Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T01:03:36.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Distributive Effects of Corruption*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2014

Mircea Popa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article puts forward an explanation of the resilience of corruption by arguing that this phenomenon offers net gains to a much larger share of the population than just corrupt government officials. Corruption is modeled as a solution to an allocation problem for a generic government good G. The defining features of this solution are the existence of a market for G when it is not supposed to exist, and the fact that, in that market, contracts cannot be enforced by an outside agent and transactions are usually secret. Corruption redistributes welfare toward ‘insiders’ who share some natural connection to the government and to other insiders. Corruption also redistributes welfare toward those who are skilled at imposing negative externalities.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , October 2014 , pp. 273 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*Mircea Popa is Leitner Post-Doctoral Research Associate, MacMillan Center, Yale University, 34 Hillhouse Ave, 06520, New Haven, CT, USA ([email protected]). Many thanks to Torben Iversen and James Robinson for guidance in this project, to two anonymous reviewers for helping improve the manuscript, and to William Clark and seminar participants at the EPSA 2012 Annual Meeting for helpful comments on the article. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2013.29

References

Acemoglu, DaronVerdier, Thierry. 2000. ‘The Choice between Market Failures and Corruption’. American Economic Review 90(1):194–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ades, AlbertoDi Tella, Rafael. 1999. ‘Rents, Competition, and Corruption’. American Economic Review 89(4):982–993.Google Scholar
Adsera, Alicia, Boix, CarlesPayne, Mark. 2003. ‘Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government’. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19(2):445–490.Google Scholar
Aidt, Toke S. 2009. ‘Corruption, Institutions, and Economic Development’. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 25(2):271–291.Google Scholar
Aidt, T.S. 2003. ‘Economic Analysis of Corruption: A Survey’. The Economic Journal 113(491):632–652.Google Scholar
Anechiarico, Frank. 1996. The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity: How Corruption Control Makes Government Ineffective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Banerjee, A., Mullainathan, S., Hanna, R.. 2012. ‘Corruption’. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper w17968, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2035315.Google Scholar
Banerjee, A.V. 1997. ‘A Theory of Misgovernance’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4):1289–1332.Google Scholar
Bardhan, Pranab. 1997. ‘Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues’. Journal of Economic Literature 35(3):1320–1346.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S.Stigler, George J.. 1974. ‘Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of Enforces’. Journal of Legal Studies 3:1–18.Google Scholar
Besley, Timothy. 2007. Principled Agents?: The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J.M., Tollison, R.D.Tullock, G.. 1980. Toward a Theory of the Rent-seeking Society. College Station: Texas A & M University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Erik, Golden, Miriam, Hill, Seth. 2007. ‘Electoral Consequences of Political Corruption’. Presented at the APSA Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, 29 August – 1 September 2007.Google Scholar
Della Porta, DonatellaVannucci, Alberto. 2012. The Hidden Order of Corruption. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Dixit, A. 2003. ‘Trade Expansion and Contract Enforcement’. Journal of Political Economy 111(6):1293–1317.Google Scholar
Doig, AlanRiley, Stephen. 1998. Corruption and Anti-corruption Strategies: Issues and Case Studies from Developing Countries. In Corruption & Integrity Improvement Initiatives in Developing Countries. New York: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
Donchev, Dilyan, Ujhelyi, Gergely. 2013. ‘What Do Corruption Indices Measure?’ Unpublished manuscript, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1124066. Accessed 20 August 2013.Google Scholar
Ellison, G.. 1994. ‘Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma with Anonymous Random Matching’. The Review of Economic Studies 61(3):567–588.Google Scholar
Fjeldstad, Odd-Helge, Isaksen, Jan. 2008. Anti-corruption Reforms: Challenges, Effects and Limits of World Bank Support. Washington, DC: Independent Evaluation Group and World Bank, available at http://www.cmi.no/publications/publication/?3134=anti-corruption-reforms-challenges. Accessed 20 August 2013.Google Scholar
Friedman, J.W. 1971. ‘A Non-cooperative Equilibrium for Supergames’. The Review of Economic Studies 38(1):1–12.Google Scholar
Fudenberg, D.Tirole, J.. 1991. Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Galtung, Fredrik. 1998. ‘Criteria for Sustainable Corruption Control’. The European Journal of Development Research 10(1):105–128.Google Scholar
Ghosh, P.Ray, D.. 1996. ‘Cooperation in Community Interaction without Information Flows’. The Review of Economic Studies 63(3):491–519.Google Scholar
Greif, A. 1993. ‘Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: The Maghribi Traders’ Coalition’. American Economic Review 83(3):525–548.Google Scholar
Johnston, Michael. 2005. Syndromes of Corruption: Wealth, Power, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kandori, M. 1992. ‘Social Norms and Community Enforcement’. The Review of Economic Studies 59(1):63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karklins, Rasma. 2005. The System Made Me Do It: Corruption in Post-communist Societies. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.Google Scholar
Karlan, D., Mobius, M., Rosenblat, T.Szeidl, A.. 2009. ‘Trust and Social Collateral’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(3):1307–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klitgaard, Robert. 1988. Controlling Corruption. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kurer, Oskar. 2001. Why Do Voters Support Corrupt Politicians? In The Political Economy of Corruption, edited by A.K. Jain. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laffont, Jean-JacquesN'Guessan, Tchétché. 1999. ‘Competition and Corruption in an Agency Relationship’. Journal of Development Economics 60(2):271–295.Google Scholar
Langseth, Petter, Stapenhurst, RickPope, Jeremy. 1997. ‘The Role of a National Integrity System in Fighting Corruption’. Commonwealth Law Bulletin 23(1–2):499–528.Google Scholar
Lawson, Letitia. 2009. ‘The Politics of Anti-corruption Reform in Africa’. Journal of Modern African Studies 47(1):73–100.Google Scholar
Mauro, Paolo. 1996. The Effects of Corruption on Growth, Investment, and Government Expenditure. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Meagher, Patrick. 2005. ‘Anti-corruption Agencies: Rhetoric versus Reality’. The Journal of Policy Reform 8(1):69–103.Google Scholar
Milgrom, P.R.North, D.C.. 1990. ‘The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The law Merchant, Private Judges, and the Champagne Fairs’. Economics & Politics 2(1):1–23.Google Scholar
Miller, William L. 2006. ‘Corruption and Corruptibility’. World Development 34(2):371–380.Google Scholar
Miller, William Lockley, Grødeland, Åse B.Koshechkina, Tatyana Y.. 2001. A Culture of Corruption: Coping with Government in Post-communist Europe. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar
Montinola, Gabriella R.Jackman, Robert W.. 2002. ‘Sources of Corruption: A Cross-country Study’. British Journal of Political Science 32(1):147–170.Google Scholar
Myerson, Roger B. 1993. ‘Effectiveness of Electoral Systems for Reducing Government Corruption: A Game-theoretic Analysis’. Games and Economic Behavior 5(1):118–132.Google Scholar
Olken, Benjamin A.Barron, Patrick. 2009. ‘The Simple Economics of Extortion: Evidence from Trucking in Aceh’. Journal of Political Economy 117(3):417–452.Google Scholar
Peters, John G.Welch, Susan. 1980. ‘The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections’. The American Political Science Review 74(3):697–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Anna, Rothstein, BoTeorell, Jan. 2012. ‘Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail—Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem’. Governance 26(3):449–471.Google Scholar
Razafindrakoto, MireilleRoubaud, François. 2010. ‘Are International Databases on Corruption Reliable? A Comparison of Expert Opinion Surveys and Household Surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa’. World Development 38(8):1057–1069.Google Scholar
Riley, Stephen P. 1998. ‘The Political Economy of Anti-corruption Strategies in Africa’. The European Journal of Development Research 10(1):129–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shleifer, A.Vishny, R.W.. 1993. ‘Corruption’. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3):599–617.Google Scholar
Sung, H.-E. 2004. ‘Democracy and Political Corruption: A Cross-national Comparison’. Crime, Law and Social Change 41(2):179–193.Google Scholar
Szeftel, Morris. 1998. ‘Misunderstanding African politics: Corruption and the Governance Agenda’. Review of African Political Economy 25(76):221–240.Google Scholar
Takahashi, S. 2010. ‘Community Enforcement when Players Observe Partners’ Past Play’. Journal of Economic Theory 145(1):42–62.Google Scholar
Tanzi, VitoDavoodi, Hamid. 2002. Corruption, Growth, and Public Finances. In The Political Economy of Corruption, edited by A.K. Jain. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tirole, Jean. 1996. ‘A Theory of Collective Reputations (with Applications to the Persistence of Corruption and to Firm Quality)’. The Review of Economic Studies 63(1):1–22.Google Scholar
Van Rijckeghem, CarolineWeder, Beatrice. 2001. ‘Bureaucratic Corruption and the Rate of Temptation: Do Wages in the Civil Service Affect Corruption, and by How Much?’ Journal of Development Economics 65(2):307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Q. 2002. ‘A Folk Theorem for Repeated Sequential Games’. Review of Economic Studies 69(2):493–512.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Popa Dataset

Dataset

http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/23449
Link
Supplementary material: File

Popa Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Popa Supplementary Material(File)
File 10.8 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Popa Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Popa Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 169.7 KB