Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:04:18.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Never Surrender? How Women's Groups Abandoned Their Policy Niche in U.S. Foreign Policy Debates, 1916–2000

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2009

Kristin A. Goss
Kristin A. Goss
Affiliation:
Duke University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

From World War I through the 1960s, U.S. women's organizations regularly trekked to Capitol Hill to influence congressional foreign policy debates. Yet by the 1990s, these groups had largely disengaged from international affairs. Why? Using an original data set of women's group appearances before Congress from 1916 to 2000, this study documents and explains this puzzling development by exploring the mutually reinforcing linkages among women's identity, claims to issue ownership, and interest group evolution. In the case at hand, the advent of citizen and economic groups competing with women's organizations for ownership of foreign policy questions, coupled with the declining legitimacy of gender “difference” arguments and the resurgence of “sameness” arguments, led women's groups to focus on the dimensions of foreign policy affecting women's rights and status, in particular, and to abandon less explicitly gendered foreign policy issues almost entirely. As multipurpose women's associations declined in vitality, and feminist groups fueled by newly available philanthropic dollars staked claim to women's rights-and-status questions, organized womanhood surrendered much of the foreign-policy issue space over which women had long claimed political authority, and women's groups' presence on Capitol Hill waned.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 453 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baumgartner, Frank R., and Jones, Bryan D.. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1977. Lobbying for the People: The Political Behavior of Public Interest Groups. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1997. The Interest Group Society. 3d ed.New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1999. The New Liberalism: The Rising Power of Citizen Groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Browne, William P. 1988. Private Interests, Public Policy and American Agriculture. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Browne, William P. 1990. “Organized Interests and Their Issue Niches: A Search for Pluralism in a Policy Domain.” Journal of Politics 52 (2): 477–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, Lisa D. 1996. “Love, Toil, and Trouble: Motherhood and Feminist Politics.” Signs 21 (2): 429–54.Google Scholar
Bucy, Carole Stanford. 2002. “Exercising the Franchise, Building the Body Politic: The League of Women Voters and Public Policy, 1945–1964.” Ph.D. diss. Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Lehman Schlozman, Kay, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 2006. “Are Women Legislators Accountable to Women? The Complementary Roles of Feminist Identity and Women's Organizations.” In Gender and Social Capital, ed. O'Neill, Brenda and Gidengil, Elisabeth. New York: Routledge, 357–78.Google Scholar
Cook, Blanche Wiesen. 1992. “Eleanor Roosevelt and Human Rights: The Battle for Peace and Planetary Decency.” In Women and American Foreign Policy: Lobbyists, Critics, and Insiders, 2d ed., ed. Crapol, Edward P.Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 91–118.Google Scholar
Costain, Anne N. 1992. Inviting Women's Rebellion: A Political Process Interpretation of the Women's Movement. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cott, Nancy F. 1987. The Grounding of Modern Feminism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dietz, Mary. 1985. “Citizenship with a Feminist Face: The Problem with Maternal Thinking.” Political Theory 13 (1): 19–37.Google Scholar
DiQuinzio, Patrice. 2005. “Love and Reason in the Public Sphere: Maternalist Civic Engagement and the Dilemma of Difference.” In Women and Children First, ed. Meagher, Sharon M. and DiQuinzio, Patrice. Albany: State University of New York Press, 227–46.Google Scholar
Feldstein, Ruth. 1994. “‘I Wanted the Whole World to See’: Race, Gender, and Constructions of Motherhood in the Death of Emmett Till.” In Not June Cleaver: Women and Gender in Postwar America, 1945–1960, ed. Joanne, Meyerowitz.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Garrison, Dee. 1994. “‘Our Skirts Gave Them Courage’: The Civil Defense Protest Movement in New York City, 1955–1961.” In Not June Cleaver: Women and Gender in Postwar America, 1945–1960, ed. Joanne, Meyerowitz.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Gelb, Joyce, and Palley, Marian Leif. 1996. Women and Public Policies. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Gerson, Deborah A. 1994. “‘Is Family Devotion Now Subversive?’ Familialism Against McCarthyism.” In Not June Cleaver: Women and Gender in Postwar America, 1945–1960, ed. Joanne, Meyerowitz.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Goss, Kristin A. 2006. Disarmed: The Missing Movement for Gun Control in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goss, Kristin A. 2007. “Foundations of Feminism: How Philanthropic Patrons Shaped Feminist Politics.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (5): 1174–91.Google Scholar
Goss, Kristin A. 2009. “Heard on the Hill: The Institutional Origins of Women's Authority.” Duke University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Goss, Kristin A., and Heaney, Michael T.. 2008. “Grassroots Collective Action and the Crises of Women's Identity.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Goss, Kristin A., and Skocpol, Theda. 2006. “Changing Agendas: The Impact of Feminism on Public Policy.” In Gender and Social Capital, ed. O'Neill, Brenda and Gidengil, Elisabeth. Oxford: Routledge, 323–56.Google Scholar
Gray, Virginia, and Lowery, David. 1996. “A Niche Theory of Interest Representation.” Journal of Politics 58 (1): 91–111.Google Scholar
Gusfield, Joseph R. 1981. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Deardorff, Alan V.. 2006. “Lobbying as a Legislative Subsidy.” American Political Science Review 100 (1): 69–84.Google Scholar
Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heaney, Michael T. 2004. “Outside the Issue Niche: The Multidimensionality of Interest Group Identity.” American Politics Research 32 (6): 611–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1978. “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment.” In The New American Political System, ed. Anthony, King.Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 87–124.Google Scholar
Jeffreys-Jones, Rhodri. 1995. Changing Differences: Women and the Shaping of American Foreign Policy, 1917–1994. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Kaminer, Wendy. 1984. Women Volunteering: The Pleasure, Pain, and Politics of Unpaid Work from 1830 to the Present. Garden City, NY: Anchor.Google Scholar
Keiser, Lael. 1997. “The Influence of Women's Political Power on Bureaucratic Output: The Case of Child Support Enforcement.” British Journal of Political Science 27 (1): 111–55.Google Scholar
Kraditor, Aileen. 1971. The Ideas of the Woman Suffrage Movement: 1890–1920. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lindsay, James M. 1994. Congress and the Politics of U.S. Foreign Policy. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lister, Ruth. 2003. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. 2d ed.New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Lowery, David, and Brasher, Holly. 2004. Organized Interests and American Government. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCormick, James M. “Interest Groups and the Media in Post–Cold War U.S. Foreign Policy.” In After the End: Making U.S. Foreign Policy in the Post–Cold War World, ed. Scott, James M.Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 170–98.Google Scholar
McDonagh, Eileen. 2009. The Motherless State: Women's Political Leadership and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Mark H. 1988. “What Sort of Ideas Become Public Ideas?” In The Power of Public Ideas, ed. Reich, Robert B.Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 55–83.Google Scholar
Offen, Karen. 1988. “Defining Feminism: A Comparative Historical Approach.” Signs 14 (1): 119–57.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center for The People & The Press. 1997. “Ten Years of the Pew News Interest Index.”http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=107 (Accessed December 30, 2006).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center for The People & The Press. 2000. “The Public Affairs Gender Gap.”http://people-press.org/commentary/display.php3?AnalysisID=10 (Accessed December 30, 2006).Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Ripley, Randall B., and Lindsay, James M.. 1993. Congress Resurgent: Foreign and Defense Policy on Capitol Hill. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Rochefort, David A., and Cobb, Roger W.. 1994. The Politics of Problem Definition. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Rochon, Thomas R. 1998. Culture Moves: Ideas, Activism, and Changing Values. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarvasy, Wendy. 1992. “Beyond the Difference versus Equality Policy Debate: Postsuffrage Feminism, Citizenship, and the Quest for a Feminist Welfare State.” Signs 17 (2): 329–62.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1990. “Representing Women in Washington: Sisterhood and Pressure Politics.” In Women, Politics, and Change, ed. Gurin, Patricia and Tilly, Louise. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 339–82.Google Scholar
Shaiko, Ronald G. 1996. “Female Participation in Public Interest Nonprofit Governance: Yet Another Glass Ceiling?” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 25 (3): 302–20.Google Scholar
Shaiko, Ronald G. 1997. “Female Participation in Association Governance and Political Representation: Women as Executive Directors, Board Members, Lobbyists, and Political Action Committee Directors.” Nonprofit Management & Leadership 8 (2): 121–39.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Mahajan, Harpeet. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends From the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1): 42–61.Google Scholar
Sharer, Wendy B. 2004. Vote & Voice: Women's Organizations and Political Literacy, 1915–1930. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Tom W. 1984. “The Polls: Gender and Attitudes Toward Violence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 48 (1): 384–96.Google Scholar
Stone, Deborah A. 1989. “Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas.” Political Science Quarterly 104 (2): 281–300.Google Scholar
Stone, Kathryn. 1946. 25 Years of a Great Idea. Washington, DC: National League of Women Voters.Google Scholar
Swerdlow, Amy. 1993. Women Strike for Peace: Traditional Motherhood and Radical Politics in the 1960s. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, John T. 1993. “Interest Group Involvement in Foreign and Defense Policy.” In Congress Resurgent: Foreign and Defense Policy on Capitol Hill, ed. Ripley, Randall B. and Lindsay, James M.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 89–111.Google Scholar
Truman, David B. 1971. The Governmental Process. 2d ed.New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. Senate. Foreign Relations Committee, Subcommittee on the Permanent Court of International Justice. 1924. Permanent Court of International Justice. 68th Cong., 1st sess., April 30 and May 1.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M. 2004. “All Politics Are Global: Interest Groups and the Making of Foreign Policy.” In Diversity and U.S. Foreign Policy: A Reader, ed. Wilson, Ernest J.. New York: Routledge, 126–42.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. Jr. 1991. Mobilizing Interest Groups in America. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan. 1985. “Are Women More Liberal Than Men in the U.S. Congress?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 10 (1): 125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weldon, S. Laurel. 2002. “Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Women in Democratic Policymaking.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1153–74.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1995. Political Organizations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jan Doolittle. 2007. The Women's Joint Congressional Committee and the Politics of Maternalism, 1920–30. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Wright, John R. 1996. Interest Groups and Congress. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Young, Louise M. 1989. In the Public Interest: The League of Women Voters, 1920–1970. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar