Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T18:10:01.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ending Violence against Women in Latin America: Feminist Norm Setting in a Multilevel Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2016

Conny Roggeband
Conny Roggeband*
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Latin American feminists brought up the issue of violence in the 1970s under military rule or situations of armed conflict. These contexts made feminists specifically concerned with state violence against women. Women's organizations pointed to torture and rape of political prisoners and the use of rape as a weapon of war and connected these forms of violence to deeper societal patterns of subordination and violence against women in both the private and public spheres. Processes of democratization in the region brought new opportunities to institutionalize norms to end violence against women (VAW), and in many countries feminists managed to get the issue on the political agenda. In the mid 1990s, the region pioneered international legislation on VAW that uniquely included state-sponsored violence. The Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and Eradication of Violence against Women (1994) established an international obligation for states to prevent, investigate, and punish VAW regardless of whether it takes place in the home, the community, or in the public sphere. While Latin American governments massively ratified this convention, national legislation was not brought in line with the broad scope of the international convention. This points to the complex and often contradictory dynamics of institutionalizing norms to oppose VAW in multilevel settings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 143 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adelman, Miriam, and de Azevedo, Mariana Corrêa. 2012. “Families, Gender Relations and Social Change in Brazil: Practices, Discourse, Policy.” Journal of Child and Family Studies 21 (1): 65–74.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia E. 1990. Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women's Movements in Transition Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia E. 1994. “The (Trans)Formation of Feminism(s) and Gender in Democratizing Brazil.” In The Womens's Movement in Latin America. Participation and Democracy, ed. Jacquette, Jane. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Bandeira, Lourdes. 2009. “Três décadas de resistência feminista contra o sexismo e a violencia feminina no Brasil: 1976 a 2006.” Sociedade e Estado 24 (2): 401–38.Google Scholar
Bucher, Bernd. 2014. “Acting Abstractions: Metaphors, Narrative Structures, and the Eclipse of Agency.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (3): 742–65.Google Scholar
CIM. 2002. Follow-Up to the Convention of Belém do Pará—Results of the Subregional Meetings of Experts—Strategies to Be Followed. XXXI Assembly of Delegates, Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. OAS/Ser.L/II.2.31, CIM/doc.7/02.Google Scholar
Chiarotti, Susana. 2006. “Utilizar la ley como herramienta de cambio. El CLADEM, Red regional de feministas que trabajan con el derecho.” In De lo privado a lo público: 30 años de lucha ciudadana de las mujeres en América Latina, ed. Lebon, N. and Maier, E.. Mexico: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Corbo, Daniel. 2007. “La transición de la dictadura a la democracia en el Uruguay. Perspectiva comparada sobre los modelos de salida política en el Cono Sur de América Latina.” Humanidades 7 (1): 23–47.Google Scholar
Ewing, Anthony P. 1994. “Establishing State Responsibility for Private Acts of Violence against Women under the American Convention on Human Rights.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 26 (1994): 751.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Katherine. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.Google Scholar
Friedman, Elisabeth J. 2009. “Re(gion)alizing Women's Human Rights in Latin America.” Politics & Gender 5 (3): 349–75.Google Scholar
Givan, Rebecca Kolins, Roberts, Kenneth M., and Soule, Sarah A., eds. 2010. The Diffusion of Social Movements: Actors, Mechanisms, and Political Effects. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerrero, Elizabeth. 2002. “Violencia contra las mujeres en América Latina y el Caribe Español—Los desafíos pendientes en la región.” http://agendadelasmujeres.com.ar/notadesplegada.php?id=3257 (accessed October 15, 2012).Google Scholar
Hawkins, Darren, and Humes, Melissa. 2002. “Human Rights and Domestic Violence.” Political Science Quarterly 117 (2): 231–57.Google Scholar
Jaquette, Jacqueline, ed. 1994. The Women's Movement in Latin America: Participation and Democracy. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Niki. 2002. “In Pursuit of the Right to be Free from Violence. The Women's Movement and State Accountability in Uruguay.” In Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Craske, N. and Molyneux, M.. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 102–120.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krook, Mona Lena, and True, Jacqui. 2012. “Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality.” European Journal of International Relations 18 (1): 103–27.Google Scholar
Larraín, Soledad. 1999. “Curbing Domestic Violence: Two Decades of Action. In Too Close to Home: Domestic Violence in the Americas, ed. Morrison, A. R. and Biehl, M. Loreto. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank/Johns Hopkins University Press, 105–29.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Fiona. 2005. “Judicialising and (de)Criminalizing Domestic Violence in Latin America.” Social Policy and Society 5 (1): 103–14.Google Scholar
Follow-Up Mechanism to the Belém do Pará Convention (MESECVI). 2012. Second Hemispheric Report on the Implementation of the Belém do Pará Convention. OEA Official documents. https://www.oas.org/es/mesecvi/docs/MESECVI-SegundoInformeHemisferico-EN.pdf (accessed February 11, 2016).Google Scholar
Meyer, Mary K. 1999 “Negotiating International Norms: The Inter-American Commission of Women and the Convention on Violence against Women.” In Gender Politics in Global Governance, ed. Meyer, M. K. and Prügl, E.. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 58–71.Google Scholar
Montoya, Celeste. 2013. From Global to Grassroots. The European Union, Transnational Advocacy, and Combating Violence against Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Sara. 1996. “Constructing and Negotiating Gender in Women's Police Stations in Brazil.” Latin American Perspectives 23 (1): 131–48.Google Scholar
Pitanguy, Jacqueline. 2002. “Bridging the Local and the Global: Feminism in Brazil and the International Human Rights Agenda.” Social Research 69 (3): 805–20.Google Scholar
Poole, Linda. 2013. “Génesis de la Convención de Belém do Pará: educar y promover el rechazo a la violencia. Suplemento Todas (Suplemento Especial octubre 28, 2013). Instituto Nacional de Mujeres de México (Inmujeres). http://www.oas.org/es/CIM/docs/Poole_Todas.pdf (accessed February 8, 2016).Google Scholar
Red Uruguaya contra la Violencia Domestica y Sexual. 2005. violencia doméstica e incidencia en políticas públicas. http://www.violenciadomestica.org.uy/publicaciones/Violencia%20domestica%20e%20incidencia%20en%20politicas%20publicas.pdf (accessed January 21, 2016).Google Scholar
Repetto, Lady E. 1992. “Women against Violence against Women.” In Compañeras: Voices from the Latin American Women's Movement, ed. G. Küppers. London: Latin America Bureau.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Katherine, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roure, Jodie G. 2009. “Domestic Violence in Brazil: Examining Obstacles and Approaches to Promote Legislative Reform.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 41 (1): 67–98.Google Scholar
Santos, Cecília MacDowell. 2004. “En-gendering the Police: Women's Police Stations and Feminism in São Paulo.” Latin American Research Review 39 (3): 29–55.Google Scholar
Shadow report of civil society to the sixth national report of Brazil on the Convention for the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), 2001–2005 period. 2007. http://www.iwraw-ap.org/resources/pdf/BRAZIL_SHADOWREPORT_CEDAW_June,18%5B1%5D.pdf (retrieved May 1, 2014).Google Scholar
True, Jacqui, and Mintrom, Michael. 2001. “Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming.” International Studies Quarterly 45 (1): 27–57.Google Scholar
Waylen, Georgina. 2006. “Constitutional Engineering: What Opportunities for the Enhancement of Gender Rights?” Third World Quarterly 27 (7): 1209–21.Google Scholar
Zwingel, Susanne. 2012. “How Do Norms Travel? Theorizing International Women's Rights in Transnational Perspective.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (1): 115–29.Google Scholar