Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:25:26.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Mass Media in Elections: What Can We Learn from 1988?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2015

Holli A. Semetko
Holli A. Semetko*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essays on the 1988 Elections
Information
The Political Science Teacher , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , Summer 1988 , pp. 16 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

*Arterton, F. Christopher. 1984. The Media Politics of Presidential Campaigns. In Barber, James David, ed., Race for the Presidency. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 25–54.Google Scholar
*Bartels, Larry M. 1987. Candidate Choice and the Dynamics of the Presidential Nominating Process, American Journal of Political Science 31 (February): 1–30.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1985. Expectations and Preferences in Presidential Nominating Campaigns, American Political Science Review 79 (September): 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Brady, Henry E. and Johnston, Richard. 1987. What's the Primary Message: Horse Race or Issue Journalism? In Orren, Gary R. and Polsby, Nelson W., eds., Media and Momentum, pp. 127–186.Google Scholar
*Clarke, Peter and Evans, Susan H.. 1980. ‘All in a Day's Work’: Reporters Covering Congressional Campaigns, Journal of Communication 30 (4, Autumn): 112–120.Google Scholar
Cook, Rhodes. 1987. Race for the Presidency: Winning the 1988 Nomination. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, Edie N. and Kahn, Kim Freidkin. 1988. Gender Evaluations of U.S. Senate Candidates: An Investigation of Media Influence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
*Goldenberg, Edie N. and Traugott, Michael W.. 1984. Campaigning for Congress. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, Edie N., Traugott, Michael W. and Kahn, Kim Freidkin. 1988. Voter Assessments of Candidates in National and State General Elections. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Graber, Doris A. 1980. Problems in Measuring Audience Effects of the 1976 Debates. In Bishop, George F., Meadow, Robert G., and Jackson-Beeck, Marilyn, eds., The Presidential Debates. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
*Grassmuck, George, ed. 1985. Before the Nomination: Our Primary Problems. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Jeff. 1982. The Real Campaign. New York: Summit Books.Google Scholar
Gurevitch, Michael, Blumler, Jay G. and Weaver, David H.. 1986. The Formation of Campaign Agendas in the U.S. and Britain: A Conceptual Introduction. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Jackson, John E. 1983. Election Night Reporting and Voter Turnout, American Journal of Political Science 27 (4, November): 615–635.Google Scholar
*Joslyn, Richard. 1985. Mass Media and Elections. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
*Leubsdorf, Carl P. 1976. The Reporter and the Presidential Candidate, The Annals 427 (September): 1–11.Google Scholar
*Matthews, Donald R. 1978. Winnowing. In Barber, James David, ed., Race for the Presidency. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, p. 55–79.Google Scholar
*McLeod, Jack M., Becker, Lee B. and Byrnes, James E.. 1974. Another Look at the Agenda-Setting Function of the Press, Communication Research 1: 134–165.Google Scholar
*Miller, Arthur H., Goldenberg, Edie, and Erbring, Lutz. 1979. Type Set Politics: The Impact of Newspapers on Public Confidence, American Political Science Review 73: 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Nimmo, Dan. 1986. Handicapping in the Early Campaign: Frontrunners, Dark Horses, and Also Rans in the Polls, Political Communication Review 11: 19–32.Google Scholar
*Patterson, Thomas E. 1980. The Mass Media Election: How Americans Choose Their President. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E. and McClure, Robert D.. 1976. The Unseeing Eye. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
*Robinson, Michael J. 1976. Public Affairs Television and the Growth of Political Malaise: The Case of ‘The Selling of the Pentagon,’ American Political Science Review 70: 409–32.Google Scholar
*Robinson, Michael J. and Sheehan, Margaret A.. 1983. Over the Wire and on TV: CBS and UPI in Campaign '80. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
*Savage, Robert L. 1986. Statesmanship, Surfacing and Sometimes Stumbling: Constructing Candidate Images During the Early Campaign, Political Communication Review 11: 43–58.Google Scholar
Sears, David O. and Chaffee, Steven H.. 1980. Uses and Effects of the 1976 Debates: An Overview of Empirical Studies. In Kraus, Sidney, ed., The Great Debates, 1976: ford vs. Carter. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Semetko, Holli A. and Barkin, Steve. 1986. Television and Election Agenda-Setting: Comparative Content Analysis of Campaign News in Britain and the U.S. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Shaw, Donald and McCombs, Maxwell E.. 1977. The Emergence of American Political Issues: The Agenda-Setting Function of the Press. St. Paul, MN: West.Google Scholar
Sudman, Seymour. 1986. Do Exit Polls Influence Voting Behavior? Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (3): 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Traugott, Michael W. 1985. The Media and the Nominating Process. In Grassmuck, George, ed., Before the Nomination: Our Primary Problems. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, pp. 101–115.Google Scholar
Trent, Judith S. 1986. They Keep Running and the Rules Keep Changing: An Overview of the Early Campaign from 1972 to 1988, Political Communication Review 11:7–18.Google Scholar
*Vermeer, Jan Pons, ed. 1987. Campaigns in the News: Mass Media and Congressional Elections. Westport, CT; Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D. 1985. The Closeness-Turnout Hypothesis: A Reconsideration, American Politics Quarterly 13 (3): 273–296.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Donna Pritchard. In progress. Super Tuesday and the ‘Primary’ Education of the Electorate: Political Learning and the News Media. Dept. of Political Science, University of Michigan, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Weaver, David H., Wilhoit, G. Cleveland and Semetko, Holli A.. 1986. Press and Election Agendas: A Comparative Study of Britain and the U.S. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
*Weaver, David H., Graber, Doris A., McCombs, Maxwell E. and Eyal, Chaim H.. 1981. Media Agenda-Setting in a Presidential Election. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar