Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T16:42:34.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth Paradigms and Congruent Institutions: Estimating Context-Varying Effects of Political Institutions on Economic Performance*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2013

Abstract

Traditional economic growth regressions are not adequate to identify the role of political institutions because they assume a universal growth paradigm exists. Instead, there are distinct paradigms of investment- and innovation-based growth, and the effects of political institutions vary across them. Using a dataset covering 83 countries from 1965–2008, this study employs a mixture models estimation to identify these paradigms. It finds that state authority is critical for countries engaged in investment-based growth, and competitive political participation tempers the pace of capital accumulation but increases productivity growth. Conversely, where innovation-based growth predominates, state authority has little effect and competitive political participation slows the pace of growth. Constraints on rulers do not support investment in either paradigm.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Jonathan K. Hanson is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs at Syracuse University, 100 Eggers Hall, Syracuse, New York, 13244, United States ([email protected]). I would like to thank the following people for their comments on this manuscript in its various stages: Pablo Beramendi, Keith Bybee, Matt Cleary, Margarita Estevez-Abe, Robert Franzese Jr., Allen Hicken, John Jackson, Irfan Nooruddin, Stu Thorson, participants in the Research Writing Seminar at Syracuse University and anonymous reviewers. Many thanks to Rachel Sigman for research assistance. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2013.20

References

Acemoglu, Daron, Aghion, PhilippeZilibotti, Fabrizio. 2006. ‘Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth’. Journal of the European Economic Association 4(1):3774.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, SimonRobinson, James A.. 2001. ‘The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation’. The American Economic Review 91(5):13691401.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, DaronRobinson, James A.. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Aghion, PhilippeHowitt, Peter. 2006. ‘Appropriate Growth Policy: A Unifying Framework’. Journal of the European Economic Association 4(2-3):269314.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Devleeschauwer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, Kurlat, SergioWacziarg, Romain. 2003. ‘Fractionalization’. Journal of Economic Growth 8(2):155194.Google Scholar
Alesina, AlbertoLa Ferrara, Eliana. 2005. ‘Ethnic Diversity and Economic Performance’. Journal of Economic Literature 43(3):762800.Google Scholar
Almeida, HeitorFerreira, Daniel. 2002. ‘Democracy and the Variability of Economic Performance’. Economics and Politics 14(3):225257.Google Scholar
Bardhan, Pranab. 2005. ‘Institutions Matter, but Which Ones?’. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 13(3):499532.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert, Lee, Jong-Wha. 2010. ‘A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the Word, 1950-2010’. Working Paper no. 15902. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert. 2006. ‘The Role of the State in Development’. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, edited by Barry R. Weingast and Donald A. Wittman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Matthew A.Lake, David A.. 2003. ‘The Political Economy of Growth: Democracy and Human Capital’. American Journal of Political Science 47(2):333347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Thorsten, Clarke, George, Groff, Alberto, Keefer, PhilipWalsh, Patrick. 2001. ‘New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions’. World Bank Economic Review 15(1):165176.Google Scholar
Bloom, David E., Canning, DavidSevilla, Jaypee. 2003. ‘Geography and Poverty Traps’. Journal of Economic Growth 8(4):355378.Google Scholar
Bockstette, Valerie, Chanda, AreendamPutterman, Louis. 2002. ‘States and Markets: The Advantage of an Early Start’. Journal of Economic Growth 7:347369.Google Scholar
Bosworth, Barry P.Collins, Susan M.. 2003. ‘The Empirics of Growth: An Update’. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2003(2):113179.Google Scholar
Caselli, Francesco. 2005. ‘Accounting for Cross-Country Income Differences’. In Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1A, edited by Philippe Aghion and Steven N. Durlauf. North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Chibber, Vivek. 2003. Locked in Place: State-Building and Late Industrialization in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, DanielSoto, Marcelo. 2007. ‘Growth and Human Capital: Good Data, Good Results’. Journal of Economic Growth 12(1):5176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W.McCubbins, Matthew D.. 2001. ‘The Institutional Determinants of Economic Policy Outcomes’. In Presidents, Parliaments and Policy, edited by Stephan Haggard and Mathew D. McCubbins, chapter 2. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deb, Partha. 2007. ‘FMM: Stata module to estimate finite mixture models’. Statistical Software Components, Boston College Department of Economics, available at http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456895.html. Accessed on 12 June 2009.Google Scholar
Doucouliagos, HristosUlubaşoğlu, Mehmet Ali. 2008. ‘Democracy and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis’. American Journal of Political Science 52(1):6183.Google Scholar
Durlauf, Steven N.Johnson, Paul A.. 1995. ‘Multiple Regimes and Cross-Country Growth Behavior’. Journal of Applied Econometrics 10(4):365384.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1992. ‘The State as Problem and Solution: Predation, Embedded Autonomy, and Structural Change’. In The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State, edited by Stephan Haggard and Robert R. Kaufman, 139181. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2004. ‘The Imperative of State-Building’. Journal of Democracy 15(2):1731.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander. 1962. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gallup, John L., Mellinger, Andrew D.Sachs, Jeffrey D.. 2001. Geography Datasets. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Henisz, Witold J. 2000. ‘The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth’. Economics & Politics 12(1):131.Google Scholar
Heston, Alan, Summers, Robert, Aten, Bettina. 2009. Penn World Table Version 6.3. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Howell, Llewellyn D. 2011. ‘International Country Risk Guide Methodology’. The PRS Group, Inc.Google Scholar
Jerzmanowski, Michał. 2006. ‘Empirics of Hills, Plateaus, Mountains and Plains: A Markov-Switching Approach to Growth’. Journal of Development Economics 81(2):357385.Google Scholar
Keefer, PhilipStasavage, David. 2003. ‘The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence, and the Credibility of Monetary Policy’. American Political Science Review 97(3):407423.Google Scholar
Khan, Mushtaq H. 2000a. ‘Rent-Seeking as a Process’. In Rents, Rent-Seeking and Economic Development: Theory and Evidence in Asia, edited by Mushtaq H. Khan and Jomo Kwame Sundaram Khan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Khan, Mushtaq H. 2000b. ‘Rents, Efficiency and Growth’. In Rents, Rent-Seeking and Economic Development: Theory and Evidence in Asia, edited by Mushtaq H. Khan and Jomo Kwame Sundaram Khan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, StephenKeefer, Philip. 1995. ‘Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures’. Economics & Politics 7(3):207227.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 2004. State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A.Baum, Matthew A.. 2001. ‘The Invisible Hand of Democracy: Political Control and the Provision of Public Services’. Comparative Political Studies 34(6):587621.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G.Jaggers, Keith. 2009. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2007. Fairfax, VA: Center for Systemic Peace, George Mason University.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Geoffrey J.Peel, David. 2000. Finite Mixture Models. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nooruddin, Irfan. 2011. Coalition Politics and Economic Development: Credibility and the Strength of Weak Governments. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C.Weingast, Barry R.. 1989. ‘Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England’. The Journal of Economic History 49(4):803832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plümper, ThomasTroeger, Vera E.. 2007. ‘Efficient Estimation of Time-Invariant and Rarely Changing Variables in Finite Sample Panel Analyses with Unit Fixed Effects’. Political Analysis 15(2):124139.Google Scholar
Pritchett, Lant. 2003. ‘A Toy Collection, A Socialist Star, and a Democratic Dud?: Growth Theory, Vietnam and the Philippines’. In In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth, edited by Dani Rodrik, chapter 5. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, Alvarez, Michael E., Cheibub, José AntonioLimongi, Fernando. 2000. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Well-Being in the Third-World, 1950-1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, AdamLimongi, Fernando. 1993. ‘Political Regimes and Economic Growth’. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(3):5169.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2007. One Economics, Many Recipies: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Solt, Frederick. 2009. ‘Standardizing the World Income Inequality Database’. Social Science Quarterly 90(2):231242.Google Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2002. ‘Private Investment and Political Institutions’. Economics & Politics 14(1):4163.Google Scholar
Tan, Chih Ming. 2010. ‘No One True Path: Uncovering the Interplay Between Geography, Institutions, and Fractionalization in Economic Development’. Journal of Applied Econometrics 27(7):11001127.Google Scholar
Titterington, D. Michael, Smith, Adrian F.M.Makov, U.E.. 1985. Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distributions. Chichester, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weymouth, Stephen. 2011. ‘Political Institutions and Property Rights: Veto Players and Foreign Exchange Commitments in 127 Countries’. Comparative Political Studies 44(2):211240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Hanson Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Hanson Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 129.4 KB