Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:21:21.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender Differences in Reactions to Fact Checking of Negative Commercials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Kim L. Fridkin ,
Jillian Courey ,
Samantha Hernandez  and
Joshua Spears
Kim L. Fridkin
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Jillian Courey
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Samantha Hernandez
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Joshua Spears
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of most negative campaigns in history may have taken place during the 2014 Senate election cycle. Nearly 75% of senate ads aired during a two-week period in early fall of 2014 showed a candidate in a negative light, according to the Wesleyan Media Project. A postelection analysis by the Center for Public Integrity showed that 46% of the more than one million ads aired during the 2014 senate campaigns were negative. And, in the most competitive states, the proportion of negative ads was even higher (e.g., 67% in North Carolina, 58% in Kansas). Negative advertisements sponsored by candidates, interest groups, and political parties are being launched on the airways, in newspapers, on radio, and via the Internet at an unprecedented pace. These advertisements, however, are now routinely subjected to fact checking. The Washington Post, along with many other fact-checking organizations, such as PolitiFact, The AP Factcheck, and Factcheck.org, examine thousands of statements and political advertisements during campaigns to determine the accuracy of the claims. For instance, during the 2012 election cycle, PolitiFact had 36 reporters and editors working in 11 states producing more than 800 fact checks on the presidential campaign and hundreds more for candidates running for the U.S. House and U.S. Senate.

Type
Thematic Issue: Women, Media, and Politics in a Comparative Perspective
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 369 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, Alan, and Segal, Jeffrey Allan. 1992. Senate Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. M. S., and Bigelow, Brian. 1993. “Latency Period as Affected by News Content.” The Journal of Social Psychology 133 (3): 361–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Iyengar, Shanto. 1997. Going Negative: How Political Advertising Divides and Shrinks the American Electorate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bandura, Albert. 1977. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bennecourt, B. Ann, and Miller, Norman. 1996. “Gender Differences in Aggression as a Function of Provocation: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 119 (3): 420–47.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H. 2013. Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., and Steffen, Valerie J.. 1986. “Gender and Aggressive Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Social Psychological Literature.” Psychological Bulletin 100 (3): 309–330.Google Scholar
Fowler, Erika Franklin, and Ridout, Travis N.. 2010. “Advertising Trends in 2010.” The Forum 8 (4): 1–15.Google Scholar
Fridkin, Kim, and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2004. “Do Negative Messages Work? The Impact of Negativity on Citizens’ Evaluations of Candidates.” American Politics Research 32 (5): 570–605.Google Scholar
Fridkin, Kim, and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2011. “Variability in Citizens’ Reactions to Negative Campaigning.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (2): 307–25.Google Scholar
Fridkin, Kim, and Kenney, Patrick J., and Wintersieck, Amanda. 2015. “Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire: How Fact Checking Influences Reactions to Negative Advertising.” Political Communication 15 (1): 127–151.Google Scholar
Frodi, Ann, Macaulay, Jacqueline, and Thome, Pauline R.. 1977. “Are Women Always Less Aggressive than Men? A Review of the Experimental Literature.” Psychological Bulletin 84 (4): 634–60.Google Scholar
Galician, Mary-Lou. 1986. “Perceptions of Good News and Bad News on Television.” Journalism Quarterly 63 (3): 611–16.Google Scholar
Geer, John G. 2012. “The News Media and the Rise of Negativity in Presidential Campaigns.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (3): 422–27.Google Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S., Lay, J. Celeste, and Stokes, Atiya Kai. 2003. “Women Running ‘As Women’: Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter-Targeting Strategies.” Journal of Politics 65 (1): 244–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, Paul S., and Lucas, Jennifer C.. 2006. “The Fairer Sex? Gender and Negative Campaigning in US Elections.” American Politics Research 34 (1): 69–94.Google Scholar
Hyde, Janet S. 1984. “How Large are Gender Differences in Aggression? A Developmental Meta-Analysis.” Developmental Psychology 20 (4): 722–36.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Norris, Pippa. 2000. “The Developmental Theory of the Gender Gap: Women's and Men's Voting Behavior in Global Perspective.” International Political Science Review 21 (4): 441–63.Google Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Kenney, Patrick J.. 1999. “Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation.” American Political Science Review 93 (4): 877–89.Google Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin, and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2004. No Holds Barred: Negativity in U.S. Senate Campaigns. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Kamhawi, Rasha, and Grabe, Maria Elizabeth. 2008. “Engaging the Female Audience: An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective on Gendered Responses to News Valence Frames.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52 (1): 33–51.Google Scholar
Kern, Montague, and Just, Marion. 1997. “A Gender Gap among Viewers.” In Women, Media, and Politics, ed. Norris, Pippa. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 99–112.Google Scholar
King, James D., and McConnell, Jason B.. 2003. “The Effect of Negative Campaign Advertising on Vote Choice: The Mediating Influence of Gender.” Social Science Quarterly 84 (4): 843–57.Google Scholar
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108 (3): 480–98.Google Scholar
McKinnon, Lori, and Lee Kaid, Lynda. 1999. “Exposing Negative Campaigning or Enhancing Advertising Effects: An Experimental Study of Adwatch Effects on Voters’ Evaluations of Candidates and their Ads.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 27: 217–36.Google Scholar
Min, Young. 2002. “Intertwining of Campaign News and Advertising: The Content and Electoral Effects of Newspaper Ad Watches.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 79 (4): 927–44.Google Scholar
OpenSecrets.org. 2012. “2012 Overview: Most Expensive Races.” Center for Responsive Politics. https://www.opensecrets.org/bigpicture/topraces.php (accessed March 21, 2016).Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, Patrick B., and Geiger, Seth. 1995. “Does the Watchdog Bite? Newspaper Truthboxes and Political Attack Ads.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 72 (4): 771–85.Google Scholar
The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2004. “News Audiences Increasingly Politicized.” http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/215.pdf (accessed February 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center for the People and Press. 2012. “Romney's Personal Image Remains Negative.” http://www.people-press.org/2012/08/02/romneys-personal-image-remains-negative/2/ (acessed March 21, 2016).Google Scholar
Pfau, Michael, and Louden, Allan. 1994. “Effectiveness of Adwatch Formats in Deflecting Political Attack Ads.” Communication Research 21 (3): 325–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soroka, Stuart, and Gidengil, Elisabeth, Fournier, Patrick, and Nir, Lilach. 2014. “Do Women and Men Respond Differently to Negative News?” Presented at first Annual School of Politics and Global Studies Working Conference: Women, Media, and Politics, A Comparative Perspective, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755–69.Google Scholar
Wintersieck, Amanda, and Fridkin, Kim L.. 2016. “The Rise of Fact Checking in American Political Campaigns.” In The Praeger Handbook of Political Campaigning in the United States, ed. Benoit, William. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
Wood, Wendy, and Eagly, Alice H.. 2002. “A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Behavior of Women and Men: Implications for the Origins of Sex Differences.” Psychological Bulletin 128 (5): 699–727.Google Scholar
Zald, David H. 2003. “The Human Amygdala and the Emotional Evaluation of Sensory Stimuli.” Brain Research Reviews 41 (1): 88–123.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Fridkin supplementary material

Appendix A-C

Download Fridkin supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 58.8 KB