Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:41:28.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are voters too afraid to tackle corruption? Survey and experimental evidence from Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2021

Omar García-Ponce Open the ORCID record for Omar García-Ponce [Opens in a new window] ,
Thomas Zeitzoff  and
Leonard Wantchekon
Omar García-Ponce*
Affiliation:
George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
Thomas Zeitzoff
Affiliation:
American University, Washington, DC, USA
Leonard Wantchekon
Affiliation:
Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Are individuals in violent contexts reluctant to tackle corruption for fear of future violence? Or does violence mobilize them to fight corruption? We investigate these questions looking at the effects of fear and violence stemming from the Mexican Drug War on attitudes toward corruption. We conducted two surveys before the 2012 Mexican presidential election. First, as part of a nationally representative survey, we find a positive correlation between fear of violence and willingness to accept corruption in exchange for lower levels of violence. To disentangle causal effects, we conducted a follow-up survey experiment in Greater Mexico City where we manipulated fear over the Drug War. We find that individuals within this context are not easily scared. Those who received a common fear-inducing manipulation do not report higher levels of fear and are less willing to tolerate corruption. Conversely, we find strong evidence that individuals who have been victims of crime are more likely to report both higher levels of fear and willingness to accept corruption if it lowers violence. Our findings suggest that voters are more strategic and resilient in the face of violence than many extant theories of political behavior suggest.

Keywords

Civil/domestic conflictcomparative politics: developing countriescomparative politics: political behaviorexperimentalresearch
Type
Original Article
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 709 - 727
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are grateful to Alberto Díaz-Cayeros, Oeindrila Dube, Beatriz Magaloni, Horacio Larreguy, and participants at the USMEX, MPSA, and LACEA conferences, for valuable comments and suggestions. All errors remain ours.

