Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:57:49.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analyzing Institutional Persistence: The Case of the Ministry of Women's Affairs in Aotearoa/New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2010

Jennifer Curtin  and
Katherine Teghtsoonian
Jennifer Curtin
Affiliation:
University of Auckland, New Zealand
Katherine Teghtsoonian
Affiliation:
University of Victoria, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Ministry of Women's Affairs in Aotearoa/New Zealand was established as a stand-alone agency in 1986. It has remained institutionally intact for more than 20 years, unlike many women's policy agencies that have been downsized or eliminated. It has survived significant economic and state sector restructuring and weathered the extension of neoliberal orientations into the reform of social policy. We analyze New Zealand's version of state feminism during three political periods since its inception. For each period, we identify significant developments both in the broader political context and within the ministry itself, and examine how effective Women's Affairs has been in advancing the substantive interests of diverse groups of women. Our analysis identifies three key features of the Ministry of Women's Affairs—its political context, its political and bureaucratic leadership, and its institutional design—as important in explaining both the ministry's continued existence and the limits on what it has been able to achieve.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 545 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benn, Melissa. 2000. “A Short March Through the Institutions: Reflections on New Labour's Gender Machinery.” In New Gender Agenda: Why Women Still Want More, ed. Coote, Anna. London: Institute for Public Policy Research, 40–46.Google Scholar
Boston, Jonathan. 1999. “New Zealand's Welfare State in Transition.” In Redesigning the Welfare State in New Zealand: Problems, Policies, Prospects, ed. Boston, Jonathan, Dalziel, Paul, and St. John, Susan. Auckland: Oxford University Press, 3–19.Google Scholar
Boston, Jonathan, Martin, John, Pallot, June, and Walsh, Pat. 1996. Public Management: The New Zealand Model. Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bunkle, Phillida. 1995. New Zealand Women 1985–1995: Markets and Inequality: An Assessment of the Impact of Market Policies on the Position of Women. Wellington: P. Bunkle.Google Scholar
Burt, Sandra, and Hardman, Sonya Lynn. 2001. “The Case of Disappearing Targets: The Liberals and Gender Equality.” In How Ottawa Spends 2001–2002: Power in Transition, ed. Pal, Leslie A.. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press, 201–22.Google Scholar
Campbell, Gordon. 1988. “Marketing the Ministry.” NZ Listener, August 6, 32–34.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2002. “The ‘Femocrat’ Strategy: Expanding the Repertoire of Feminist Activists.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2006. “Working From Within: Women in the NSW Bureaucracy.” In “No Fit Place for Women”? Women in New South Wales Politics, ed. Brennan, Deborah and Chappell, Louise. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press, 154–77.Google Scholar
Curtin, Jennifer. 1992. “The Ministry of Women's Affairs: Where Feminism and Public Policy Meet.” Unpublished M.A. thesis. University of Waikato, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Curtin, Jennifer. 1999. “New Zealand Initiatives to Pay Parents: Possibilities for the Antipodes?” Economic and Labour Relations Review 10 (2): 188–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, Jennifer. 2008. “Women, Political Leadership and Substantive Representation: The Case of New Zealand.” Parliamentary Affairs 61 (3): 490–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, Jennifer, and Devere, Heather. 2006. “Global Rankings and Domestic Realities: Women, Work and Policy in Australia and New Zealand.” Australian Journal of Political Science 41 (2): 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, Jennifer, and Sawer, Marian. 1996. “Gender Equity in the Shrinking State: Women and the Great Experiment.” In The Great Experiment: Labour Parties and Public Policy Transformation in Australia and New Zealand, ed. Castles, Francis, Gerritsen, Rolf, and Vowles, Jack. Auckland: Auckland University Press, 149–69.Google Scholar
Department of Internal Affairs. 1996. Responsiveness to Maori Plan. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, Rosemary. 1992. “Stating the Contradictions: The Case of Women's Employment.” In Feminist Voices: Women's Studies Texts for Aotearoa/New Zealand, ed. Du Plessis, Rosemary. Auckland: Oxford University Press, 209–38.Google Scholar
Dyson, Ruth. 2004. “Government Extends Paid Parental Leave.” Press release, August 3. http://www.beehive.govt.nz/ViewDocument.aspx?DocumentID=19102 (Accessed April 30, 2007).Google Scholar
Franzway, Suzanne, Court, Dianne, and Connell, Robert W.. 1989. Staking a Claim: Feminism, Bureaucracy and the State. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Grey, Sandra J. 2008. “Out of Sight, Out of Mind: The New Zealand Women's Movement.” In Women's Movements: Flourishing or in Abeyance? ed. Grey, Sandra and Sawer, Marian. London: Routledge, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, Sandra, and Sawer, Marian, eds. 2008. Women's Movements: Flourishing or in Abeyance? London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankivsky, Olena. 2005. “Gender Mainstreaming vs. Diversity Mainstreaming: A Preliminary Examination of the Role and Transformative Potential of Feminist Theory.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 38 (4): 977–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haussman, Melissa, and Sauer, Birgit, eds. 2007. Gendering the State in the Age of Globalization: Women's Movements and State Feminism in Postindustrial Democracies. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hyman, Prue. 2008. “The Ministry of Women's Affairs after 23 Years—Personal Reflections on Its Existence, Roles and Effectiveness.” Presented to New Zealand Women's Studies Association Conference, Invercargill.Google Scholar
Inland Revenue Department. 1998. A Guide for Consultation with Maori. Wellington: Inland Revenue.Google Scholar
Kahu, Ella, and Morgan, Mandy. 2007. “A Critical Discourse Analysis of New Zealand Government Policy: Women as Mothers and Workers.” Women's Studies International Forum 30: 134–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantola, Johanna, and Outshoorn, Joyce. 2007. “Changing State Feminism.” In Changing State Feminism, ed. Outshoorn, Joyce and Kantola, Johanna. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–19.Google Scholar
Larner, Wendy. 2000. “Post-Welfare State Governance: Towards a Code of Social and Family Responsibility.” Social Politics 7 (2): 244–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, Sarah. 2006. “Ideas from ‘Across the Ditch’? Wedge Politics in the 2005 New Zealand Election.” Australian Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 427–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malloy, Jonathan. 1999. “What Makes a State Advocacy Structure Effective? Conflicts Between Bureaucratic and Social Movement Criteria.” Governance 12 (3): 267–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, Amy G. 2009. “Comparative Gender and Policy Projects in Europe: Current Trends in Theory, Method and Research.” Comparative European Politics, 7 (1): 12–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazur, Amy G., and McBride, Dorothy E.. 2007. “State Feminism since the 1980s: From Loose Notion to Operationalized Concept.” Politics and Gender 3 (December): 501–13.Google Scholar
McDowell, T. 1985. “Tokenism in the Ministry.” Broadsheet 128 (April), 29–30.Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 1990. Briefing to the Incoming Government. Wellington: The Ministry.Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 1996a. Annual Report 1995–96. Wellington: The Ministry.Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 1996b. Briefing to the Incoming Government. Wellington: The Ministry.Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 1996c. The Full Picture: Guidelines for Gender Analysis Te Tirohanga Whanui: Nga aratohu mo nga rereketanga ira tangata. Wellington: The Ministry.Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 1999. Briefing to the Incoming Government. Wellington: The Ministry.Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 2000. Report of the Ministry of Women's Affairs for the Year Ended 30 June 2000. Wellington: The Ministry.Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 2002a. Briefing to the Incoming Government July 2002. Wellington: The Ministry.Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 2002b. Report of the Ministry of Women's Affairs for the Year Ended 30 June 2002. Wellington: The Ministry.Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 2002c. The Status of Women in New Zealand: 2002 CEDAW Report. Wellington: The Ministry.Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 2003. Report of the Ministry of Women's Affairs for the Year Ended 30 June 2003. Wellington: The Ministry.Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 2004. Action Plan for New Zealand Women. Wellington: The Ministry.Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 2005a. Briefing to the Incoming Government. Wellington: The Ministry. http://www.mwa.govt.nz/news-and-pubs/publications/bim.pdf (Accessed April 25, 2007).Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 2005b. Report of the Ministry of Women's Affairs for the Year Ended 30 June 2005. Wellington: The Ministry.Google Scholar
MWA (Ministry of Women's Affairs). 2007. Briefing to the Incoming Minister. Wellington: The Ministry. http://www.mwa.govt.nz/news-and-pubs/publications/bim2007.pdf (Accessed June 15, 2008).Google Scholar
MWWL (Maori Women's Welfare League). 2002. Status of Maori Women: Comments and Recommendations to the UN CEDAW Monitoring Committee on New Zealand's Progress in Implementing the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. http://222.lawyers.org.nz/wcg/articlefiles/cedawsept2002.pdf (Accessed April 29, 2007).Google Scholar
O'Brien, Mike. 2005. “What Kind of New Zealand Do We Want to Build? Towards An Inclusive Social Policy.” Social and Cultural Studies 5 (September), 3–15.Google Scholar
O'Regan, Mary, and Varnham, Mary. 1992. “Daring or Deluded? A Case Study in Feminist Management.” In Feminist Voices: Women's Studies Texts for Aotearoa/New Zealand, ed. Du Plessis, Rosemary. Auckland: Oxford University Press, 197–208.Google Scholar
Ortbals, Candice D. 2008. “Subnational Politics in Spain: New Avenues for Feminist Policy Making and Activism.” Politics and Gender 4 (March): 93–119.Google Scholar
Outshoorn, Joyce, and Kantola, Johanna. 2007. “Assessing Changes in State Feminism over the Last Decade,” In Changing State Feminism, ed. Outshoorn, Joyce and Kantola, Johanna. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 266–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosier, Pat. 1989. “Approaches to Efficiency and Effectiveness in Government Departments.” Broadsheet 169: 9.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 1990. Sisters in Suits: Women and Public Policy in Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 1999. “The Watchers Within: Women and the Australian State.” In Women, Public Policy and the State, ed. Hancock, Linda. South Yarra: MacMillan Education Australia, 36–53.Google Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 2002. “Governing for the Mainstream: Implications for Community Representation.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 61 (1): 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawer, Marian. 2007. “Australia: The Fall of the Femocrat.” In Changing State Feminism, ed. Outshoorn, Joyce and Kantola, Johanna. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 20–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, Judith. 2007a. “The Challenge of Diversity: The Evolution of Women's Policy Agencies in Britain.” Politics and Gender 3 (December): 513–30.Google Scholar
Squires, Judith. 2007b. The New Politics of Gender Equality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, Judith, and Wickham-Jones, Mark. 2002. “Mainstreaming in Westminster and Whitehall: From Labour's Ministry for Women to the Women and Equality Unit.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SSC (State Services Commission). 2003. “Capability Reviews of the Ministry of Youth Affairs and the Ministry of Women's Affairs.” Cabinet Policy Committee, August 6. http://www.ssc.govt.nz/display/document.asp?docid=3342&PageType=content&NavID=82&displaytype=pf (Accessed April 26, 2007).Google Scholar
Stephen, Kylie. 2000. “Catalysts for Change? The Effectiveness of State Agencies in Promoting Equality.” In Making Women Count: Integrating Gender into Law and Policy-making, ed. Beveridge, Fiona, Nott, Sue, and Stephen, Kylie. Aldershot: Dartmouth, 223–45.Google Scholar
“Submission to the Minister of Women's Affairs from a Working Group of Maori Women of Tamaki Makaurau.” Mimeo, August 1984.Google Scholar
Tahi, Brenda. 1995. “Biculturalism: The Model of Te Ohu Whakatupu.” In Justice and Identity: Antipodean Practices, ed. Wilson, Margaret and Yeatman, Anna. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books, 61–77.Google Scholar
Tamihana, S., and Rosier, Pat. 1989. “My Strength Is Not One of the Individual but One of Unity.” Broadsheet 169: 24–26.Google Scholar
Teghtsoonian, Katherine. 2000. “Gendering Policy Analysis in the Government of British Columbia: Strategies, Possibilities and Constraints,” Studies in Political Economy 61 (Spring): 107–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teghtsoonian, Katherine. 2003. “W(h)ither Women's Equality? Neoliberalism, Institutional Change and Public Policy in British Columbia.” Policy, Organisation and Society 22 (1): 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teghtsoonian, Katherine. 2004. “Neoliberalism and Gender Analysis Mainstreaming in Aotearoa/New Zealand,” Australian Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 267–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teghtsoonian, Katherine. 2005. “Disparate Fates in Challenging Times: Women's Policy Agencies and Neoliberalism in Aotearoa/New Zealand and British Columbia.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 38 (2): 307–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teghtsoonian, Katherine, and Chappell, Louise. 2008. “The Rise and Decline of Women's Policy Machinery in British Columbia and New South Wales: A Cautionary Tale.” International Political Science Review 29 (1): 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TPK (Te Puni Kokiri Ministry of Maori Development). 1996. Post Election Brief October 1996. Wellington: TPK.Google Scholar
TPK (Te Puni Kokiri Ministry of Maori Development). 1999. Evaluation for Maori: Guidelines for Government Agencies. Wellington: TPK.Google Scholar
TPK and Ministry of Women's Affairs. 1999. Maori Women in Focus. Wellington: TPK.Google Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Margaret. 1995. “Constitutional Recognition of the Treaty of Waitangi: Myth or Reality?” In Justice and Identity: Antipodean Practices, ed. Wilson, Margaret and Yeatman, Anna. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, Alison. 2008. “Too Late for Gender Mainstreaming? Taking Stock in Brussels.” Journal of European Social Policy 18 (3): 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar