Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:07:16.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

(Re)Producing American Soldiers in an Age of Empire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2009

Isabelle V. Barker
Affiliation:
Bryn Mawr College

Abstract

While there has been little data gathered as to the presence of migrant workers in service occupations on U.S. military bases in Iraq, the data that do exist along with anecdotal evidence gathered by journalists suggest that the division of reproductive labor on military bases reflects an underexplored axis in the global organization of social reproductive labor. Due in part to the privatization of these services, the vast majority of vital support service labor is outsourced to and performed by men migrating from India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, the Philippines, Nepal, and Pakistan. This globalized division of reproductive labor is a site of symbolic politics that reinforces the gendered dimensions of the national identity of the American soldier. This division builds off of a long tradition of gendered dynamics framing military service. The displacement of reproductive labor, which remains coded as effeminate, onto poor migrant men serves to reinforce the aggressive masculine version of American soldiering in a way that smoothes over differences among soldiers along the lines of race, class, rural or urban origin, and even gender. Echoing earlier colonizer–colonized relations, this division of labor in turn supports the increasingly imperial posture that the United States has assumed in the world.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bakker, Isabella. 2007. “Social Reproduction and the Constitution of a Gendered Political EconomyNew Political Economy 12 (4): 541–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briody, Dan. 2004. The Halliburton Agenda: The Politics of Oil and Money. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Brotz, Howard, and Everett, Wilson. 1946. “Characteristics of Military SocietyAmerican Journal of Sociology 51 (5): 371–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, Wendy. 1988. Manhood and Politics: A Feminist Reading of Political Theory. Totowa NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Castles, Stephen, and Miller, Mark J.. [1993] 2003. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Cerjan, Paul. 2005. Interview. Boston: Frontline WGBH. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/warriors/interviews/cerjan.html (Accessed June 21, 2007).Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Barbara, and Arlie Russell, Hochschild, eds. 2002. Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1988. Does Khaki Become You? The Militarization of Women's Lives. London: Pandora.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2004. The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faludi, Susan. 1994. “The Naked CitadelNew Yorker, September 5, 6281.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Niall. 2004. Colossus: The Price of America's Empire. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
GAO (Government Accountability Office). 2005. “Reporting Additional Servicemember Demographics Could Enhance Congressional Oversight” GAO-05-952.Google Scholar
Gates, Robert. 2007. “Media Availability with Secretary Gates Enroute to Chile” Washington DC: Department of Defense. http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid = 4050 (Accessed December 11, 2007).Google Scholar
Gaviria, Marcella, and Martin, Smith. 2005. Private Warriors [video]. Boston: Frontline WGBH.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua S. 2001. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice-Versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herbert, Melissa S. 1998. Camouflage Isn't Only for Combat: Gender, Sexuality, and Women in the Military. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2004. “Illusions of Empire: Defining the New American Order.Foreign Affairs 83 (2): 144–55.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. 2004. The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic. New York: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert, and William, Kristol. 2000. “Introduction: National Interest and Global Responsibility,” in Present Dangers: Crisis and Opportunity in American Foreign and Defense Policy, ed. Robert, Kagan and William, Kristol. San Francisco: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Robert D. 2005. Imperial Grunts: The American Military on the Ground. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Kaufman-Osborn, Timothy. 2005. “Gender Trouble at Abu Ghraib?Politics and Gender 1 (December): 597619.Google Scholar
Keene, Jennifer D. 2001. Doughboys, the Great War, and the Remaking of America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Paul. 1988. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda K. 1980. Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 2003. Feminism Without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Nandy, Ashis. [1983] 1988. The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self under Colonialism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Narayan, Uma. 1997. Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions, and Third World Feminism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norton, Anne. 2004. Leo Strauss and the Politics of American Empire. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
NPP (National Priorities Project). 2006. “Military Recruiting 2006.” http://www.nationalpriorities.org/Publications/Military-Recruiting-2006.html (Accessed December 11, 2007).Google Scholar
NSS (“National Security Strategy of the United States”). 2002. Washington DC: The White House.Google Scholar
Pan, Esther. 2004. “Iraq-Military Outsourcing.” Council on Foreign Relations. May 20. http://www.cfr.org/publication/7667/#6 (Accessed December 11, 2007).Google Scholar
Peterson, V. Spike. 2003. A Critical Rewriting of Global Political Economy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pieterse, Jan Nederveen. 2004. Globalization or Empire? New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PNAC (Project for the New American Century). 1997. “Statement of Principles.” http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm (Accessed April 14, 2009).Google Scholar
Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Scranton, Deborah. 2008. Bad Voodoo's War [video]. Boston: Frontline WGBH.Google Scholar
Seccombe, Ian. 1985. “International Labor Migration in the Middle East: A Review of Literature and Research, 1974–1984.International Migration Review 19 (2): 335–52.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter W. 2003. Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, R. Claire. 1999. Citizen-Soldiers and Manly Warriors: Military Service and Gender in the Civic Republican Tradition. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Snyder, R. Claire. 2003. “The Citizen-Soldier Tradition and Gender Integration of the U.S. MilitaryArmed Forces & Society 29 (2): 185204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura. 2002. Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tétreault, Mary Ann. 2006. “The Sexual Politics of Abu Ghraib: Hegemony, Spectacle, and the Global War on Terror.National Women's Studies Association Journal 18 (3): 3350.Google Scholar
Tickner, Ann J. 1996. “Identity in International Relations Theory.” In The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory, ed. Yosef, Lapid and Friedrich, Kratochwil. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Woods, Steven. 2004. “The Logistics Civil Augmentation Program: What Is the Status Today?” Carlisle, PA: U.S. Army War College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar