Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:11:19.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Quotas and Comparative Politics: Past, Present, and Future Research Agendas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2013

Mona Lena Krook  and
Andrea Messing-Mathie
Mona Lena Krook
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Andrea Messing-Mathie
Affiliation:
DePaul University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The use of electoral gender quotas—both nationally-mandated and party-based—has generated a large and growing body of research examining these policies. The rapid development of this literature stems from the widespread nature of this phenomenon, with quotas being adopted in more than half of all countries worldwide—nearly all within the last 20 years. The “first generation” of quota research focused primarily on mapping the contours of these measures, theorizing elements of quota design, paths to quota adoption, and reasons for variations in quota effects on the numbers of women elected. While such studies continue to remain important, scholars increasingly recognize that quotas are not simply about increasing the number of women in politics. This has led to the emergence of a “second generation” of quota research, examining their impact on legislative diversity, policy-making behavior, public opinion, and mass mobilization. In contrast, non-gender scholars have generally been slow to respond to these developments, despite the potential for quotas to shape a variety of political dynamics—and thus to illuminate trends in relation to many key debates in comparative politics.

Type
Critical Perspectives on Gender and Politics
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 299 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, Gretchen, and Britton, Hannah, eds. 2006. Women in African Parliaments. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Beaman, Lori, Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini, and Topalova, Petia. 2009. “Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (4): 1497–540.Google Scholar
Bhavnani, Rikhil R. 2009. “Do Electoral Quotas Work After They Are Withdrawn?” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 23–35.Google Scholar
Bjarnegård, Elin, and Zetterberg, Pär. 2011. “Removing Quotas, Maintaining Representation: Overcoming Gender Inequalities in Political Party Recruitment.” Representation 47 (2): 187–99.Google Scholar
Burnet, Jennie E. 2011. “Women Have Found Respect: Gender Quotas, Symbolic Representation, and Female Empowerment in Rwanda.” Politics & Gender 7 (3): 303–34.Google Scholar
Bush, Sarah Sunn. 2011. “International Politics and the Spread of Quotas for Women in Legislatures.” International Organization 65 (1): 103–37.Google Scholar
Caraway, Teri. 2010. “Gendering Comparative Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 169–75.Google Scholar
Celis, Karen, Krook, Mona Lena, Meier, Petra. 2011. “The Rise of Gender Quota Laws: Expanding the Spectrum of Determinants for Electoral Reform.” West European Politics 34 (3): 514–30.Google Scholar
Chen, Li-Ju. 2010. “Do Gender Quotas Influence Women's Representation and Policies?” European Journal of Comparative Economics 7 (1): 13–60.Google Scholar
Childs, Sarah. 2004. New Labour Women MPs. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dahlerup, Drude, ed. 2006. Women, Quotas, and Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Paola, Maria, Scoppa, Vincenzo, and Lombardo, Rosetta. 2010. “Can Gender Quotas Break Down Negative Stereotypes?” Journal of Public Economics 94 (5–6): 344–53.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2008. “Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender 4 (3): 393–425.Google Scholar
Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M., eds. 2012. The Impact of Gender Quotas. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fréchette, Guillaume, Maniquet, François, and Morelli, Massimo. 2008. “Incumbents' Interests and Gender Quotas.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 891–907.Google Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y., and Rahat, Gideon. 2010. Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and their Political Consequences. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kittilson, Miki Caul, and Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A.. 2010. “Engaging Citizens: The Role of Power-Sharing Institutions.” Journal of Politics 72 (4): 990–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena. 2011. “Gendering Comparative Politics.” Politics & Gender 7 (1): 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and True, Jacqui. 2012. “Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms.” European Journal of International Relations 18 (1): 103–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Petra. 2008. “A Gender Gap Not Closed By Quotas: The Renegotiation of the Public Sphere.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 10 (3): 329–47.Google Scholar
Murray, Rainbow. 2010. “Second Among Unequals? A Study of Whether France's ‘Quota Women’ Are Up to the Job.” Politics & Gender 6 (1): 93–118.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Diana Z. 2012. “Quotas and Qualifications in Uganda.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, ed. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 57–71.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles A., and Becker, Howard Saul, eds. 1992. What Is a Case? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2010. “Comparison and Integration: A Path toward a Comparative Politics of Gender.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 177–82.Google Scholar
Tienari, Janne, Holgersson, Charlotte, Meriläinen, Susan, and Höök, Pia. 2009. “Gender, Management and Market Discourse: The Case of Gender Quotas in the Swedish and Finnish Media.” Gender, Work & Organization 16 (4): 501–21.Google Scholar
Towns, Ann E. 2010. Women and States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, Manon, ed. 2008. Women and Legislative Representation. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2006. “Why So Slow? The Challenges of Gendering Comparative Politics.” Politics & Gender 2 (2): 249–63.Google Scholar
Tripp, Aili Mari. 2010. “Toward a Comparative Politics of Gender Research in Which Women Matter.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 191–97.Google Scholar