Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:57:14.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modernization and Gender Equality: A Response to Adams and Orloff

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2006

Ronald Inglehart  and
Pippa Norris
Ronald Inglehart
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Pippa Norris
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Julia Adams and Ann Shola Orloff's insightful critical perspective in the first issue of this journal makes several important points about the relationship between modernization and gender equality. We agree with Adams and Orloff that—despite strong claims to the contrary (e.g., Young 2003)—modernization tends to be conducive to gender equality. And we also agree that the classic versions of modernization theory were inadequate. The basic insight that economic and technological development tends to bring coherent patterns of social and political change holds up well in the light of a large body of recent evidence; but previous models of modernization were mechanical and linear, and they omitted cultural factors that cannot be ignored. We join forces with Adams and Orloff in striving to develop a more adequate concept of modernization, recognizing that understanding ongoing processes of socioeconomic change is a long-term task that will need input from many perspectives.

Type
CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON GENDER AND POLITICS
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 2005 , pp. 482 - 492
Copyright
© 2005 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Julia, Elisabeth S. Clemens, and Ann Shola Orloff, eds. 2005. Remaking Modernity: Politics, History and Sociology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Adams, Julia, and Ann Shola Orloff. 2005. “Defending Modernity? High Politics, Feminist Anti-Modernism, and the Place of Gender.” Politics & Gender 1 (March): 166–82.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Wayne Baker. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review 65 (February): 19–51.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Pippa Norris. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Inglehart, Ronald, and Christian Welzel. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
United Nations. 2000. Human Development Report. New York: Oxford University Press.
Young, Iris Marion. 2003. “The Logic of Masculinist Protection: Reflections on the Current Security State.” Signs 29 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar