Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:15:34.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jane Addams as Feminist Heroine: Democracy and Contentious Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2015

Nancy J. Hirschmann
Nancy J. Hirschmann*
Affiliation:
The University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I have long been a puzzled admirer of Jean Elshtain's work, going back to graduate school when Public Man, Private Woman (Elshtain 1981) first came out, and I read it for a class in feminist theory taught by Nancy Hartsock. I remember another student, a Marxist, wrinkling her nose and saying about the author, “she's really pretty conservative, don't you think?” I had a hard time understanding this question. As a newcomer to feminism in the early 1980s, I perhaps naively thought that anyone who recognized that gender was an important category for political analysis, that it was a realm of inequality, and that canonical political theory actually had a lot to say about it despite the fact that most of our professors always blithely ignored it, was, by definition, pretty radical.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 554 - 561
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1981. Public Man, Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1986. Meditations on Modern Political Thought: Masculine/Feminine Themes from Luther to Arendt. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1991. “In Common Together: Unity, Diversity, and Civic Virtue.” In The Constitution of the People: Reflections on Citizens and Civil Society, ed. Calvert, Robert. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1995. Democracy on Trial. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 2002. Jane Addams and the Dream of American Democracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 2004. “The Perils of Legal Moralism.” Journal of Law and Politics, 20 (4): 549–76.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Moral Psychology and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1992. Rethinking Obligation: A Feminist Method for Political Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2003. The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2008. Gender, Class, and Freedom in Modern Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J., and Liebert, Ulrike. 2001. Women and Welfare: Theory and Practice in the United States and Europe. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Catriona, and Stoljar, Natalie, eds. 2000. Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mink, Gwendolyn. 2002. Welfare's End. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1979. The Problem of Political Obligation: A Critical Analysis of Liberal Theory. New York: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar