Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:03:01.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Quotas and Non-Quota Strategies in East Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2015

Netina Tan
Netina Tan*
Affiliation:
McMaster University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In convergence with the global norm toward more proportional representative electoral systems, many countries in East Asia have adopted quota strategies to address women's political underrepresentation (Franceschet, Krook, and Piscopo 2012; Krook 2009). Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, and Japan provide ideal case studies to investigate the impact of these efforts. While these countries share similar economic development, educational levels, and Confucian communitarian ethos, their experiences and progress on empowering women vary. For example, the level of women's legislative representation in the region ranges from a low of 8.1% in Japan to a high of 33.6% in Taiwan. And while Taiwan and South Korea embarked on constitutional reforms in the 1990s and introduced candidate quotas or reserved seats to guarantee women's legislative representation at all levels, Singapore and Japan have resisted legislating quotas but instead set 30% women parliamentarians as targets of party strategies. This collection of papers explores this intraregional variation with a comparative view on the origins and impact of quotas on women's political life. Specifically, we trace the origins of quota adoption and how they interact with the existing electoral and party institutions to improve women's legislative numbers.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 2015 , pp. 171 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ayaz, Ayaz, and Fleschenberg, Andrea, eds. 2009. The Gender Face of Asian Politics, 1st edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Should Feminists Give up on Critical Mass? A Contingent Yes.” Polititcs & Gender 2 (4): 522–30.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2006a. “The Story of the Theory of Critical Mass.” Politics & Gender 2 (4): 511–22.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude. 2006b. Women, Quotas and Politics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, and Freidenvall, Lenita. 2005. “Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Representation of Women: Why Scandinavia Is No Longer the Model.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 104–23.Google Scholar
Derichs, Claudia, and Thompson, Mark R.. 2013. Dynasties and Female Political Leaders in Asia: Gender, Power and Pedigree. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M., eds. 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, Meryl, and Mackay, Fiona. 2013. “When Is Contagion Not Very Contagious? Dynamics of Women's Political Representation in Scotland.” Parliamentary Affairs 67 (4): 866–86.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2004. “Gender Quotas as a Global Phenomenon: Actors and Strategies in Quota Adoption.” European Political Science 3 (3): 59–65.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and Norris, Pippa. 2014. “Beyond Quotas: Strategies to Promote Gender Equality in Elected Office.” Political Studies 62 (1): 2–20.Google Scholar
Matland, Richard E., and Studlar, Donley T.. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway.” The Journal of Politics 58 (3): 707–33.Google Scholar
Thompson, Mark R. 2002. “Female Leadership of Democratic Transitions in Asia.” Pacific Affairs 75 (4): 535–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar