Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:08:46.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State Structures and The Politics of Child Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2011

Deborah Brennan  and
Rianne Mahon
Deborah Brennan
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales
Rianne Mahon
Affiliation:
Balsillie School of International Affairs/Wilfred Laurier University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

New and reconfigured structures of policymaking and governance present fresh challenges to gender equality seekers, especially in federal systems. In a world in which policy functions are increasingly being “uploaded” to international or supranational levels, “downloaded” to meso-level units, or “offloaded” to civil society and private enterprises (Banaszak, Beckwith, and Rucht 2003), the links among institutional design, policy activism, and policy outcomes provide fruitful opportunities for empirical research and theory building. This essay asks what impact state architectures have on women's political mobilization around child care. How might we theorize the effects of different types of federation and multilevel governance on child-care activists' political opportunities and achievement of policy outcomes? How adequate are existing frameworks for explaining links among policy actors, state institutions, civil society, and international business? We sketch some preliminary answers and show how recognizing the significance of the multiple scales and layers involved in contemporary governance can expand feminist research agendas and promote gender-sensitive policymaking. Child care is increasingly understood as an essential component of contemporary welfare states (Michel and Mahon 2002). Well-designed child-care programs help time-pressed earner parents reconcile work and family life and make it possible for lone parents to improve their economic situation through paid work. Universal early childhood education and care (ECEC) also lays the foundations for lifelong learning, indispensable for success in knowledge-based, postindustrial economies. Adequate public support for ECEC systems generates good postindustrial jobs for early childhood educators who work in publicly financed, regulated settings instead of in low-paid, informal, caregiving situations (Esping-Andersen 1999). Developing high-quality, universal ECEC in federal systems with divided jurisdictional responsibility, however, faces particular challenges. Most comparative social policy and welfare regime literature ignores state architectures by assuming that unitary state forms are the norm and focusing purely on nation-state governments and policymaking (Esping-Andersen 1999). Advocacy and policy initiatives on international or meso-level scales typically are ignored or underexplored.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 286 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Banaszak, Lee Ann, Beckwith, Karen, and Rucht, Dieter. 2003. “When Power Relocates: Interactive Changes in Women's Movements and States.” In Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State, ed. Banaszak, Lee Ann, Beckwith, Karen, and Rucht, Dieter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–29.Google Scholar
Brennan, Deborah. 2007. “Babies, Birthrates and Budgets.” Social Politics 14 (1): 31–57.Google Scholar
Brennan, Deborah. 2010. “Federalism, Childcare and Multilevel Governance in Australia.” In Federalism, Feminism and Multilevel Governance, ed. Haussman, MelissaSawer, Marian, and Vickers, Jill. Farnham: Ashgate, 37–50.Google Scholar
Brennan, Deborah, Blaxland, Megan, and Tannous, Kathy. 2009. A Strategic Assessment of the Children's Services Industry. Canberra: Commonwealth Disability and Community Services Ministerial Advisory Council.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise. 2002. Gendering Government: Feminist Engagement with the State in Australia and Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, Louise, and Costello, Mayet. 2010. “Australian Federalism and Gender Equality Policy-Making: Obstacle or Opportunity?” Prepared for Feminist International Network on State Architecture Workshop, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1999. Social Foundations of Post-Industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne. 2000. “The Never-Ending Story: The Struggle for Universal Child Care Policy in the 1970s.” Canadian Historical Review 81 (4): 582–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, Rianne. 2007. “Challenging National Regimes from Below: Toronto's Child-Care Politics.” Politics & Gender 3 (March): 55–78.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne. 2010. “Learning, Forgetting, Rediscovering: Producing the OECD's ‘New’ Family Policy.” In Mechanisms of OECD Governance: International Incentives for National Policy-Making? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mahon, Rianne, and Collier, Cheryl. 2010. “Navigating the Shoals of Canadian Federalism: Childcare Advocacy.” In Federalism, Feminism and Multilevel Governance, ed. Haussman, Melissa, Sawer, Marian, and Vickers, Jill. Farnham: Ashgate, 51–66.Google Scholar
Michel, Sonya and Mahon, Rianne (2002) Chil Care Policy at a Cross roads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring Routledge (US)Google Scholar
Prentice, Susan. 2004. “Manitoba's Childcare Regime: Social Liberalism in Flux.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 29 (2): 193–207.Google Scholar
Sosinsky, Laura Stout, Lord, Heather, and Zigler, Edward. 2007. “For-Profit/Non-Profit Differences in Center-Based Child Care Quality: Results from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 28 (5): 390–410.Google Scholar
Vickers, Jill. 2010. “A Two-Way Street: Federalism and Women's Politics in Canada and the United States.” Publius 40 (3): 412–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNICEF. 2008. A League Table of Early Childhood Education in Economically Advanced Countries. Florence: UNICEF.Google Scholar