Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:00:40.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technology and protest: the political effects of electronic voting in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2019

Zuheir Desai  and
Alexander Lee
Zuheir Desai
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, Harkness Hall, Rochester, NY14627, USA
Alexander Lee*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, Harkness Hall, Rochester, NY14627, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Electronic voting technology is often proposed as translating voter intent to vote totals better than alternative systems such as paper ballots. We suggest that electronic voting machines (EVMs) can also alter vote choice, and, in particular, the way in which voters register anti-system sentiment. This paper examines the effects of the introduction of EVMs in India, the world's largest democracy, using a difference-in-differences methodology that takes advantage of the technology's gradual introduction. We find that EVMs are associated with dramatic declines in the incidence of invalid votes, and corresponding increases in vote for minor candidates. There is ambiguous evidence for EVMs decreasing turnout, no evidence for increases in rough proxies of voter error or fraud, and no evidence that machines with an auditable paper trail perform differently from other EVMs. The results highlight the interaction between voter technology and voter protest, and the substitutability of different types of protest voting.

Keywords

Comparative politicsdeveloping countriesrepresentation and electoral systems
Type
Original Article
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , April 2021 , pp. 398 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allers, MA and Kooreman, P (2008) More evidence of the effects of voting technology on election outcomes. Public Choice 139, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, RM, Kiewiet, DR and Núñez, L (2018) A taxonomy of protest voting. Annual Review of Political Science 21, 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, S and Stewart, C (2005) Residual votes attributable to technology. Journal of Politics 67, 365–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, PC (2011) Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharmaceutical Statistics 10, 150–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bardi, L (1996) Anti-party sentiment and party system change in Italy. European Journal of Political Research 29, 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bélanger, É (2004) Antipartyism and third-party vote choice a comparison of Canada, Britain, and Australia. Comparative Political Studies 37, 1054–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, D and Moretti, E (2007) Does voting technology affect election outcomes? Touch-screen voting and the 2004 presidential election. The Review of Economics and Statistics 89, 660–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, K (2007) Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, MJ (2018) Protesting via the null ballot: an assessment of the decision to cast an invalid vote in latin america. Political Behavior 40, 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujiwara, T (2015) Voting technology, political responsiveness, and infant health: evidence from Brazil. Econometrica 83, 423–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnson, PS, Hanmer, MJ and Niemi, RG (2012) The impact of ballot type on voter errors. American Journal of Political Science 56, 716–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens, GW and Wooldridge, JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature 47, 5–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, G and Levin, I (2018) A general model of abstention under compulsory voting. Political Science Research and Methods 6, 489–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kollman, K, Hicken, A, Caramani, D and Backer, D (2011) Constituency-level elections archive.Google Scholar
McMillan, A (2012) The election commission of India and the regulation and administration of electoral politics. Election Law Journal 11, 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moral, M (2016) The passive-aggressive voter: the calculus of casting an invalid vote in European democracies. Political Research Quarterly 69, 732–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, TJ and Garand, JC (2007) Determinants of invalid voting in latin America. Electoral Studies 26, 432–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, TJ and Roberts, JT (1995) Compulsory voting, invalid ballots, and abstention in Brazil. Political Research Quarterly 48, 795–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, WH and Ordeshook, PC (1968) A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review 62, 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, H and Sen, S (1973) Electoral participation in the French fifth republic. American Political Science Review 67, 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sridharan, E and Varshney, A (2001) Toward moderate pluralism: political parties in India. In Political Parties and Democracy. JHU Press, pp. 206–237.Google Scholar
Stein, RM, Vonnahme, G, Byrne, M and Wallach, D (2008) Voting technology, election administration, and voter performance. Election Law Journal 7, 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, C (2006) Residual vote in the 2004 election. Election Law Journal 5, 158–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiefbold, RP (1965) The significance of void ballots in west German elections. American Political Science Review 59, 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uggla, F (2008) Incompetence, alienation, or calculation? explaining levels of invalid ballots and extra-parliamentary votes. Comparative Political Studies 41, 1141–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ujhelyi, G, Chatterjee, S and Szabó, A (2018) None of the above.Google Scholar
Vaishnav, M (2017) When crime pays: money and muscle in indian politics.Google Scholar
Wolchok, S, Wustrow, E, Halderman, JA, Prasad, HK, Kankipati, A, Sakhamuri, SK, Yagati, V and Gonggrijp, R (2010) Security analysis of India's electronic voting machines. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. ACM, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Desai and Lee supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Desai and Lee supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 271.7 KB