References

Albertson, B and Gadarian, SK (2015) Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albertson, B and Gadarian, SK (2016) Did that scare you? Tips on creating emotion in experimental subjects. Political Analysis 24, 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anduiza, E, Gallego, A and Muñoz, J (2013) Turning a blind eye experimental evidence of partisan bias in attitudes toward corruption. Comparative Political Studies 46, 1664–1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A, Green, DP, McManus, J and Pande, R (2014) Are poor voters indifferent to whether elected leaders are criminal or corrupt? A vignette experiment in rural India. Political Communication 31, 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, R (2012) Crime victimization and political participation. American Political Science Review 1–6, 570–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattman, C (2009) From violence to voting: war and political participation in Uganda. American Political Science Review 103, 231–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonner, RC (2012) The cartel crackdown: winning the drug war and rebuilding Mexico in the process. Foreign Affairs 91, 12.Google Scholar
Brader, T (2005) Striking a responsive chord: how political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science 49, 388–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, M (2008) Vote buying and violence in Nigerian election campaigns. Electoral Studies 27, 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callen, M, Isaqzadeh, M, Long, JD and Sprenger, C (2014) Violence and risk preference: experimental evidence from Afghanistan. The American Economic Review 104, 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, AC and Trivedi, PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chong, A, De La, O, Ana, L, Karlan, D and Wantchekon, L (2015) Does corruption information inspire the fight or quash the hope? A field experiment in Mexico on voter turnout, choice, and party identification. Journal of Politics 77, 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusack, K, Jonas, DE, Forneris, CA, Wines, C, Sonis, J, Middleton, JC, Feltner, C, Brownley, KA, Olmsted, KR and Greenblatt, A, Weil, A and Gaynes, BN (2016) Psychological treatments for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 43, 128–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dal Bó, E, Dal Bó, P and Di Tella, R (2006) “Plata o Plomo?”: bribe and punishment in a theory of political influence. American Political Science Review 100, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, M (2015) Trafficking networks and the Mexican Drug War. American Economic Review 105, 1738–1779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P (1992) An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and EMotion 6, 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, JD (1999) Electoral accountability and the control of politicians: selecting good types versus sanctioning poor performance. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation 55, 61.Google Scholar
Foa, EB, Dancu, CV, Hembree, EA, Jaycox, LH, Meadows, EA and Street, GP (1999) A comparison of exposure therapy, stress inoculation training, and their combination for reducing posttraumatic stress disorder in female assault victims. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 67, 194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frijda, NH (1986) The Emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gadarian, SK (2010) The politics of threat: how terrorism news shapes foreign policy attitudes. The Journal of Politics 72, 469–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadarian, SK and Albertson, B (2014) Anxiety, immigration, and the search for information. Political Psychology 35, 133–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, MJ, Pasquale, BJ and Samii, CD (2014) Civil war and social capital: behavioral-game evidence from Nepal. American Journal of Political Science 58, 604–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, M (2006) Some puzzles of political corruption in modern advanced democracies. In Unpublished manuscript. Annual Meetings of the Japan Political Science Association, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Hatemi, PK and McDermott, R (2011) Man is by Nature a Political Animal: Evolution, Biology, and Politics. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haushofer, J, de Laat, J, Chemin, M and Archambault, C (2013) Negative rainfall shocks increase levels of the stress hormone cortisol among poor farmers in Kenya. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Healy, A and Malhotra, N (2009) Myopic voters and natural disaster policy. American Political Science Review 103, 387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, DL (2001) The Deadly Ethnic Riot. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, L and Feldman, S (2011) Americans respond politically to 9/11: understanding the impact of the terrorist attacks and their aftermath. American Psychologist 66, 455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huddy, L, Feldman, S, Lahav, G and Taber, C (2003) Fear and terrorism: psychological reactions to 9/11. In Fagerberg, J, Mowery, DC and Nelson, RR (eds), Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government and the Public. New York: Routeledge. chapter 13, pp. 255–78.Google Scholar
Jost, JT, Napier, JL, Thorisdottir, H, Gosling, SD, Palfai, TP and Ostafin, B (2007) Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33, 989–1007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalyvas, SN (2015) How civil wars help explain organized crime—and how they do not. Journal of Conflict Resolution 59, 1517–1540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klašnja, M and Tucker, JA (2013) The economy, corruption, and the vote: evidence from experiments in Sweden and Moldova. Electoral Studies 32, 536–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, R, Nanetti, RY and Putnam, RD (2001) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, JS, Gonzalez, RM, Small, DA and Fischhoff, B (2003) Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: a national field experiment. Psychological Science 14, 144–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerner, JS, Small, DA and Loewenstein, G (2004) Heart strings and purse strings: carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science 15, 337–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lessing, B (2015) Logics of violence in criminal war. Journal of Conflict Resolution 59, 1486–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, A and Menning, JO (2009) When can politicians scare citizens into supporting bad policies?. American Journal of Political Science 53, 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzetti, L and Wilson, CJ (2007) Why do corrupt governments maintain public support?. Comparative political studies 40, 949–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G, Neuman, WR and MacKuen, M (2000) Affective Intelligence and Political Judgement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, KM and Rockmore, M (2014) Fear's effect on political participation: evidence from Africa1. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Muñoz, J, Anduiza, E and Gallego, A (2012) Why do voters forgive corrupt politicians? Cynicism, noise and implicit exchange. In International Political Science Association Conference, Madrid, July.Google Scholar
North, DC, Joseph Wallis, J, Webb, SB and Weingast, BR (2012) In the Shadow of Violence: Politics, Economics, and the Problems of Development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, EL (2012) Mexico's 2012 elections: key issues and critical questions now and beyond. Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars. Mexico Institute.Google Scholar
Osorio, J (2012) Democratization and drug violence in Mexico. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Phillips, BJ (2015) How does leadership decapitation affect violence? The case of drug trafficking organizations in Mexico. The Journal of Politics 77, 324–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reno, W (1999) Warlord Politics and African States. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Rios, V (2015) How government coordination controlled organized crime, the case of Mexico's cocaine markets. Journal of Conflict Resolution 59, 1433–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, PR and Rubin, DB (1985) The bias due to incomplete matching. Biometrics 41, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rundquist, BS, Strom, GS and Peters, JG (1977) Corrupt politicians and their electoral support: some experimental observations. American Political Science Review 71, 954–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sambanis, N (2004) Poverty and the organization of political violence. In Brookings Trade Forum. Brookings Institution Press, pp. 165–211.Google Scholar
Schedler, A (2016) The criminal community of victims and perpetrators: cognitive foundations of citizen detachment from organized violence in Mexico. Human Rights Quarterly 38, 1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searles, K and Mattes, K (2015) It's a mad, mad world: using emotion inductions in a survey. Journal of Experimental Political Science 2, 172–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirk, D and Wallman, J (2015) Understanding Mexico's drug violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution 59, 1348–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shleifer, A and Vishny, RW (1993) Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thórisdóttir, H and Jost, JT (2011) Motivated closed-mindedness mediates the effect of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology 32, 785–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wantchekon, L (2003) Clientelism and voting behavior: evidence from a field experiment in Benin. World Politics 55, 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wantchekon, L (2004) The paradox of ”Warlord” democracy: a theoretical investigation. American Political Science Review 98, 17–33.Google Scholar
Watkins, ER (2008) Constructive and unconstructive repetitive thought. Psychological bulletin 134, 163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weber, M (1919) Politik als Beruf. Muenchen: Duncker & Humblodt.Google Scholar
Winters, MS and Weitz-Shapiro, R (2013) Lacking information or condoning corruption: when do voters support corrupt politicians?. Comparative Politics 45, 418–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, LE (2016) The psychology of political risk: repression, fear and mobilization. Working Paper.Google Scholar
Zechmeister, EJ (2014) The Political Culture of Democracy in the Americas, 2014: Democratic Governance across 10 Years of the AmericasBarometer. Technical report United States Agency for International Development (USAID).Google Scholar
Zeitzoff, T (2014) Anger, exposure to violence, and intragroup conflict: a “Lab in the Field” experiment in Southern Israel. Political Psychology 35, 309–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

García-Ponce et al. Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/333INW
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

García-Ponce et al. Supplementary Materials

García-Ponce et al. Supplementary Materials

Download García-Ponce et al. Supplementary Materials(PDF)
PDF 273.7 KB