No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Navigating to Subsistence: The Gendered Struggles in the Postwar Everyday and Their Implications for Peace
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 July 2020
Extract
In developing a feminist analysis of postwar political economic practices and institutions, my contribution builds on previous Critical Perspectives forums in following Cynthia Enloe's call (2015, 438) to make sense of people's gendered political lives while embracing their “messiness” and Rahel Kunz's (2017) argument for placing life stories at the center of analysis. It focuses on the everyday life of female petty traders involved in the coping economy in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), including those working at the (in)famous Arizona market in Brčko. By taking postwar gendered everyday experiences seriously, my contribution highlights the need for a gender-just, holistic approach to designing postwar reparative justice measures, labor market interventions, and integration of coping economic practices.
- Type
- Online Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Elias, Juanita, and Rai, Shirin. 2015. “The Everyday Gendered Political Economy of Violence.” Politics & Gender 11 (2): 424–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Juanita, and Roberts, Adrienne. 2016. “Feminist Global Political Economies of the Everyday: From Bananas to Bingo.” Globalizations 13 (6): 787–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2015. “Closing Remarks: Militiamen Get Paid; Women Borrowers Get Beaten.” Politics & Gender 11 (2): 435–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, Dina Francesca. 2010. “Lessons from Bosnia's Arizona Market: Harm to Women in a Neoliberalized Postconflict Reconstruction Process.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 158 (6): 1779–2010.Google Scholar
Hronešová, Jessie. 2016. “Might Makes Right: War-Related Payments in Bosnia and Herzegovina.” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 10 (3): 339–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Heidi. 2015. “(Re)framing the Relationship between Discourse and Materiality in Feminist Security Studies and Feminist IPE.” Politics & Gender 11 (2): 413–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jašarević, Larisa. 2007. “Everyday Work: Subsistence Economy, Social Belonging and Moralities of Exchange at a Bosnian (Black) Market.” In The New Bosnian Mosaic: Identities, Memories and Moral Claims in a Post-War Society, eds. Bougarel, Xavier, Helms, Elissa, and Duijzings, Ger. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 273–94.Google Scholar
Kunz, Rahel. 2017. “Beyond the ‘Helpless Nepali Woman’ versus the ‘Fierce Maoist Fighter’: Challenging the Artificial Security/Economy Divide.” Politics & Gender 13 (4): 733–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sardelić, Julija. 2017. “Romani Minorities in War Conflicts and Refugee Crises of the (Post)-Yugoslav Space: A Comparative Socio-Historical Perspective.” Roma Rights: Journal of the European Roma Rights Centre 1 (1): 35–41.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2015. “From Unity to Divergence and Back Again: Security and Economy in Feminist International Relations.” Politics & Gender 11 (2): 435–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stavrevska, Elena. 2018. “The Mother, the Wife, the Entrepreneur? Women's Agency and Microfinance in a Disappearing Post-Conflict Welfare State Context.” Civil Wars 20 (2): 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulumovic, Rasim. 2018. Potentials for Roma Employment in the Enlargement Region. Belgrade: Regional Cooperation Council Roma Integration 2020 Action Team.Google Scholar