Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:00:04.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender, Race, Ethnicity, and Political Representation in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2012

Michael D. Minta
Michael D. Minta*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri–Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the Concept of Representation, Hanna Pitkin (1967) argues that legislators should be judged by their actions—substantive representation—and not just their closeness in characteristics to their constituents—descriptive representation. Pitkin's theoretical framework is the standard that political representation scholars use when evaluating whether the presence of women or racial and ethnic minorities in legislatures results in greater responsiveness to female or minority interests. Do female legislators better represent the interests of women in U.S. congressional committee hearings on domestic violence than male legislators? Are minority legislators more active in advocating for minority interests than white legislators in hearings relating to racial profiling? Although Pitkin is skeptical that descriptive representatives alone improve legislators' responsiveness to the interests of constituents that they descriptively represent, extensive normative and empirical analyses focusing on race and gender have demonstrated that it is not a question of whether descriptive representation matters, but rather when and how it matters to improving substantive representation (see, for example, Bratton 2005; Canon 1999; Casellas 2011; Gamble 2007; Gay 2001; Grose 2011; Haynie 2001; Lublin 1997; Mansbridge 1999; Tate 2003; Thomas 1994; Whitby 1997).

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 541 - 547
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bratton, Kathleen A. 2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics & Gender 1 (1): 97–125.Google Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Haynie, Kerry L.. 1999. “Agenda-Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 658–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., Haynie, Kerry L., and Reingold, Beth. 2006. “Agenda Setting and African-American Women in State Legislatures.” In Intersectionality and Politics: Recent Research on Gender, Race, and Political Representation in the United States, ed. Hardy-Fanta, Carol. New York: Hayworth Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Nadia. 2010. The Intersection of Race and Gender on Representation—Black Women Legislators' Impact on Legislation. Ph.D. diss. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
Canon, David T. 1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Casellas, Jason. 2011. Latino Representation in State Houses and Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, Sarah Childs, Johanna Kantola, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2008. “Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation.” Representation 44 (2): 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2008. “Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation.” Political Studies 56 (3): 725–36.Google Scholar
Cohen, Cathy J. 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, Jocelyn E. 2004. “When Tokens Matter.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (1):109–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodson, Debra, and Carroll, Sue. 1991. Reshaping the Agenda: Women in State Legislatures. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for American Women and Politics.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 2003. Going Home: Black Representatives and Their Constituents. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, Katrina L. 2007. “Black Political Representation: An Examination of Legislative Activity within U.S. House Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (3): 421–47.Google Scholar
Gay, Claudine. 2001. “The Effect of Black Congressional Representation on Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 95 (3): 589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, Christian. 2011. Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2004. The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529–50.Google Scholar
Haynie, Kerry L. 2001. African American Legislators in the American States. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Melanie. 2011. “Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women's Political Representation Worldwide.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 604–20.Google Scholar
Kanthak, Kristin, and Krause, George A.. 2010. “Valuing Diversity in Political Organizations: Gender and Token Minorities in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 839–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent Yes.” The Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.Google Scholar
Minta, Michael D. 2011. Oversight: Representing the Interests of Blacks and Latinos in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Minta, Michael D., and Brown, Nadia. 2012. “Diverse Memberships and Congressional Attention to Women's Interests.” Presented at the 2012 Southern Political Science Conference, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Minta, Michael D., and Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. 2012. “Diversity in Political Institutions and Congressional Responsiveness to Minority Interests.” Political Research Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1065912911431245.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reingold, Beth, and Smith, Adrienne R.. 2012. “Welfare Policymaking and Intersections of Race, Ethnicity, and Gender in U.S. State Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (1): 131–47.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Gabriel R. 2006. “The Role of Group Consciousness in Latino Public Opinion.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (3): 435–46.Google Scholar
Simien, Evelyn M. 2006. Black Feminist Voices in Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Smooth, Wendy G. 2006. “Intersectionality in Electoral Politics: A Mess Worth Making.” Politics & Gender 2 (3): 400–14.Google Scholar
Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class, and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitby, Kenny J. 1997. The Color of Representation: Congressional Behavior and Black Interests. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar