Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:13:37.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: (Re)integrating Feminist Security Studies and Global Political Economy: Continuing the Conversation through Empirical Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2020

Maria Martin de Almagro  and
Caitlin Ryan
Maria Martin de Almagro
Affiliation:
Université de Montréal
Caitlin Ryan
Affiliation:
University of Groningen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Attempts to integrate feminist security studies (FSS) and feminist global political economy (GPE) were first meticulously studied in the Critical Perspectives sections of the June 2015 and December 2017 issues of this journal. Although the debate has gained presence in workshops, at international conferences, and even on dedicated websites, the diverse contributions have remained rather theoretical (e.g., Bergeron, Cohn, and Duncanson 2017; Hudson 2015). The aim of these Critical Perspectives essays is to take the integration of FSS and GPE one step further by presenting empirically grounded contributions that help us contextualize the existing theoretical debates. By focusing on postwar contexts, the pieces here take seriously the material conditions of women's empowerment from a perspective attuned to the gendered and racialized logics structuring social orders in postwar states. We believe that these are the spaces where war economies and peace economies meet and where (gendered) structural transformation of societies is possible. Like the two previous collections, we do not understand FSS and GPE as additive (Chisholm and Stachowitsch 2017). Rather, we understand them as traditions that share a common goal, namely, to undermine the racialized neoliberalism and patriarchal capitalism underpinning international intervention and postwar reconstruction projects.

Type
Online Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , e12
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agathangelou, Anna M. 2017. “From the Colonial to Feminist IR: Feminist IR Studies, the Wider FSS/GPE Research Agenda, and the Questions of Value, Valuation, Security, and Violence.” Politics & Gender 13 (4): 739–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergeron, Suzanne, Cohn, Carol, and Duncanson, Claire. 2017. “Rebuilding Bridges: Toward a Feminist Research Agenda for Postwar Reconstruction.” Politics & Gender 13 (4): 715–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, Amanda, and Stachowitsch, Saskia. 2017. “(Re)integrating Feminist Security Studies and Feminist Global Political Economy: Continuing the Conversation.” Politics & Gender 13 (4): 710–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Juanita. 2015. “Introduction: Feminist Security Studies and Feminist Political Economy: Crossing Divides and Rebuilding Bridges.” Politics & Gender 11 (2): 406–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Juanita, and Rai, Shirin. 2015. “The Everyday Gendered Political Economy of Violence.” Politics & Gender 11 (2): 424–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Juanita, and Roberts, Adrienne. 2016. “Feminist Global Political Economies of the Everyday: From Bananas to Bingo.” Globalizations 13 (6): 787–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 1996. “Margins, Silences and Bottom Rungs: How to Overcome the Underestimation of Power in the Study of International Relations.” In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, eds. Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken, and Zalewski, Marysia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 186–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2014. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. San Francisco: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Heidi. 2015. “(Re)framing the Relationship between Discourse and Materiality in Feminist Security Studies and Feminist IPE.” Politics & Gender 11 (2): 413–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin de Almagro, Maria, and Ryan, Caitlin. 2019. “Subverting Economic Empowerment: Towards a Postcolonial-Feminist Framework on Gender (In)Securities in Post-War Settings.” European Journal of International Relations 25 (4): 1059–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordstrom, Carolyn. 2010. “Women, Economy, War.” International Review of the Red Cross 92 (877): 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, Laura J. 2011. “Sex, Security and Superhero(in)es: From 1325 to 1820 and Beyond.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 13 (4): 504–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, Laura J. 2017. Gender, UN Peacebuilding, and the Politics of Space: Locating Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
True, Jacqui. 2012. The Political Economy of Violence against Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar