Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T08:53:15.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Property Rights Regimes, Technological Innovation, and Foreign Direct Investment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2018

Mark David Nieman  and
Cameron G. Thies
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We argue that democratic institutions influence property rights in attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) by providing: (1) a coherent logic to the property rights regime that is created in a state and (2) a legitimate way to manage conflicts that arise in dynamic economies. We expect that the marginal effect of property rights in attracting FDI has increased over time with the rate of technological dynamism. We test this using a non-nested multilevel modeling strategy with random coefficients on data from 1970 to 2009. Our results demonstrate that the effect of property rights on attracting FDI is contingent on democratic institutions and that this effect becomes more pronounced over time. This effect holds for both developing and developed countries across all regions.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Political Science Research and Methods , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , July 2019 , pp. 451 - 469
Copyright
© The European Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Mark David Nieman, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Iowa State University, 537 Ross Hall, Ames, IA 50011 ([email protected]). Cameron G. Thies, Professor, School of Politics and Global Studies, Arizona State University, 6748 Lattie F. Coor Hall, Tempe, AZ, 85287 ([email protected]). The authors would like to thank Guy Whitten and the participants of the “Innovations in Comparative Methodology” conference hosted by the European Union Center at Texas A&M University. They give special thanks to Vera Troeger for her editorial guidance and to the three anonymous reviewers. To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2017.46

References

Aykut, Dilek, and Sayek, Solin. 2007. ‘The Role of the Sectoral Composition of Foreign Investment on Growth’. In Lucia Piscitello and Grazia D. Santangelo (eds), Do Multinationals Feed Local Development and Growth?, 35–62. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard, Braconier, Henrik, and Forslid, Rikard. 2005. ‘Multinationals, Endogenous Growth, and Technological Spillovers: Theory and Evidence’. Review of International Economics 13(5):945–963.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2006. ‘Random Coefficient Models for Time-Series-Cross-Section Data: Monte Carlo Experiments’. Political Analysis 15(2):182–195.Google Scholar
Biglaiser, Glen, and Staats, Joseph L.. 2010. ‘Do Political Institutions Affect Foreign Direct Investment? A Survey of U.S. Corporations in Latin America’. Political Research Quarterly 63(3):508–522.Google Scholar
Blanton, Shannon Lindsey, and Blanton, Robert G.. 2007. ‘What Attracts Foreign Investors? An Examination of Human Rights and Foreign Direct Investment’. Journal of Politics 69(1):143–155.Google Scholar
Blonigen, Bruce A, and Piger, Jeremy. 2014. ‘Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment’. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revu canadienne d’économique 47(3):775–812.Google Scholar
Borensztein, Eduardo, Gregorio, Jose De, and Lee, Jong-Wha. 1998. ‘How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?’. Journal of International Economics 45(1):115–135.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Smith, Alastair, Siverson, Randolph M., and Morrow, James D.. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cao, Xun, and Ward, Michael. 2014. ‘Do Democracies Attract Portfolio Investment? Transnational Portfolio Investments Modeled as Dynamic Network’. International Interactions 40(2):216–245.Google Scholar
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2003. Globalisation, Economic Development, and the Role of the State. London: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Chinn, Menzie D., and Ito, Hiro. 2008. ‘A New Measure of Financial Openness’. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 10(3):309–322.Google Scholar
Choi, Seung-Whan. 2009. ‘The Effects of Outliers on Regression Analysis: Regime Type and Foreign Direct Investment’. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4(2):153–165.Google Scholar
Choi, Seung-Whan. 2013. ‘The Democratic Peace Through an Interaction of Domestic Institutions and Norms: Executive Constraints and Rule of Law’. Armed Forces and Society 39(2):255–283.Google Scholar
Chyzh, Olga. 2014. ‘Can You Trust a Dictator: A Strategic Model of Authoritarian Regimes’ Signaling and Compliance With International Treaties’. Conflict Management and Peace Science 31(1):3–27.Google Scholar
Chyzh, Olga. 2016. ‘Dangerous Liaisons: An Endogenous Model of International Trade and Human Rights’. Journal of Peace Research 53(3):409–423.Google Scholar
Chyzh, Olga. 2017. ‘Keeping Up With Which Joneses: Spatial Diffusion of Rule of Law Through Economic International Organizations’. Foreign Policy Analysis 13(1):28–49.Google Scholar
Ciravegna, Luciano. 2011. ‘FDI, Social Ties and Technological Learning in New Silicon Valley Clones. Evidence from the Costa Rican ICT Cluster’. The Journal of Development Studies 47(8):1178–1198.Google Scholar
Clague, Christopher, Keefer, Philip, Knack, Stephen, and Olson, Mancur. 1996. ‘Property and Contract Rights in Autocracies and Democracies’. Journal of Economic Growth 1:243–276.Google Scholar
Danilovic, Vesna, and Clare, Joe. 2007. ‘The Kantian Liberal Peace (Revisited)’. American Journal of Political Science 51(2):397–414.Google Scholar
Dreher, Axel, Gaston, Noel, and Martens, Pim. 2008. Measuring Globalisation. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Frye, Timothy. 2002. ‘Capture or Exchange? Business Lobbying in Russia’. Europe-Asia Studies 54(7):1017–1036.Google Scholar
Frye, Timothy. 2004. ‘Credible Commitment and Property Rights: Evidence from Russia’. American Political Science Review 98(3):453–466.Google Scholar
Frye, Timothy. 2006. ‘Original Sin, Good Works, and Property Rights in Russia’. World Politics 58(4):479–504.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M., and Randazzo, Kirk A.. 2011. ‘Testing the Effects of Independent Judiciaries on the Likelihood of Democratic Backsliding’. American Journal of Political Science 55(3):696–709.Google Scholar
Glass, Amy Jocelyn, and Saggi, Kamal. 1998. ‘International Technology Transfer and the Technology Gap’. Journal of Development Economics 55(2):369–398.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, and Ward, Michael D.. 1997. ‘Double Take: A Reexamination of Democracy and Autocracy in Modern Polities’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(3):361–383.Google Scholar
Gwartney, James, and Hall, Joshua. 2003. ‘The Concept and Measurement of Economic Freedom’. European Journal of Political Economy 19(3):405–430.Google Scholar
Gwartney, James, Hall, Joshua, and Lawson, Robert. 2011. Economic Freedom of the World: 2010 Annual Report. Vancouver, B.C: Economic Freedom Network.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufmann, Robert R. (eds) 1992. The Politics of Economic Adjustment: International Constraints, Distributive Conflicts, and the State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hamburg, Margaret A. 2012. ‘Rules for Compounding Pharmacies Need to Change’. Washington Post. 20 December. Available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/rules-for-compounding-pharmacies-need-to-change/2012/12/20/77863788-4938-11e2-ad54-580638ede391_story.html?wpisrc=emailtoafriend, accessed 12 December 2012.Google Scholar
Hays, Jude C. 2009. Globalization & the New Politics of Embedded Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoff, Karla Ruth, and Stiglitz, Joseph E.. 2005. ‘The Creation of the Rule of Law and the Legitimacy of Property Rights: The Political and Economic Consequences of a Corrupt Privatization’. Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 11772, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
IMF. 2007. Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual 6th ed. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Jakobsen, Jo, and de Soysa, Indra. 2006. ‘Do Foreign Investors Punish Democracy? Theory and Empirics, 1984-2001’. Kyklos 59(3):383–410.Google Scholar
Javorcik, Beata Smarzynska. 2004. ‘The Composition of Foreign Direct Investment and Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: Evidence from Transition Economies’. European Economic Review 48(1):39–62.Google Scholar
Jensen, Nathan. 2003. ‘Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment’. International Organization. 57(3):587–616.Google Scholar
Jensen, Nathan. 2008. ‘Political Risk, Democratic Institutions, and Foreign Direct Investment’. Journal of Politics 70(4):1040–1052.Google Scholar
Kam, Cindy D., and Franzese, Robert J. Jr. 2007. Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, and Roberts, Margaret. 2014. ‘How Robust Standard Errors Expose Methodological Problems They Do Not Fix, and What to Do About it’. Political Analysis 23(2):1–21.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krieckhaus, Jonathan. 2004. ‘The Regime Debate Revisited: A Sensitivity Analysis of Democracy’s Economic Effect’. British Journal of Political Science 34(4):635–655.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon. 1973. Population, Capital and Growth. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Li, Quan. 2006. ‘Democracy, Autocracy, and Tax Incentives to Foreign Direct Investors: A Cross-National Analysis’. Journal of Politics 68(1):62–74.Google Scholar
Li, Quan. 2009. ‘Outlier, Measurement, and the Democracy-FDI Controversy’. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4(2):167–181.Google Scholar
Li, Quan, and Resnick, Adam. 2003. ‘Democratic Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to Developing Countries’. International Organization. 57(1):175–211.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arendt. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Linzer, Drew A., and Staton, Jeffrey K.. 2015. ‘A Global Measure of Judicial Independence, 1948-2012’. Journal of Law and Courts 3(2):223–256.Google Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2016. ‘Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2015’. Available at http://www.systemicpeace.org/polityproject.html, accessed 18 August 2016.Google Scholar
McGuire, Martin C., and Olson, Mancur. 1996. ‘The Economics of Autocracy and Majority Rule: The Invisible Hand and the Use of Force’. Journal of Economic Literature 34(1):72–96.Google Scholar
Moore, Gordon E. 1965. ‘Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits’. Electronics 38(8):1–4.Google Scholar
Moran, Theodore H. 2002. Beyond Sweatshops: Foreign Direct Investment and Globalization in Developing Nations. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institute Press.Google Scholar
Mousseau, Michael. 2003. ‘The Nexus of Market Society, Liberal Preferences, and Democratic Peace: Interdisciplinary Theory and Evidence’. International Studies Quarterly 47(4):483–510.Google Scholar
Nieman, Mark David. 2011. ‘Shocks and Turbulence: Globalization and the Occurrence of Civil War’. International Interactions 37(3):263–292.Google Scholar
Nieman, Mark David. 2016. ‘Moments in Time: Temporal Patterns in the Effect of Democracy and Trade on Conflict’. Conflict Management and Peace Science 33(3):273–293.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1978. ‘Reflections on the Patterns of Change in the Bureaucratic Authoritarian State’. Latin American Research Review 3(1):3–38.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1991. ‘Autocracy, Democracy, and Prosperity’. In Richard J. Zechhauser (ed.), Strategy and Choice, 131–157. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1993. ‘Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development’. American Political Science Review 87(3):567–576.Google Scholar
Oneal, John R. 1994. ‘The Affinity of Foreign Investors for Authoritarian Regimes’. Political Research Quarterly 47(3):565–588.Google Scholar
Park, Jong Hee. 2012. ‘A Unified Method for Dynamic and Cross-Sectional Heterogeneity: Introducing Hidden Markov Panel Models’. American Journal of Political Science 56(4):1040–1054.Google Scholar
Randazzo, Kirk A., Gibler, Douglas M., and Reid, Rebecca. 2016. ‘Examining the Development of Judicial Independence’. Political Research Quarterly 69(3):583–593.Google Scholar
Schulz, Heiner. 2009. ‘Political Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment in Developing Countries: Does the Sector Matter?’. Social Science Research Network, Working Paper Series, Rochester, NY.Google Scholar
Soper, Daniel S., Dermirkan, Haluk, Goul, Michael, and Louis, Robert St.. 2012. ‘An Empirical Evaluation of the Impact of ICT Investments on Future Levels of Institutionalized Democracy and Foreign Direct Investment in Emerging Societies’. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13(3):116–149.Google Scholar
Strange, Susan. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1997. Free Markets and Social Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2011. World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Zheng, Yu. 2011. ‘Credibility and Flexibility: Political Institutions, Governance, and Foreign Direct Investment’. International Interactions. 37(3):293–319.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Nieman and Thies Dataset

Dataset

http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/P5SZTR
Link
Supplementary material: File

Nieman and Thies supplementary material

Appendix

Download Nieman and Thies supplementary material(File)
File 304.7 KB