Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:33:55.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Geographic Information Systems to Measure District Change, 2000–2002

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Michael H. Crespin
Michael H. Crespin*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Michigan State University, 303 S. Kedzie Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I use geographic information systems to develop a continuous measure of district continuity and change following the 2000–02 congressional redistricting cycle. The new measure provides details of where the new population in a district came from and how the old population was distributed within new districts. This measure is then used to demonstrate the independent and interactive influence of district change on competition for congressional elections.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , Summer 2005 , pp. 253 - 260
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M. Jr., and Charles, Stewart III. 2000. “Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage” American Journal of Political Science 44: 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker v. Carr. 1962. 369 U.S. 186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldstad, Paul. 2002. GIS Fundamentals. White Bear Lake, Minnesota: Elder Press.Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles S. 1975. “Redistricting and Congressional Stability, 1962–1972.” Journal of Politics 37: 569–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Jamie L., Crespin, Michael H., Finocchiaro, Charles J., and Rohde, David W. 2004. “Linking Congressional Districts across Time: Redistricting and Party Polarization in Congress.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. 2003. Politics In America: 2004. The 108th Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Katz, Jonathan N. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespin, Michael H. 2005. “Out with the Old, In with the New: Redistricting and Individual Campaign Contributions to Congressional Candidates.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1972. “Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 66: 1234–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1977. “U.S. House Members in Their Constituencies: An Exploration.” American Political Science Review 71: 883–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald Philip, and Krasno, Jonathan S. 1988. “Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 32: 884–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Donald Philip, and Krasno, Jonathan S. 1990. “Rebuttal to Jacobson's New Evidence for Old Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., Larson, Bruce A., and Globetti, Suzanne. 2003. “The Redistricting Cycle and Strategic Candidate Decisions in U.S. House Races.” Journal of Politics 65: 1221–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1980. Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1990. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 334–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2004. The Politics of Congressional Elections. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Dimock, Michael A. 1994. “Checking Out: The Effects of Bank Overdrafts on the 1992 House Elections” American Journal of Political Science 38: 601–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, William G. 1991. Data Theory and Dimensional Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds v. Sims. 1964. 377 U.S. 533.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1973. “The Relationship between Seats and Votes in Two-Party Systems.” American Political Science Review 67: 540–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesberry v. Sanders. 1964. 376 U.S. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeller, Richard A., and Carmines, Edward G. 1980. Measurement in the Social Sciences: The Link between Theory and Data. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Crespin Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Crespin Supplementary Material(File)
File 62.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Crespin Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Crespin Supplementary Material(File)
File 477 Bytes