Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:22:41.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Movement Institutions: The Bureaucratic Sources of Feminist Protest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2018

Laure Bereni  and
Anne Revillard
Laure Bereni
Affiliation:
Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), France
Anne Revillard
Affiliation:
Sciences Po, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the past several decades, scholarship on women's movements, feminism, and the state has brought renewed attention to the study of protest politics by questioning its frontier with dominant institutions. This article takes this critique a step further by considering the institutional dimension of the state-movement intersection. Drawing on the French case, we argue that institutions that are formally devoted to women's rights inside the state (women's policy agencies) can operate as movement institutions—that is, as bureaucratic instances routinely engrained with a protest dimension—rather than being only a shelter for a network of insider activists. As such, they can provide a specific, institutional feminist socialization to their members; they can purvey, rather than only relay, feminist protest, and they can deploy institutional repertoires of protest, combining bureaucratic and movement dimensions. We conclude that the definition and boundaries of the women's movement need to be broadened to include bureaucratic sources of feminist protest.

Keywords

Women's movementsocial movementfeminismwomen's policy agenciesstate feminisminstitutionsinsider activism
Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 407 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We wish to thank Mary Katzenstein and Amy Mazur for their most useful comments on earlier versions of this article, as well as the anonymous reviewers at Politics & Gender and the European Journal of Politics and Gender. This work is supported by a public grant overseen by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the “Investissements d'Avenir” program LIEPP (reference: ANR-11-LABX-0091, ANR-11-IDEX-0005-02).

