Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:05:51.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond the “Helpless Nepali Woman” versus the “Fierce Maoist Fighter”: Challenging the Artificial Security/Economy Divide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

Rahel Kunz
Rahel Kunz*
Affiliation:
University of Lausanne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent discussions over similarities and differences between feminist security studies (FSS) and feminist global political economy (FGPE) approaches invite us to reflect on the underlying assumptions about knowledge production within feminist international relations (IR) more broadly (Allison 2015; Enloe 2015; see also the introduction to this forum). I use Nepali women ex-combatants’ life stories to make two specific points relating to these discussions. First, I illustrate how the separation of security and political economy issues cannot fully account for their life experiences. Second, and by way of overcoming this separation, I show how by beginning with life stories, we can develop a holistic analysis that challenges the broader Eurocentric politics of feminist IR knowledge production.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 733 - 739
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allison, Katherine. 2015. “Feminist Security Studies and Feminist International Political Economy: Considering Feminist Stories.” Politics & Gender 11 (2): 430–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
C.P.N. (Maoist). 1996. “Appeal of the C.P.N. (Maoist) to the People.” The Worker, June. http://www.bannedthought.net/Nepal/Worker/Worker-02/AppealToPeople-W02.htm (accessed September 11, 2017).Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2004. The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2015. “Closing Reflection: Militiamen Get Paid; Women Borrowers Get Beaten.” Politics & Gender 11 (2): 435–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautam, Shobha, Banskota, Amrita, and Manchanda, Rita. 2001. “Where There Are No Men: Women in the Maoist Insurgency in Nepal.” In Women, War, and Peace in South Asia: Beyond Victimhood to Agency, ed. Manchanda, Rita. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 214–51.Google Scholar
Grosfoguel, Ramon. 2007. “The Epistemic Decolonial Turn.” Cultural Studies 21 (2/3): 211–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Group, International Crisis. 2005. “Nepal's Maoists: Their Aims, Structure and Strategy.” https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-asia/nepal/nepals-maoists-their-aims-structure-and-strategy (accessed September 11, 2017).Google Scholar
Khadka, Sharada. 2012. “Female Combatants and Ex-Combatants in Maoist Revolution and Their Struggle for Reintegration in Post-War, Nepal.” http://www.ub.uit.no/munin/handle/10037/3980 (accessed September 11, 2017).Google Scholar
Lohani-Chase, Rama S. 2008. “Women and Gender in the Maoist People's War in Nepal: Militarism and Dislocation.” Ph.D. diss., Rutgers University. https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/24422/ (accessed September 11, 2017).Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2010. “Toward a Decolonial Feminism.” Hypatia 25 (4): 742–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mignolo, Walter D. 2012. Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges, and Border Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1984. “Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses.” Boundary 2 12 (3): 333–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettigrew, Judith, and Shneiderman, Sara. 2003. “Women and the Maobaadi: Ideology and Agency in Nepal's Maoist Movement.” Himal South Asian 17 (1): 19–29.Google Scholar
Pigg, Stacy Leigh. 1992. “Inventing Social Categories through Place: Social Representations and Development in Nepal.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 34 (3): 491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamang, Seira. 2011. “The Politics of ‘Developing Nepali Women.’” In Perspectives on Modern South Asia: A Reader in Culture, History, and Representation, ed. Visweswaran, Kamala. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, 280–88.Google Scholar
Tamang, Seira. n.d. “‘Patriarchal Claw Back’: Framing Female Combatants in Nepal's Transition.” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Tickner, J. Ann. 2006. “On the Frontlines or Sidelines of Knowledge and Power? Feminist Practices of Responsible Scholarship.” International Studies Review 8 (3): 383–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen. 1992. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar