scholar
United States Census. 2000. Demographic Profile Report. Available from http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/dp1/2kh00.pdf (7 September 2007).Google Scholar
Youngs, Gillian. 2004. “Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to the world ‘We’ Live In.” International Affairs 80 (1): 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar