Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:29:57.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminist and Gender-Neutral Frames in Contemporary Child-Care and Anti-Violence Policy Debates in Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2012

Cheryl N. Collier
Cheryl N. Collier
Affiliation:
University of Windsor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Pressure to make policy issues gender neutral, as in the cases of policy debates concerning child care and anti-violence against women, had initially been put onto public policy agendas by feminist advocates. The broader influence of neoliberalism and post-neoliberalism (also known as the social-investment perspective) in Canada has amplified this trend. Global trends toward neoliberalism encouraged less state involvement and reduced public spending on the welfare state from the 1980s into the 1990s, with detrimental effects on women's policy. Moreover, feminist women's groups and women's issues were increasingly labeled “special interests”; advocacy claims toward the state were routinely delegitimized by successive provincial and federal governments, although this trend was less pronounced under left-wing regimes than right-wing ones (Collier 2006; 2009). As Canada entered the new millennium, many social-policy researchers identified a renewed state interest in reinvestment in social programs to position the state better in a competitive global marketplace. This newer shift toward the “social-investment perspective” is alleged to have consciously erased gender from social policy debates, particularly in the child-care arena (see Jenson 2009).

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 283 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bacchi, Carol. 2000. “Policy as Discourse: What Does It Mean? Where Does It Get Us?” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 21 (1): 45–57.Google Scholar
BC MWE (British Columbia Ministry of Women's Equality). 1998. Contributing to the Solution: A Symposium on Preventing Violence Against Women. Victoria: BC MWE.Google Scholar
Benford, Robert D., and Snow, David A.. 2000. “Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment.” Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callahan, Marilyn, Cronin, Lynda, Larose, Lori, Lund, Brishkai, MacPherson, Glenda, and Savage, Carol. 1984. Conference Report: Women in Crisis. Victoria: Crisis Services for Women in B.C.Google Scholar
Cataldi, Sue L. 1995. “Reflections on ‘Male Bashing.’” National Women's Studies Association Journal 7 (2): 76–85.Google Scholar
Cleveland, Gordon, and Krashinsky, Michael. 2000. Our Children's Future: Child Care Policy in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marcy, Duggan, Nancy, Sayre, Carol, Todd, Barbara, and Wright, Nikki. 1973. Cuz there ain't no daycare (or almost none, she said): A Book about Daycare in BC. Vancouver: Press Gang Publishers. Accessible from the Vancouver File, Women's Movement Archives (WMA), Box 26.Google Scholar
Collier, Cheryl N. 2006. “Governments and Women's Movements: Explaining Child Care and Anti-Violence Policy in Ontario and British Columbia, 1970–2000.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Collier, Cheryl N.. 2009. “Violence Against Women or Violence Against ‘People’? Neoliberalism, ‘Post-neoliberalism’ and Anti-violence Policy in Ontario and British Columbia.” In Women and Public Policy in Canada, ed. Alexandra, Dobrowolsky.Don Mills, Canada: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dobrowolsky, Alexandra, and Jenson, Jane. 2004. “Shifting Representations of Citizenship: Canadian Politics of ‘Women’ and ‘Children.’” Social Politics 11 (2): 154–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gornick, Janet C. 1999. “Gender Equality in the Labour Market: Women's Employment and Earnings.” Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper no. 206. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Heitlinger, Alana. 1993. Women's Equality, Demography and Public Policies: A Comparative Perspective. New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jay, Suzanne. 2000. “British Columbia Anti-Violence Workers Recommendations for Change.” Canadian Women's Studies 20 (3): 160–64.Google Scholar
Jenson, Jane. 2009. “Writing Gender Out: The Continuing Effects of the Social Investment Perspective.” In Women and Public Policy in Canada, ed. Dobrowolsky, Alexandra. Don Mills, Canada: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kulawik, Teresa. 2009. “Staking the Frame of a Feminist Discursive Institutionalism.” Politics & Gender 5 (2): 262–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyle, Irene, et al. 1991. “Ontario Report.” In Canadian National Child Care Study: Canadian Child Care in Context: Perspectives from the Provinces and Territories, ed. Pence, Alan R.. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Lazar, Michelle M. 2007. “Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis.” Critical Discourse Studies 4 (2): 141–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardo, Emanuela, and Meier, Petra. 2006. “Gender Mainstreaming in the EU.” European Journal of Women's Studies 13 (2): 151–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardo, Emanuela, Meier, Petra, and Verloo, Meike. 2010. “Discursive Dynamics in Gender Equality Politics: What about ‘Feminist Taboos’?” European Journal of Women's Studies 17 (2): 105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAGEEQ Project. N.d. Policy Frames and Implementation Problems: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming. Available at: http://www.mageeq.net.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne. 2002. “Introduction: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring: Through the Lens of Child Care.” In Child Care Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, ed. Mahon, Rianne and Michel, Sonya. New York: Routledge. 1–27.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne. 2009. “Childcare and Varieties of Liberalism in Canada.” In Women and Public Policy in Canada, ed. Dobrowolsky, Alexandra. Don Mills, Canada: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne, and Collier, Cheryl. 2010. “Navigating the Shoals of Canadian Federalism: Child Care Advocacy.” In Feminism, Federalism and Multi-level Governance, ed. Vickers, Jill, Sawyer, Marian, and Haussman, Melissa. Ashgate: Surrey.Google Scholar
Michel, Sonya. 2002. “Dilemmas of Child Care.” In Child Care Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring, ed. Mahon, Rianne and Michel, Sonya. New York: Routledge. 333–38.Google Scholar
Mustard, Fraser, and McCain, Margaret. 1999. Reversing the Real Brain Drain: Early Years Study: Final Report. Ottawa: Canadian Institute for Advanced Research.Google Scholar
Newman, Jacquetta, and White, Linda. 2006. Women, Politics, and Public Policy: The Political Struggles of Canadian Women. Don Mills, Canada: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Terry. 2002. “Lady Justice Gets Back Her Blindfold: The B.C. Government Prepares to Dump Anti-male Spousal-Abuse Policies.” Report Newsmagazine 29 (14): 32.Google Scholar
Prentice, Susan. 1987. “The Politics of Care: Childcare in Ontario.” Unpublished Masters of Environmental Studies paper, York University/CCRRU, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Price, Lisa. 1988. “In Women's Interests: Feminist Activism and Institutional Change.” Vancouver: Women's Research Centre. Accessible from WAVAW Vancouver File, WMA, Box 131.Google Scholar
Rein, Martin, and Schon, Donald. 1991. “Frame-Reflective Policy Discourse.” In Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads, ed. Wagner, Peter, Weiss, Carol Hirschon, Wittrock, Björn, and Wollmann, Helmut. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
RCSW (Royal Commission on the Status of Women). 1970. Report of the Royal Commission on the Status of Women. Ottawa: RCSW.Google Scholar
Verloo, Meike. 2005. “Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Europe: A Critical Frame Analysis Approach.” Greek Review of Social Research 117 (B): 11–34.Google Scholar
Vickers, Jill. 1997. Reinventing Political Science: A Feminist Approach. Halifax: Fernwood.Google Scholar
Walker, Gillian A. 1990. Family Violence and the Women's Movement: The Conceptual Politics of Struggle. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. Protest, Policy and the Problem of Violence Against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Linda A. 2001. “From Ideal to Pragmatic Politics: National Child Care Advocacy Groups in the 1980s and 1990s” ed. Prentice, Susan. Changing Child Care: Five Decades of Child Care Advocacy and Policy in Canada. Halifax: Fernwood. 97–115.Google Scholar
WAVAW (Women Against Violence Against Women). 1981. “WAVAW Statement of Perspective and Intent.” WAVAW 1979, 1981, 1982, 1983, and 1984, Toronto File, WMA, Box 131.Google Scholar
Young, Lisa. 2000. Feminists and Party Politics. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar