Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:47:01.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Feminist Strategies: Strengths and Challenges of the Rights-Based Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2013

Susanne Zwingel
Susanne Zwingel*
Affiliation:
SUNY Postdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Claiming the rights of women in a world of blatant gender hierarchies is an international feminist strategy that has been around for a long time. Rhetorically, it has been part of the human rights framework since its very inception, as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 already contains important elements of gender equality, thanks to the lobbying efforts of a handful of women's rights advocates at the time. But it took the wave of global consciousness regarding gender inequality that swept the world in the 1970s to make women's rights relevant enough to codify them in a human rights treaty: the 1979 Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). A decade and a half later, the Vienna Conference on Human Rights (1993) coined the slogan “women's rights are human rights” and thus emphasized the centrality of women's experiences for a holistic understanding of human rights. In the time since then, the human rights discourse has become increasingly intersectional and inclusive. While the scope and content of human rights remain contested, many women's rights activists around the world rely on this framework in their struggles for global justice.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 344 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Buss, Doris E. 2004. “The Christian Right, Globalization, and the ‘Natural Family.’” In Gods, Guns, and Globalization. Religious Radicalism and the International Political Economy, ed. Tétreault, Mary Ann and Denemark, Robert A.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 57–77.Google Scholar
Carey, Sabine C., Gibney, Mark, and Poe, Steven C.. 2010. The Politics of Human Rights. The Quest for Dignity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, Hillary. 2013. “International Human Rights Law: A Portmanteau for Feminist Norms?” In Feminist Strategies in International Governance, ed. Caglar, Gülay, Prügl, Elisabeth, and Zwingel, Susanne. New York and London: Routledge, 21–36.Google Scholar
Gray, Mark M., Kittilson, Miki Caul, and Sandholtz, Wayne. 2006. “Women and Globalization: A Study of 180 Countries, 1975–2000.” International Organization 60 (2): 293–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Tsutsui, Kiyoteru, and Meyer, John W.. 2008. “International Human Rights Law and the Politics of Legitimation. Repressive States and Human Rights Treaties.” International Sociology 23(1): 115–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keefe, Patrick Radden. 2012. “Reversal of Fortune.” The New Yorker, January 9, 2012. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/01/09/120109fa_fact_keefe (accessed June 8, 2013).Google Scholar
Sanders, Douglas. 2009. “Sexual and Gender Diversity.” In Encyclopedia of Human Rights, ed. Forsythe, David P.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 433–45.Google Scholar
Zwingel, Susanne. 2013. “Translating International Women's Rights Norms: The CEDAW Convention in Context.” In Feminist Strategies in International Governance, ed. Caglar, Gülay, Prügl, Elisabeth, and Zwingel, Susanne. New York: Routledge, 111–126.Google Scholar