Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T14:19:00.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Veto Override Requirements and Executive Success*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2016

Robert J. McGrath ,
Jon C. Rogowski  and
Josh M. Ryan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Presidential systems around the world vary in the proportion of legislators required to override an executive veto. We argue that the nature of the override provision affects executive influence in policymaking; as the proportion needed to override a veto increases, so should executive influence. We leverage varying override requirements across the US states to conduct a comparative study of executive influence over budgetary outcomes. Using governors’ budget requests and enacted appropriations for fiscal years 1987–2011, we provide evidence that state legislatures better accommodate budgetary requests in states with higher override requirements. Further, governors whose preferences are extreme relative to the legislature are more likely to have their budgetary goals met in states with a higher veto threshold.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 153 - 179
Copyright
© The European Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Robert J. McGrath, Assistant Professor, School of Policy, Government, and International Affairs, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MSN3F4, Fairfax, VA 22030 ([email protected]). Jon C. Rogowski, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1063, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130 ([email protected]). Josh M. Ryan, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Utah State University, 0725 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322 ([email protected]). The authors are grateful for financial support provided by the Center on the American Governor at the Eagleton Institute of Politics at Rutgers University. Peter Balint, Kyle Dropp, Will Howell, Jeff Jenkins, George Krause, Susan Miller, Justin Phillips, Paul Posner, David Redlawsk, Andrew Reeves, Guillermo Rosas, Brandon Rottinghaus, Jose Villalobos, the editors, and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful comments and suggestions. The authors thank Matthew Snyder for research assistance on this project. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.80

References

Abney, Glenn, and Lauth, Thomas P.. 1985. ‘The Line-Item Veto in the States: An Instrument for Fiscal Restraint or an Instrument for Partisanship?’. Public Administration Review 45(3):372–377.Google Scholar
Abney, Glenn, and Lauth, Thomas P.. 1998. ‘The End of Executive Dominance in State Appropriations’. Public Administration Review 58(5):388–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, E. Scott, and Wilkerson, John. 2012. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo, and Schwartz, Thomas. 2006. ‘Presidential Vetoes in Latin American Constitutions’. Journal of Theoretical Politics 18(1):98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Hausmann, Ricardo, Hommes, Rudolf, and Stein, Ernesto. 1999. ‘Budget Institutions and Fiscal Performance in Latin America’. Journal of Development Economics 59(2):253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James E., and Lowry, Robert C.. 1994. ‘Divided Government, Fiscal Institutions, and Budget Deficits: Evidence from the States’. American Political Science Review 88:811–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jorn-Steffen. 2009. Most Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricists Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baldez, Lisa, and Carey, John M.. 1999. ‘Presidential Agenda Control and Spending Policy: Lessons from General Pinochet’s Constitution’. American Journal of Political Science 43:29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Christopher R., Burden, Barry, and Howell, William G.. 2010. ‘The President and the Distribution of Federal Spending’. American Political Science Review 104:783–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy, and Case, Anne. 2003. ‘Political Institutions and Policy Choices: Evidence from the United States’. Journal of Economic Literature 41:7–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyle, Thad. 1968. ‘The Governor’s Formal Powers: A View from the Governor’s Chair’. Public Administration Review 28:540–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhead, Nathaniel, Hall, Matthew E.K., Harden, Jeffrey J., and Windett, Jason H.. 2014. ‘Understanding Executive Vetoes in the American States’. Prepared for presentation at the State Politics and Policy Conference, Bloomington, IN, May 15–17, 2014.Google Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1948. ‘On the Rationale of Group Decision-Making’. Journal of Political Economy 56:23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles M. 2000. Veto Bargaining. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles M. 2009. ‘The Presidential Veto’. In George C. Edwards III and William G. Howell (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency, pp. 362–382, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Howell, William G., and Lewis, David E.. 2008. ‘Toward a Broader Understanding of Presidential Power: A Reevaluation of the Two Presidencies Thesis’. Journal of Politics 70(1):1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, John R., and Schap, David. 1990. ‘Line-Item Veto: Where is Thy Sting?’ The Journal of Economic Perspectives 4(2):103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, Gary W. 1983. ‘When Congress and the President Collide: Why Presidents Veto Legislation’. The Journal of Politics 45(3):696–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W, and Morgenstern, Scott. 2001. ‘Latin America’s Reactive Assemblies and Proactive Presidents’. Comparative Politics 33(2):171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearden, James A., and Husted, Thomas A.. 1993. ‘Do Governors Get What They Want? An Alternative Examination of the Line-Item Veto’. Public Choice 77(4):707–723.Google Scholar
Dometrius, Nelson. 1979. ‘Measuring Gubernatorial Power’. The Journal of Politics 41(2):589–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, George C. 1976. ‘Presidential Influence in the House: Presidential Prestige as a Source of Presidential Power’. American Political Science Review 70:101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1966. The Power of the Purse: Appropriations Politics in Congress. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Margaret Robertson. 2003. ‘Chief Executive Success in the Legislative Arena’. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 3(2):158–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsythe, Dall, and Boyd, Donald J.. 2012. Memos to the Governor, Third Edition: An Introduction to State Budgeting. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Garman, Christopher, Haggard, Stephan, and Willis, Eliza. 2001. ‘Fiscal Decentralization: A Political Theory with Latin American Cases’. World Politics 53(2):205–236.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim, and McCarty, Nolan. 2001. ‘The Politics of Blame: Bargaining Before an Audience’. American Journal of Political Science 45(1):100–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallerberg, Mark, and Marier, Patrik. 2004. ‘Executive Authority, the Personal Vote, and Budget Discipline in Latin American and Caribbean Countries’. American Journal of Political Science 48(3):571–587.Google Scholar
Holtz-Eakin, Douglas. 1988. ‘The Line Item Veto and Public Sector Budgets: Evidence from the States’. Journal of Public Economics 36:269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, William G., and Jackman, Saul P.. 2013. ‘Interbranch Negotiations Over Policy with Multiple Outcomes’. American Journal of Political Science 57(4):956–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, William G., Jackman, Saul P., and Rogowski, Jon C.. 2013. The Wartime President: Executive Influence and the Nationalizing Politics of Threat. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John, and Shipan, Charles. 2002. Deliberate Discretion: The Institutional Foundations of Bureaucratic Autonomy. New York: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Indridason, Indridi H. 2011. ‘Executive Veto Power and Credit Claiming’. Public Choice 146(3–4):375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1985. ‘Congressional Appropriations and the Electoral Connection’. Journal of Politics 47(1):59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1988. ‘Presidential Influence on Congressional Appropriations Decisions’. American Journal of Political Science 32(3):713–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1993. ‘The Methodology of Presidential Research’. In George C. Edwards III , John H. Kessel and Bert Rockman (eds), Researching the Presidency: Vital Questions, New Approaches, pp. 387–412. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Klarner, Carl. 2003. ‘The Measurement of the Partisan Balance of State Government’. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3(3):309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarner, Carl E., and Karch, Andrew. 2008. ‘Why do Governors Issue Vetoes?’. Political Research Quarterly 61(4):574–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klarner, Carl E., Phillips, Justin H., and Muckler, Matt. 2012. ‘Overcoming Fiscal Gridlock: Institutions and Budget Bargaining’. Journal of Politics 74(4):992–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kousser, Thad. 2005. Term Limits and the Dismantling of State Legislative Professionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kousser, Thad, and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009. ‘Who Blinks First? Legislative Patience and Bargaining with Governors’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 24(1):55–86.Google Scholar
Kousser, Thad, and Phillips, Justin. 2012. The Power of American Governors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krause, George A., and Cook, Ian Palmer. 2015. ‘Partisan Presidential Influence over US Federal Budgetary Outcomes: Evidence from a Stochastic Decomposition of Executive Budget Proposals’. Political Science Research and Methods 3:243–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnikov, Yanna, and Shipan, Charles. 2012. ‘Measuring Gubernatorial Budgetary Power: A New Approach’. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 12(4):438–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David E. 2008. The Politics of Presidential Appointments: Political Control and Bureaucratic Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magar, Eric, and Moraes, Juan Andrés. 2012. ‘Factions with Clout: Presidential Cabinet Coalition and Policy in the Uruguayan Parliament’. Party Politics 18(3):427–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1990. ‘Presidentialism in Latin America’. Latin American Research Review 25:157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1997. ‘Multipartism, Robust Federalism, and Presidentialism in Brazil’. In Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg Shugart (eds), Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. 55–109. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg, (eds). 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John G. 2004. For the Many or the Few: The Initiative Process, Public Policy, and American Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan. 2000. ‘Presidential Pork: Executive Veto Power and Distributive Politics’. American Political Science Review 94(1):117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, Nolan M., and T. Poole, Keith. 1995. ‘Veto Power and Legislation: An Empirical Analysis of Executive and Legislative Bargaining from 1961 to 1986’. Journal of Law Economics, and Organization 11:282–312.Google Scholar
McGrath, Robert J., Rogowski, Jon C., and Ryan, Josh M.. 2015a. The Power of Institutional Design: Governors, Vetoes, and Legislative Outcomes’. In David P. Redlawsk (ed.), The American Governor: Power, Constraint, and Leadership in the State , pp. 31–48. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
McGrath, Robert J., Rogowski, Jon C., and Ryan, Josh M.. 2015b. Gubernatorial Veto Powers and the Size of Legislative Coalitions’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 40:571–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, Lee Kendall. 2000. ‘Measuring Presidential Power’. Comparative Political Studies 33(5):660–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Ronald C. 1987. ‘The Founders and Their Experience with the Executive Veto’. Presidential Studies Quarterly 17(2):413–432.Google Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z. 2009. ‘Term Limits and a Boon to Legislative Scholarship’. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 9(2):204–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Association of State Budget Officers. 1987–2011. Fiscal Survey of the States. Washington, DC: National Association of State Budget Officers.Google Scholar
Neto, Octavio Amorim, and Borsani, Hugo. 2004. ‘Presidents and Cabinets: The Political Determinants of Fiscal Behavior in Latin America’. Studies in Comparative International Development 39(1):3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: Free Press/Macmillan.Google Scholar
New, Michael J. 2010. ‘U.S. State Tax and Expenditure Limitations: A Comparative Analysis’. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 10(1):25–50.Google Scholar
Nice, David C. 1988. ‘The Item Veto and Expenditure Restraint’. The Journal of Politics 50(2):487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, John F. 1980. ‘Managing Garbage Can Hierarchies’. Administrative Science Quarterly 25(4):583–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, John F. 1981. ‘Hierarchy and Ecological Control in Federal Budgetary Decision Making’. American Journal of Sociology 87(1):75–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palanza, Valeria, and Sin, Gisela. 2013. ‘Item Vetoes and Attempts to Override Them in Multiparty Legislatures’. Journal of Politics in Latin America 5(1):37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rivers, Douglas, and Rose, Nancy L.. 1985. ‘Passing the President’s Program: Public Opinion and Presidential Influence in Congress’. American Journal of Political Science 29(2):183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Jon C. 2015. ‘Presidential Incentives, Bureaucratic Control, and Party Building in the Republican Era’. Presidential Studies Quarterly 45:796–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogowski, Jon C. 2016. ‘Presidential Influence in an Era of Congressional Dominance’. American Political Science Review (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W., and Simon, Dennis M.. 1985. ‘Presidential Vetoes and Congressional Response: A Study of Institutional Conflict’. American Journal of Political Science 29:397–427.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Alan. 1990. Governors and Legislatures: Contending Powers. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Saiegh, Sebastian M. 2009. ‘Political Prowess or Lady Luck? Evaluating Chief Executives’ Legislative Success Rates’. The Journal of Politics 71(4):1342–1356.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1965. ‘The Politics of the Executive’. In Herbert Jacob and Kenneth N. Vines (eds), Politics in the American States, pp. 217–232. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Sharkansky, Ira. 1968. ‘Agency Requests, Gubernatorial Support and Budget Success in State Legislatures’. The American Political Science Review 62(4):1220–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shor, Boris, and McCarty, Nolan. 2011. ‘The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures’. American Political Science Review 105(3):530–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew Soberg, and Carey, John M.. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sovey, Allison J., and Green, Donald P.. 2011. ‘Instrumental Variables Estimation in Political Science: A Readers’ Guide’. American Journal of Political Science 55(1):188–200.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1992. ‘Challenger Quality and Voting Behavior in U. S. Senate Elections’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(2):247–263.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1997. ‘Another Look at Legislative Professionalization and Divided Government in the States’. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(3):417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2007. ‘Measuring Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited’. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7:211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Ernesto, Talvi, Ernesto, and Grisanti, Alejandro. 1999. ‘Institutional Arrangements and Fiscal Performance: The Latin American Experience’. In James M. Poterba and Jurgen von Hagen (eds), Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, pp. 103–134. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapenhurst, Rick (ed). 2008. Legislative Oversight and Budgeting: A World Perspective, Washington, D.C.: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.Google Scholar
Thompson, Joel A. 1987. ‘Agency Requests, Gubernatorial Support, and Budget Success in State Legislatures Revisited’. Journal of Politics 49(3):756–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1995. ‘Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism’. British Journal of Political Sciencee 25:289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George, and Alemán, Eduardo. 2005. ‘Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in Latin America’. World Politics 57(3):396–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron B. 1964. The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1966. ‘The Two Presidencies’. Transaction 4:7–14.Google Scholar
Willams, Laron K., and Whitten, Guy D.. 2012. ‘But Wait, There’s More! Maximizing Substantive Inferences from TSCS Models’. The Journal of Politics 74(3):685–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wright, Gerald C., and Schaffner, Brian F.. 2002. ‘The Influence of Party: Evidence from the State Legislatures’. American Political Science Review 96(2):367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

McGrath Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download McGrath Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 145.8 KB