Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:53:48.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Gender Regime of Political Parties: Feedback Effects between “Supply” and “Demand”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2015

Tània Verge*
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Extract

Is women's chronic minority status worldwide explained by a lack of women wishing to stand for political office or by party selectors’ disinterest in selecting women candidates? This debate continues among gender politics scholars; however, an increasing number of studies highlight the need to further investigate how the demands of party selectors might shape the supply of women candidates, especially in strong parliamentary democracies where political parties are the key gatekeepers (Kenny 2013; Murray 2010). This concern was already present in Norris and Lovenduski's (1995) original model, which called for a deeper examination of the “interaction effects” between “supply” and “demand.” In engaging with this call, I argue that the constraining effects of supply are reinforced not only by the demands of party selectors, but also by the everyday (gendered) functioning of political parties, which helps us understand the differential chances of women and men eventually becoming candidates.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bjarnegård, Elin. 2013. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment: Explaining Male Dominance in Parliamentary Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowlkes, Diane L., Perkins, Jerry, and Rinehart, Sue Tolleson. 1979. “Gender Roles and Party Roles.” American Political Science Review 73 (3): 772–80.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan. 2005. Women and Politics in Chile. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2012. “Themes and Implications for Future Research on Gender Quotas.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, ed. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona L., and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y., and Rahat, Gideon. 2010. Democracy within Parties. Candidate Selection Methods and their Political Consequences. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Farah, Barbara G.. 1981. “Social Roles and Political Resources: An Over-Time Study of Men and Women in Party Elites.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (3): 462–82.Google Scholar
Kenny, Meryl. 2013. Gender and Political Recruitment: Theorizing Institutional Change. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni, and Norris, Pippa, eds. 1993. Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Murray, Rainbow. 2010. Parties, Gender Quotas and Candidate Selection in France. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Puwar, Nirmal. 2004. “Thinking About Making a Difference.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (1): 6580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verge, Tània. 2009. Dones a les institucions polítiques catalanes: El llarg camí cap a la igualtat (1977–2008). Barcelona: Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials.Google Scholar
Verge, Tània, and de la Fuente, Maria. 2014. “Playing with Different Cards: Party Politics, Gender Quotas and Women's Empowerment.” International Political Science Review 35 (1): 6779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar