Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:44:06.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Non-Quota Strategy Matter? A Comparative Study on Candidate Selection and Women's Representation at the Local Level in Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2019

Florian Ruf Open the ORCID record for Florian Ruf [Opens in a new window]
Florian Ruf*
Affiliation:
Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The intraparty mechanisms through which parties recruit, motivate, and select their candidates are central explanatory factors for the representation of women. This article analyzes the effects of intraparty factors on women's representation by measuring the impact of (1) parties’ non-quota strategies at the regional level—such as establishing women's sections, mentoring programs, or campaign funding for women—and (2) central party gatekeepers at the local level. Exploiting an original, newly compiled data set consisting of 1,475 electoral lists from the 2014 local council elections in the German state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, this article shows that parties’ non-quota strategies and central gatekeepers play crucial roles in determining the share of women on local party tickets. This means that who runs for office is, in this case, a question of intraparty dynamics. These dynamics are caused by different mechanisms of non-quota strategies and gender-biased candidate selection combined with interparty effects of local party competition and left-party strength. The almost consistent conditions that the subnational level provides show that the parties’ capacities (or lack thereof) for gendered recruitment is one major explanatory factor and should be tested at least in cross-national comparisons.

Keywords

Intraparty mechanismspolitical recruitmentparty gatekeepersnon-quota strategieswomen's representation
Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 74 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association, 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Many thanks to Philipp Gärtner, who helped me collect the data. Also many thanks to Uwe Wagschal, Sebastian Jäckle, Pascal König, Lennart Vogt, and the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments.

References

REFERENCES

Allison, Paul D. 2009. Fixed Effects Regression Models. Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjarnegård, Elin, and Zetterberg, Pär. 2016. “Gender Equality Reforms on an Uneven Playing Field: Candidate Selection and Quota Implementation in Electoral Authoritarian Tanzania.” Government and Opposition 51 (3): 464–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjarnegård, Elin, and Zetterberg, Pär. 2017. “Political Parties, Formal Selection Criteria, and Gendered Parliamentary Representation.” Party Politics. Published online August 28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068817715552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., and Preece, Jessica Robinson. 2016. “Recruitment and Perceptions of Gender Bias in Party Leader Support.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (4): 842–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Susan J., and Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2013. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caul, Miki. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caul, Miki. 2001. “Political Parties and the Adoption of Candidate Gender Quotas: A Cross-national Analysis.” Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1214–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celis, Karen, Childs, Sarah, Kantola, Johanna, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2014. “Constituting Women's Interests through Representative Claims.” Politics & Gender 10 (2): 149–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2010. Women and British Party Politics: Descriptive, Substantive and Symbolic Representation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah L., and Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2016. “Feminizing Political Parties: Women's Party Member Organizations within European Parliamentary Parties.” Party Politics 22 (5): 598–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder-Meyer, Melody. 2013. “Gendered Recruitment without Trying: How Local Party Recruiters Affect Women's Representation.” Politics & Gender 9 (4): 390–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, and Freidenvall, Lenita. 2005. “Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Representation for Women: Why Scandinavia Is No Longer the Model.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 26–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fortin-Rittberger, Jessica, and Rittberger, Berthold. 2015. “Nominating Women for Europe: Exploring the Role of Political Parties’ Recruitment Procedures for European Parliament Elections: Nominating Women for Europe.” European Journal of Political Research 54 (4): 767–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y., and Rahat, Gideon. 2010. Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinelt, Hubert, Magnier, Annick, Cabria, Marcello, and Reynaert, Herwig, eds. 2018. Political Leaders and Changing Local Democracy: The European Mayor. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinojosa, Magda. 2009. “‘Whatever the Party Asks of Me’: Women's Political Representation in Chile's Unión Demócrata Independiente.” Politics & Gender 5 (3): 377–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinojosa, Magda. 2012. Selecting Women, Electing Women: Political Representation and Candidate Selection in Latin America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, Melanie M. 2011. “Intersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women's Political Representation Worldwide.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 604–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayuni, Happy M., and Muriaas, Ragnhild L.. 2014. “Alternatives to Gender Quotas: Electoral Financing of Women Candidates in Malawi.” Representation 50 (3): 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, Meryl, and Verge, Tània. 2016. “Opening Up the Black Box: Gender and Candidate Selection in a New Era.” Government and Opposition 51 (3): 351–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2011. “Women, Parties and Platforms in Post-industrial Democracies.” Party Politics 17 (1): 66–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2010. “Why Are Fewer Women than Men Elected? Gender and the Dynamics of Candidate Selection.” Political Studies Review 8 (2): 155–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2016. “Contesting Gender Quotas: Dynamics of Resistance.” Politics, Groups and Identities 4 (2): 268–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and Norris, Pippa. 2014. “Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office.” Political Studies 62 (1): 2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2005. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Lühiste, Maarja. 2015. “Party Gatekeepers’ Support for Viable Female Candidacy in PR-List Systems.” Politics & Gender 11 (1): 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meserve, Stephen A., Pemstein, Daniel, and Bernhard, William T.. 2018. “Gender, Incumbency, and Party List Nominations.” British Journal of Political Science. Published online June 11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niven, David. 1998. “Party Elites and Women Candidates: The Shape of Bias.” Women & Politics 19 (2): 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, ed. 1997. Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race, and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohmura, Tamaki, Bailer, Stefanie, Meiβner, Peter, and Selb, Peter. 2018. “Party Animals, Career Changers and Other Pathways into Parliament.” West European Politics 41 (1): 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pemstein, Daniel, Meserve, Stephen A., and Bernhard, William T.. 2015. “Brussels Bound: Policy Experience and Candidate Selection in European Elections.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (11): 1421–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruysers, Scott, and Blais, Julie. 2017. “Why Won't Lola Run? An Experiment Examining Stereotype Threat and Political Ambition.” Politics & Gender 13 (2): 232–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruysers, Scott, and Blais, Julie. 2019. “Narcissistic Women and Cash-Strapped Men: Who Can Be Encouraged to Consider Running for Political Office, and Who Should Do the Encouraging?” Political Research Quarterly 72 (1): 229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruysers, Scott, Cross, William P., Gauja, Anika, and Rahat, Gideon. 2017. “Candidate Selection Rules and Democratic Outcomes: The Impact of Parties on Women's Representation.” In Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation, and Power, eds. Scarrow, Susan E., Webb, Paul D., and Poguntke, Thomas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 208–33.Google Scholar
Rahat, Gideon, and Hazan, Reuven Y.. 2001. “Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework.” Party Politics 7 (3): 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adrienne R., Reingold, Beth, and Owens, Michael Leo. 2012. “The Political Determinants of Women's Descriptive Representation in Cities.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (2): 315–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 2001. “Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundström, Aksel, and Stockemer, Daniel. 2015. “What Determines Women's Political Representation at the Local Level? A Fine-Grained Analysis of the European Regions.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 56 (3–4): 254–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Manon, and Pelletier, Réjean. 2001. “More Women Constituency Party Presidents: A Strategy for Increasing the Number of Women Candidates in Canada?” Party Politics 7 (2): 157–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari, and Kang, Alice. 2008. “The Global Impact of Quotas: On the Fast Track to Increased Female Legislative Representation.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (3): 338–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verge, Tània. 2010. “Gendering Representation in Spain: Opportunities and Limits of Gender Quotas.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 31 (2): 166–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verge, Tània. 2018. “Political Party Gender Action Plans: Pushing Gender Change Forward beyond Quotas.” Party Politics. Published online April 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818766196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verge, Tània, and Claveria, Sylvia. 2018. “Gendered Political Resources: The Case of Party Office.” Party Politics 24 (5): 536–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verge, Tània, and de la Fuente, Maria. 2014. “Playing with Different Cards: Party Politics, Gender Quotas and Women's Empowerment.” International Political Science Review 35 (1): 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verge, Tània, and Espírito-Santo, Ana. 2016. “Interactions between Party and Legislative Quotas: Candidate Selection and Quota Compliance in Portugal and Spain.” Government and Opposition 51 (3): 416–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar