Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:23:24.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legislative Activity and Private Benefits: A Natural Experiment in New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2019

Massimo Morelli ,
Moritz Osnabrügge  and
Matia Vannoni
Massimo Morelli
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Political Sciences, IGIER, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy, CEPR
Moritz Osnabrügge
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
Matia Vannoni*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Economy, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine the causal effect of legislative activity on private benefits, which have been largely neglected by previous research in legislative studies. By relying on a natural experiment in New Zealand, where randomly selected Members of Parliament (MPs) are given the opportunity to propose legislation, we find evidence for a causal relation between proposing a (successful) bill and the private benefits MPs receive, in terms of gifts and payments for services. We conclude that the allocation of private benefits depends on legislative performance.

Keywords

Natural experimentlegislative politicsprivate benefitsWestminster system
Type
Research Notes
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , July 2020 , pp. 565 - 570
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2019.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowler, S (2010) Private members’ bills in the UK parliament: is there an electoral connection? The Journal of Legislative Studies 16, 476–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bräuninger, T and Debus, M (2009) Legislative agenda-setting in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research 48, 804–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bräuninger, T, Debus, M and Wüst, F (2017) Governments, parliaments and legislative activity. Political Science Research and Methods 5, 529–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buisseret, P and Bernhardt, D (2017) Dynamics of policymaking: stepping back to leap forward, stepping forward to keep back. American Journal of Political Science 61, 820–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, F and Morelli, M (2004) Bad politicians. Journal of Public Economics 88, 759–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, GW and McCubbins, MD (2005) Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, G, Guiso, L, Michelacci, C and Morelli, M (2015) From Weber to Kafka: political activism and the emergence of an inefficient bureaucracy. SSRN.Google Scholar
Horiuchi, Y and John, P (2016) Opportunities in parliament and political careers: a natural experiment in the United Kingdom. SSRN.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Commons (2010) Private members’ bills procedure. Technical report.Google Scholar
House of Commons (2016) Private members’ bills: ballot 2016. Technical report.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, K (1998) Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, PJ, Koop, R, Settle, J and Fowler, JH (2014) A natural experiment in proposal power and electoral success. American Journal of Political Science 58, 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, LW (2004) The government agenda in parliamentary democracies. American Journal of Political Science 48, 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattozzi, A and Merlo, A (2008) Political careers or career politicians? Journal of Public Economics 92, 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Zealand Parliament (2009) Members’ bill ballot. Technical report.Google Scholar
New Zealand Parliament (2016) Parliament brief: the legislative process. Technical report.Google Scholar
New Zealand Parliament (2017) Parliamentary library research paper. Members' bills. Technical report.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, BD and Indridason, IH (2018) Luck of the draw? Private members’ bills and the electoral connection. Political Science Research and Methods 6, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Morelli et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/51RILE
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Morelli et al. supplementary material

Online Appendices

Download Morelli et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 159 KB