References

REFERENCES

Andrew, Merrindahl. 2010. “Women's Movement Institutionalization: The Need for New Approaches.” Politics & Gender 6 (4): 609–16.Google Scholar
Andrew, Merrindahl. 2013. “The Institutional Harvest: Women's Services and Women's Policy Agencies.” In The Women's Movement in Protest, Institutions and the Internet: Australia in Transnational Perspective, eds. Sawer, Marian and Maddison, Sarah. London: Routledge, 87–104.Google Scholar
Andrew, Merrindahl, and Maddison, Sarah. 2010. “Damaged but Determined: The Australian Women's Movement, 1996–2007.” Social Movement Studies 9 (2): 171–85.Google Scholar
Andrew, Merrindahl, and McLaren, Kirsty. 2014. “Radical Institutions and Routine Protest? Women's Movement Activism against Male Violence.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Political Studies Association, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Elizabeth A., and Bernstein, Mary. 2008. “Culture, Power, and Institutions: A Multi-institutional Politics Approach to Social Movements.” Sociological Theory 26 (1): 74–99.Google Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann. 2005. “Inside and Outside the State: Movement Insider Status, Tactics and Public Policy Achievements.” In Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy, eds. Meyer, David S., Jenness, Valerie, and Hingram, Helen. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 149–76.Google Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann. 2010. The Women's Movement inside and outside the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann, Beckwith, Karen, and Rucht, Dieter, eds. 2003. Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2000. “Beyond Compare? Women's Movements in Comparative Perspective.” European Journal of Political Research 37 (4): 431–68.Google Scholar
Bereni, Laure. 2007. “French Feminists Renegotiate Republican Universalism: The Gender Parity Campaign.” French Politics 5 (3): 191–209.Google Scholar
Bereni, Laure. 2015. La bataille de la parité: Mobilisations pour la féminisation du pouvoir [The battle of parity: French women struggle for political representation]. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Bereni, Laure, and Revillard, Anne. 2007. “Des quotas à la parité: ‘Féminisme d'Etat’ et représentation politique (1974–2007)” [From quotas to parity: “State feminism” and political representation (1974–2007)]. Genèses 67 (2): 5–23.Google Scholar
Bereni, Laure, and Revillard, Anne. 2012. “A Paradigmatic Social Movement? Women's Movements and the Definition of Contentious Politics.” Sociétés contemporaines 85: 17–41.Google Scholar
Briscoe, Forrest, and Gupta, Abhinav. 2016. “Social Activism in and around Organizations.” Academy of Management Annals 10 (1): 671–727.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2006. “Comparing Institutions: Revealing the ‘Gendered Logic of Appropriateness.’” Politics & Gender 2 (2): 223–35.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2010. “Comparative Gender and Institutions: Directions for Research.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 183–89.Google Scholar
Clemens, Elisabeth S. 1993. “Organizational Repertoires and Institutional Changes: Women's Groups and the Transformation of U.S. Politics, 1890–1920.” American Journal of Sociology 98 (4): 755–98.Google Scholar
Costain, Anne N., and McFarland, Andrew S., eds. 1998. Social Movements and American Political Institutions. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dauphin, Sandrine. 2010. L'Etat et les droits des femmes: Des institutions au service de l’égalité? [The state and women's rights: Institutions serving equality?]. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes/Archives du féminisme.Google Scholar
Delage, Pauline. 2017. Violences conjugales: Du combat feministe a la cause publique [Domestic violence: From feminist struggle to public cause]. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Hester. 1995. “The Australian Femocratic Experiment: A Feminist Case for Bureaucracy.” In Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women's Movement, eds. Ferree, Myra Marx and Martin, Patricia Yancey. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 69–83.Google Scholar
Evans, Sara M., and Boyte, Harry C.. 1986. Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Kathy E. 1984. The Feminist Case against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx, and Mueller, Carol McClurg. 2004. “Feminism and the Women's Movement: A Global Perspective.” In The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, eds. Snow, David A., Soule, Sarah A., and Kriesi, Hanspeter. Oxford: Blackwell, 576–607.Google Scholar
Fillieule, Olivier. 2009. “De l'objet de la définition à la définition de l'objet: De quoi traite finalement la sociologie des mouvements sociaux?” [From the object of the definition to the definition of the object: What is social movement theory about?]. Politique et Société 28 (1): 15–26.Google Scholar
Franzway, Suzanne, Court, Dianne, and Connell, R. W.. 1989. Staking a Claim: Feminism, Bureaucracy, and the State. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Gelb, Joyce, and Hart, Vivien. 1999. “Feminist Politics in a Hostile Environment: Obstacles and Opportunities.” In How Social Movements Matter, eds. Giugni, Marco, McAdam, Doug, and Tilly, Charles. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 149–81.Google Scholar
Giugni, Marco G., and Passy, Florence. 1998. “Contentious Politics in Complex Societies: New Social Movements between Conflict and Cooperation.” In From Contention to Democracy, eds. Giugni, Marco G., McAdam, Doug, and Tilly, Charles. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 81–108.Google Scholar
Haalsa, Beatrice. 1991. Policies and Strategies on Women in Norway: The Role of Women's Organisations, Political Parties and the Government. Lillehammer: Oppland Distriktshogskole.Google Scholar
Hern, Erin. 2017. “The Trouble with Institutions: How Women's Policy Machineries Can Undermine Women's Mass Participation.” Politics & Gender 13 (3): 405–31.Google Scholar
Hernes, Helga. 1987. Welfare State and Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
Holli, Anne Maria. 2008. “Feminist Triangles: A Conceptual Analysis.” Representation 44 (2): 169–85.Google Scholar
Jenson, Jane, and Sineau, Mariette. 1995. Mitterrand et les Françaises: Un rendez-vous manqué [Mitterrand and French women: A missed opportunity]. Paris: Presses de la fondation nationale de sciences politiques.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1998a. Faithful and Fearless: Moving Feminist Protest inside the Church and the Military. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod. 1998b. “Stepsisters: Feminist Movement Activism in Different Institutional Spaces.” In The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century, eds. Meyer, David S. and Tarrow, Sidney. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 195–216.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and Mackay, Fiona, eds. 2010. Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lépinard, Éléonore. 2007. L’égalité introuvable: La parité, les féministes et la République [Untraceable equality: Parity, feminists and the Republic]. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
Mackay, Fiona. 2014. “Nested Newness, Institutional Innovation, and the Gendered Limits of Change.” Politics & Gender 10 (4): 549–71.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1995. “What Is the Feminist Movement?” In Feminist Organizations: Harvest of the New Women's Movement, ed. Ferree, Myra Marx. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 27–34.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy G. 1995. Gender Bias and the State: Symbolic Reform at Work in Fifth Republic France. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy G. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mazur, Amy G., and McBride, Dorothy E.. 2007. “State Feminism since the 1980s: From Loose Notion to Operationalized Concept.” Politics & Gender 3 (4): 501–13.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McBride, Dorothy E., Mazur, Amy G., and Lovenduski, Joni, eds. 2010. The Politics of State Feminism: Innovation in Comparative Research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, David S., and Tarrow, Sidney, eds. 1998. The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Meyerson, Debra E., and Scully, Maureen A.. 1995. “Tempered Radicalism and the Politics of Ambivalence and Change.” Organization Science 6 (5): 585–600.Google Scholar
Outshoorn, Joyce. 1994. “Between Movement and Government: Femocrats in the Netherlands.” Schweizerisches Jahrbuch für Politische Wissenschaft 34: 141–63.Google Scholar
Pavard, Bibia. 2012. Si Je Veux, Quand Je Veux: Contraception et Avortement Dans La Société Française (1956–1979) [If I want, when I want: Birth control and abortion in French society (1956–1979)]. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Revillard, Anne. 2009. “L'expertise critique, force d'une institution faible? Le Comité du travail féminin et la genèse d'une politique d’égalité professionnelle en France (1965–1983)” [Critical expertise: The strength of a weak institution? The Women's Labor Committee and the origin of equal employment opportunity in France (1965–1983)]. Revue française de science politique 59 (2): 279–300.Google Scholar
Revillard, Anne. 2016. La cause des femmes dans l'Etat: Une comparaison France-Québec [Stating women's advocacy: A France-Quebec comparison]. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Santoro, Wayne A., and McGuire, Gail M.. 1997. “Social Movement Insiders: The Role of Institutional Activists in State Affirmative Action and Comparable Worth Policies.” Social Problems 44 (4): 503–19.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 1990. Sisters in Suits: Women and Public Policy in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 2010. “Premature Obituaries: How Can We Tell If the Women's Movement Is Over?” Politics & Gender 6 (4): 602–9.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 2013. “Finding The Women's Movement.” In The Women's Movement in Protest, Institutions and the Internet: Australia in Transnational Perspective, eds. Sawer, Marian and Maddison, Sarah. London: Routledge, 1–19.Google Scholar
Skrentny, John D. 2002. The Minority Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Soule, Sarah A., and Earl, Jennifer. 2005. “A Movement Society Evaluated: Collective Protest in the United States, 1960–1986.” Mobilization 10: 345–64.Google Scholar
Stetson, Dorothy McBride, and Mazur, Amy G., eds. 1995. Comparative State Feminism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Taylor, Verta. 1989. “Social Movement Continuity: The Women's Movement in Abeyance.” American Sociological Review 54 (5): 761–75.Google Scholar
Thörn, Håkan, and Svenberg, Sebastian. 2016. “‘We Feel the Responsibility That You Shirk’: Movement Institutionalization, the Politics of Responsibility and the Case of the Swedish Environmental Movement.” Social Movement Studies 15 (6): 593–609.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1986. The Contentious French. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Valiente, Celia. 2007. “Developing Countries and New Democracies Matter: An Overview of Research on State Feminism Worldwide.” Politics & Gender 3 (4): 530–41.Google Scholar
Vargas, Virginia, and Wieringa, Saskia. 1998. “The Triangle of Empowerment. Processes and Actors in the Making of Public Policy for Women.” In Women's Movements and Public Policy in Europe, Latin America, and the Caribbean, eds. Nijeholt, Geertje Lycklama à, Vargas, Virginia, and Wieringa, Saskia. New York: Garland, 3–23.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, Imrat, and Duyvendak, Jan Willem. 2017. “Understanding Governmental Activism.” Social Movement Studies 16 (5): 564–77.Google Scholar
Watson, Sophie, ed. 1990. Playing the State: Australian Feminist Interventions. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 1998. “Gender, Feminism and the State: An Overview.” In Gender, Politics, and the State, eds. Randall, Vicky and Waylen, Georgina. London: Routledge, 1–17.Google Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–74.Google Scholar
Woodward, Alison. 2003. “Building Velvet Triangles: Gender and Informal Governance.” In Informal Governance in the European Union, eds. Christiansen, Thomas and Piattoni, Simona. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 76–93.Google Scholar