Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T11:07:56.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Looking Forward, Conceptualizing Feminist Security Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2012

Laura Sjoberg
Laura Sjoberg
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In previous work, I characterized Feminist Security Studies as pluralistic, but transformative:

Research in Feminist Security Studies reformulates mainstream approaches to traditional security issues, foregrounds the roles of women and gender in conflict and conflict resolution, and reveals the blindness of security studies to issues that taking gender seriously shows as relevant to thinking about security. Together, these works, as a research program, show that gender analysis is necessary, conceptually, for understanding international security, important for analyzing causes and predicting outcomes, and essential to thinking about solutions and promoting positive change in the security realm. (Sjoberg 2009a, 184; see also Sjoberg 2006, 2009b; Sjoberg and Martin 2010.)

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 2011 , pp. 600 - 604
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alker, Hayward. 1996. Rediscoveries and Reformulations: Humanistic Methodologies for International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alker, Hayward, and Biersteker, Thomas. 1984. “The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archeologist of International Savoir Faire.” International Studies Quarterly 28: 121–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Confortini, Catia, and Laura, Sjoberg, 2010. “The Power of Peace.” Paper Presented at the Consortium for Gender, Security, and Human Rights, the University of Massachusetts, Boston, November 2, 2010.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 2009. “Women, the State, and War.” International Relations 23 (2): 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlin-Bennett, Renee, ed. 2011. Unbounded IR: An Alkerian Approach to Global Studies in an Interconnected World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2006. Gender, Justice, and the Wars in Iraq. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2009a. “Introduction to Security Studies: Feminist Contributions.” Security Studies 18 (2): 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura, ed. 2009b. Gender and International Security: Feminist Perspectives. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2009c. “Feminism and Styles of Political Leadership.” In Companion to Political Leadership, ed. Molchanov, Mikhail, Masciulli, Joe, and Knight, W. Andy. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2010a. “Gendering the Empire's Soldiers.” In Gender, War, and Militarism: Feminist Perspectives, ed. Sjoberg, Laura and Via, Sandra. Santa Barbara: Praeger Security International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2010b. “Women and the Genocidal Rape of Other Women: Gendered Dynamics of Gendered War Crimes.” In Confronting Gender Justice: Women's Lives, Human Rights, ed. Bergofen, D., Gilbert, P. R., Harvey, T. and McNeely, C. L.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2010c. “Women Fighters and the ‘Beautiful Soul’ Narrative.” International Review of the Red Cross 92 (877): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2011a. “Women, the State, and War Redux,” International Relations 25 (1): 108–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2011b. “The Paradox of Double Effect,” Women's Policy Journal 7.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2011c. “Arguing Gender and IR: A Dialectical-Hermeneutic Approach,” In Unbounded IR: An Alkerian Approach to Global Studies in an Interconnected World, ed. Renee, Marlin-Bennett. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2012. Gendering Global Conflict: Towards a Feminist Theory of War. New York: Columbia University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura, and Gentry, Caron. 2007. Mothers, Monsters, Whores: Women's Violence in Global Politics. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura, and Gentry, Caron. 2008a. “Reduced to Bad Sex: Narratives of Violent Women from the Bible to the War on Terror.” International Relations 22 (1): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura, and Gentry, Caron. 2008b. “Profiling Terror: Gendering the Strategic Logic of Suicide Terror and Other Narratives.” Austrian Journal of Political Science 2: 181–96.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura, and Gentry, Caron, eds. 2011. Women, Gender, and 21st Century Terrorism. Athens: University of Georgia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura, and Martin, Jillian. 2010. “Feminist Security Theorizing.” In International Studies Encyclopedia, ed. Denemark, R.. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura, and Shepherd, Laura. 2012. “Trans Bodies in/of War.” Feminist Review 101(July). Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura, and Via, Sandra, eds. 2010. Gender, War, and Militarism: Feminist Perspectives. Santa Barbara: Praeger Security International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann, and Sjoberg, Laura. 2010. “Feminism.” In International Relations Theories, ed. Smith, S., Dunne, T., and Kurki, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann, and Sjoberg, Laura, eds. 2011. Feminism and International Relations: Conversations about the Past, Present, and Future. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Man, the State, and War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
White, Stephen. 2000. Sustaining Affirmation: The Strengths of Weak Ontology in Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar