No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Continuing the Conversation … Some Reflections
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 November 2017
Extract
The diverse collection of short reflections included in this Critical Perspectives section looks to continue a conversation—a conversation that played out in the pages of this journal (Elias 2015) regarding the relationship between two strands of feminist international relations scholarship: feminist security studies (FSS) and feminist international political economy (IPE). In this forum, the contributors return to some of the same ground, but in doing so, they bring in new concerns and agendas. New empirical sites of thinking through the nexus between security and political economy from a feminist perspective are explored: war, women's lives in postconflict societies, and international security governance institutions and practices.
- Type
- Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2017
References
REFERENCES
Allison, Katherine. 2015. “Feminist Security Studies and Feminist International Political Economy: Considering Feminist Stories.” Politics & Gender
11 (2): 430–34.Google Scholar
Elias, Juanita. 2005. “The Gendered Political Economy of Control and Resistance on the Shop Floor of the Multinational Firm: A Case Study from Malaysia.” New Political Economy
10 (2): 203–22.Google Scholar
Elias, Juanita. 2015. “Introduction: Feminist Security Studies and Feminist Political Economy: Crossing Divides and Rebuilding Bridges.” Politics & Gender
11 (2): 406–8.Google Scholar
Elias, Juanita, and Gunawardana, Samanthi J., eds. 2013. The Global Political Economy of the Household in Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Elias, Juanita, and Rai, Shirin. 2015. “The Everyday Gendered Political Economy of Violence.” Politics & Gender
11 (2): 424–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2015. “Closing Reflection: Militiamen Get Paid; Women Borrowers Get Beaten.” Politics & Gender
11 (2): 435–38.Google Scholar
Griffin, Penny. 2018. “Gender, IPE and Poststructuralism: Problematizing the Material/Discursive Divide.” In The Edward Elgar Handbook of International Political Economy and Gender, eds. Elias, Juanita and Roberts, Adrienne. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Hemming, Clare. 2005. “Telling Feminist Stories.” Feminist Theory
6 (2): 115–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hozic, Aida A., and True, Jacqui, eds. 2016. Scandalous Economics: Gender and the Politics of Financial Crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LeBaron, Genevieve. 2015. “Unfree Labour Beyond Binaries: Hierarchy, Insecurity, and Labor Market Restructuring.” International Feminist Journal of Politics
17 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeBaron, Genevieve, and Roberts, Adrienne. 2012. “Confining Social Insecurity: Neoliberalism and the Rise of the 21st Century Debtor's Prison.” Politics & Gender
8 (1): 25–49.Google Scholar
Montgomerie, Johnna, and Tepe-Belfrage, Daniela. 2016. “A Feminist Moral-Political Economy of Uneven Reform in Austerity Britain: Fostering Financial and Parental Literacy.” Globalizations
13 (6): 890–905.Google Scholar
Prügl, Elisabeth. 2011. “Feminist International Relations.” Politics & Gender
7 (1): 111–16.Google Scholar
Rai, Shirin. 2002. Gender and the Political Economy of Development. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
True, Jacqui. 2012. The Political Economy of Violence against Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar