Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:10:44.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethnographic Research in Gendered Organizations: The Case of the Westminster Parliament

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2014

Emma Crewe
Emma Crewe*
Affiliation:
University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Anthropologists and new institutionalist scholars studying politics share an interest in rules, norms, and power. The former tend to agree more closely with those researchers who rely on inductive empiricism rather than deductive research methods, take an historical perspective, and treat ambiguities as part of the study rather than an inconvenience. As Olivier de Sardan argues, those institutionalist approaches that tend to rely on abstract, predetermined structures contrast with the way anthropologists see social norms as emerging out of interaction between people in specific contexts (2014, 288).

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 673 - 678
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acker, Joan. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender and Society 4 (2): 139–58.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1988. Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal 40 (4): 519–31.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2004. “A Feminised Style of Politics? Women MPs in the House of Commons.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6: 3–19.Google Scholar
Crewe, Emma. 2005. Lords of Parliament: Manners, Rituals and Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Crewe, Emma, and Axelby, Richard. 2013. Anthropology and Development: Culture, Morality and Politics in a Globalised World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, Paul. 2012. How to be an MP. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar
Moore, Henrietta. 1994. A Passion for Difference, Essays in Anthropology and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Olivier de Sardan, Jean-Pierre. 2014. “Embeddedness and Informal Norms: Institutionalisms and Anthropology.” Critique of Anthropology 33 (3): 280–99.Google Scholar
Shaw, Sylvia, 2000. “Language, Gender and Apportionment in Political Debates.” Discourse and Society 11 (3): 401–18.Google Scholar