Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:54:25.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Familiar Theories from a New Perspective: The Implications of a Longitudinal Approach to Women in Politics Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2007

Melanie M. Hughes  and
Pamela Paxton
Melanie M. Hughes
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Pamela Paxton
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Women continue to be underrepresented in politics. A contemporary focus on inequality, however, belies the remarkable changes that have occurred in women's political representation, participation, and impact over time. Thus, scholars are increasingly calling for longitudinal theory and research that focuses on change across time. In this essay, we advocate moving to a longitudinal approach, which, we argue, has four broad implications for theories on women and politics. First, in shifting from a static to a longitudinal perspective, we may find greater support for existing theories that have to date generated only weak or mixed empirical evidence. Second, in contrast, we may also identify limitations of documented findings, which may not generalize broadly across time. Third, some theories imply over-time processes but have never been modeled as such. Thus, a longitudinal approach promises new, and potentially more rigorous, hypothesis testing of existing theories. Finally, theorizing over time may generate new explanations for stasis, growth, or decline in women's political representation or participation that have not, to date, been considered.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 370 - 378
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arceneaux, Kevin. 2001. “The ‘Gender Gap’ in State Legislative Representation: New Data to Tackle an Old Question.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 143–60.Google Scholar
Baldez, Lisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: The Gender Quota Law for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (May): 231–58.Google Scholar
Berkovitch, Nitza. 1999. From Motherhood to Citizenship: Women's Rights and International Organizations. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Haynie, Kerry L.. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effects of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 658–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Francis, and Mair, Peter. 1984. “Left–right Political Scales: Some ‘Expert’ Judgments.” European Journal of Political Science 12 (4): 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caul, Miki. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caul, Miki. 2001. “Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-National Analysis.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1214–29.Google Scholar
CAWP (Center for the American Woman and Politics). 2001. “Women State Legislators: Past, Present, and Future.” New Brunswick, NJ: Center for the American Woman and Politics.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, ed. 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
D'Itri, Patricia Ward. 1999. Cross Currents in the International Women's Movement, 1848–1948. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green University Popular Press.Google Scholar
Dolan, Julie, Deckman, Melissa, and Swers, Michele. 2007. Women and Politics: Paths to Power and Influence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gerrity, Jessica C., Osborn, Tracy, and Mendez, Jeanette Morehouse. 2007. “Women and Representation: A Different View of the District?” Politics & Gender 3 (June): 3 (2): 179–200.Google Scholar
Gray, Mark M., Kittilson, Miki Caul, and Sandholtz, Wayne. 2006. “Women and. Globalization: A Study of 180 Countries, 1975–2000.” International Organization 60 (2): 293–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2000. “The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women's and Men's Voting Behavior in Global Perspective.” International Political Science Review 21 (4): 441–63.Google Scholar
IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 2007. “Women in National Parliaments.” http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htmGoogle Scholar
Kenworthy, Lane, and Malami, Melissa. 1999. “Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis.” Social Forces 78 (1): 235–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klausen, Jytte. 2001. “When Women Voted for the Right: Lessons for Today From the Conservative Gender Gap.” In Has Liberalism Failed Women: Assuring Equal Representation in Europe and the United States, ed. Klausen, Jytte and Maier, Charles S.. New York: Palgrave, 209–28.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2007. Forthcoming. “Candidate Gender Quotas: A Framework for Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunovich, Sheri, and Paxton, Pamela. 2005. “Pathways to Power: The Role of Political Parties in Women's National Political Representation.” American Journal of Sociology 111 (2): 505–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M. 1960. Political Man. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 1993. “Introduction: The Dynamics of Gender and Party.” In Gender and Party Politics, ed. Lovenduski, Joni and Norris, Pippa. London: Sage, 1–15.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E. 1993. “Institutional Variables Affecting Female Representation in National Legislatures: The Case of Norway.” Journal of Politics 55 (3): 737–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matland, Richard E., and Brown, Deborah D.. 1992. “District Magnitude's Effect on Female Representation in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (4): 469–92.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E., and Studlar, Donley T.. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Systems: Canada and Norway.” Journal of Politics 58 (3): 707–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Michael D., Mendes, Silvia M., and Kim, Myunghee. 2007. “Cross-temporal and Cross-national Comparisons of Party Left–Right Positions. Electoral Studies 26 (1): 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (1): 144–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrander, Barbara, and Wilcox, Clyde. 2005. “Change and Continuity in the Geography of Women State Legislators.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, 2d ed. , ed. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 176–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment:  Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oxley, Zoe M., and Fox, Richard L.. 2004. “Women in Executive Office: Variation Across American States.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 113–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela. 1997. “Women in National Legislatures: A Cross-National Analysis.” Social Science Research 26 (4): 442–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, and Hughes, Melanie M.. 2007. Women, Politics, and Power: A Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
Paxton, Pamela, Hughes, Melanie M., and Green, Jennifer L.. 2006. “The International Women's Movement and Women's Political Representation, 1893–2003.” American Sociological Review 71 (6): 898–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, Andrew. 1999. “Women in the Legislatures and Executives of the World: Knocking at the Highest Glass Ceiling.” World Politics 51 (July): 547–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, Wilma. 1987. “Electoral Systems, Contextual Factors, and Women's Opportunity for Election to Parliament in Twenty-Three Democracies.” Western Political Quarterly 40 (September): 477–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rule, Wilma. 1999. “Why Are More Women State Legislators?” In Women in Politics: Outsiders or Insiders?, 3d ed., ed. Whitaker, L. D.. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 190–202.Google Scholar
Rupp, Leila J., and Taylor, Verta. 1999. “Forging Feminist Identity in an International Movement: A Collective Identity Approach to Twentieth-Century Feminism.” Signs 24 (2): 363–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. “Political Parties and the Recruitment of Women to State Legislatures.” Journal of Politics 64 (3): 791–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2006. Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 570–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women's Issue Bills Than Their Male Colleagues?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3): 435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 2002. “Transforming the Agenda: Analyzing Gender Differences in Women's Issue Bill Sponsorship.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 260–83.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari, and Kang, Alice. Forthcoming. “The Global Impact of Quotas: The Fast Track to Female Representation.” Comparative Political Studies.Google Scholar