Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:39:03.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminist Thoughts on Freedom and Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2012

Nancy J. Hirschmann
Nancy J. Hirschmann
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

My contention in this brief essay is that disability is a feminist issue with particular significance for freedom. There are two “models” for understanding disability. The “medical model of disability” has been the dominant view since the Enlightenment, when advances in science and medicine created the realization that humans can intervene in the body to overcome disease (Stiker 1999). In this model, disability is seen as an individual condition arising from a flawed body, which presents a “problem” that must be “fixed” or “cured.” The problem is intrinsic to the body, which must adapt to the preexisting environment. Disability is viewed as a loss, even a tragedy, that the person wants to escape, the appropriate response to which is pity; the less appropriate but more common response is repulsion.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 216 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berlin, Isaiah. 1971. “Two Concepts of Liberty,” In Four Essays on Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flathman, Richard. 1987. The Philosophy and Politics of Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2003. The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2008. Gender, Class, and Freedom in Modern Political Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kristjansson, Kristjan. 1992. “What Is Wrong with Positive Liberty?” Social Theory and Practice 18 (3): 289–310.Google Scholar
Linker, Beth. 2011. War's Waste: Rehabilitation in World War I America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1996. “Some Thoughts Concerning Education.” In Some Thoughts Concerning Education and of the Conduct of the Understanding eds. Grant, Ruth W. and Tarcov, Nathan. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Smith, Kerri. 2011. “Taking Aim at Free Will,” Nature 477 (September): 23–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stiker, Henri-Jacques. 1999. History of Disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris. 1980. “Throwing like a Girl: A Phenomenlogy of Female Body Comportment, Motility, and Spatiality.” Human Studies 3 (2): 137–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zita, Jacquelyne. 1992. “Male Lesbians and the Postmodern Body.” Hypatia 7 (4): 106–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar