Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:27:07.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Feminist Theory Matters for Feminist Practice: The Case of Rape Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2014

Rose Corrigan
Rose Corrigan*
Affiliation:
Drexel University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Rape crisis centers, which provide supportive services to survivors of sexual assault, are commonly lauded as one of the most successful and lasting transformations achieved by second-wave feminism (Bevacqua 2000; Martin 2005; Schmitt and Martin 2007). But the advocates who work in these centers overwhelmingly reject the use of the word “feminist” to describe themselves or the work of their agencies (Campbell, Baker, and Mazurak 1998; Corrigan 2013; Maier 2008). Here, I describe this puzzling disconnect between feminist consciousness and feminist practice and offer a theory of why the incorporation of feminist analysis could enrich the provision of services on the ground.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , June 2014 , pp. 280 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, Margaret, and Renzetti, Claire. 1980. “Rape Crisis Counseling and the Culture of Individualism.” Contemporary Crises 4 (3): 323–39.Google Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann. 2005. “Inside and Outside the State: Movement Insider Status, Tactics, and Public Policy Achievements.” In Routing the Opposition: Social Movements, Public Policy, and Democracy, ed. Meyer, David S., Jenness, Valerie, and Ingram, Helen. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 149–76.Google Scholar
BenDor, Jan. 1976. “Justice after Rape: Legal Reform in Michigan.” In Sexual Assault, ed. Walker, Marcia J. and Brodsky, Stanley L.. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath, 149–60.Google Scholar
Bevacqua, Maria. 2000. Rape on the Public Agenda: Feminism and the Politics of Sexual Assault. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Rebecca, Baker, Charlene, and Mazurak, Terri. 1998. “Remaining Radical? Organizational Predictors of Rape Crisis Centers' Social Change Initiatives.” American Journal of Community Psychology 26 (3): 457–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Connell, Noreen, and Wilson, Cassandra, eds. 1974. Rape: The First Sourcebook for Women. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Rose. 2013. Up Against a Wall: Rape Reform and the Failure of Success. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gornick, Janet, Burt, Martha R., and Pittman, Karen J.. 1985. “Structure and Activities of Rape Crisis Centers in the Early 1980s.” Crime & Delinquency 31 (2): 247–68.Google Scholar
Maier, Shana. 2008. “Are Rape Crisis Centers Feminist Organizations?” Feminist Criminology 3 (2): 82–100.Google Scholar
Martin, Patricia Yancey. 1990. “Rethinking Feminist Organizations.” Gender and Society 4 (2): 182–206.Google Scholar
Martin, Patricia Yancey. 2005. Rape Work: Victims, Gender, and Emotions in Organization and Community Context. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Frederika, and Martin, Patricia Yancey. 2007. “The History of the Anti-Rape and Rape Crisis Center Movements.” In Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Violence, ed. Renzetti, Claire and Edleson, Jeffrey. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar