Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:52:18.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modeling Dependencies in International Relations Networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Peter D. Hoff  and
Michael D. Ward
Peter D. Hoff
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195. e-mail: [email protected]
Michael D. Ward
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the desire to focus on the interconnected nature of politics and economics at the global scale, most empirical studies in the field of international relations assume not only that the major actors are sovereign, but also that their relationships are portrayed in data that are modeled as independent phenomena. In contrast, this article illustrates the use of linear and bilinear random—effects models to represent statistical dependencies that often characterize dyadic data such as international relations. In particular, we show how to estimate models for dyadic data that simultaneously take into account: (a) regressor variables, (b) correlation of actions having the same actor, (c) correlation of actions having the same target, (d) correlation of actions between a pair of actors (i.e., reciprocity of actions), and (e) third-order dependencies, such as transitivity, clustering, and balance. We apply this new approach to the political relations among a wide range of political actors in Central Asia over the period 1989–1999, illustrating the presence and strength of second- and third-order statistical dependencies in these data.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , Spring 2004 , pp. 160 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Political Methodology 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azar, Edward. 1980. “The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) Project.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 24: 143–152.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, and Katz, Jonathan. 2001. “Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water: A Comment on Green, Kim, and Loon.” International Organization 55: 487–496.Google Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Katz, Jonathan, and Tucker, Richard. 1998. “Taking Time Seriously: Time Series Cross Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 1260–1288.Google Scholar
Bennett, D. Scott, and Stam, Allan. 2000. “Research Note: A Cross-Validation of Bueno de Mesquita and Lalman's International Interaction Game.” British Journal of Political Science 30: 541–561.Google Scholar
Berelson, Bernard. 1952. Content Analysis in Communication Research. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brecher, Michael, and Wilkenfeld, Jonathan. 2000. A Study of Crisis, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Enterline, Andrew. 1996. “Driving While Democratizing.” International Security 20(4): 183–96.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Kuno Ruben. 1978. “Least Squares Approximation of Matrices by Additive and Multiplicative Models.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B. Methodological 40(2): 186–196.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Kuno Ruben. 1998. “Generalised Bilinear Regression.” Biometrika 85: 689–700.Google Scholar
Gartzke, Erik A., and Simon, Michael W. 1996. “Political System Similarity and the Choice of Allies: Do Democracies Flock Together, or Do Opposites Attract?” Journal of Conflict Resolution 40: 617–635.Google Scholar
Gerner, Deborah J., Schrodt, Philip A., Francisco, Ronald, and Weddle, Judith L. 1994. “The Analysis of Political Events Using Machine Coded Data.” International Studies Quarterly 38: 91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, Paramjit S., and Swartz, Tim B. 2001. “Statistical Analyses for Round Robin Interaction Data.” Canadian Journal of Statistics. La Revue Canadienne de Statistique 29(2): 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian S. 2002. All International Politics Is Local: The Diffusion of Conflict, Integration, and Democratization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Gleditsch, Kristian S., and Ward, Michael D. 2001. “Measuring Space: A Minimum Distance Database and Applications to International Studies.” Journal of Peace Research 38: 749–768.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Joshua. 1992. “A Conflict-Cooperation Scale for WEIS International Events Data.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36: 369–385.Google Scholar
Haushofer, Karl, Obst, Ernst, Lautensach, Hans, and Maull, Otto, eds. 1928. Bausteine zur Geopolitik. Berlin: Kurt Vowinckel Verlag.Google Scholar
Heagerty, Patrick, Ward, Michael D., and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. 2002. “Windows of Opportunity: Window Subseries Empirical Variance Estimators in International Relations.” Political Analysis 10: 304–317.Google Scholar
Herz, John H. 1950. “Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 2(2): 157–180.Google Scholar
Hewitt, J. Joseph. 2003. “Dyadic Processes and International Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 47: 669–692.Google Scholar
Hoff, Peter D. 2003a. “Bilinear Mixed Effects Models for Dyadic Data.” Working paper no. 32. Center for Statistics and Social Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Hoff, Peter D. 2003b. “Random Effects Models for Network Data.” In Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, eds. Breiger, Ronald, Carley, Kathleen, and Pattison, Philippa. Committee on Human Factors. Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences Education, National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, pp. 303–312.Google Scholar
Hoff, Peter D., Raftery, Adrian E., and Handcock, Mark S. 2002. “Latent Space Approaches to Social Network Analysis.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 97: 1090–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellén, Rudolf. 1916. Staten som Lifsform [The State as an Organism]. Stockholm: Hugo Geber.Google Scholar
Lai, David. 1995. “A Structural Approach to Alignment: A Case Study of the China-Soviet-U.S. Strategic Triangle, 1971–1988.” International Interactions 20: 349–374.Google Scholar
Leeds, Brett Ashley. 2003. “Do Alliances Deter Aggression? The Influence of Military Alliances on the Initiation of Militarized Interstate Disputes.” American Journal of Political Science 47: 427–429.Google Scholar
Li, Heng. 2002. “Modeling through Group Invariance: An Interesting Example with Potential Applications.” Annals of Statistics 30: 1069–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Heng, and Loken, Eric. 2002. “A Unified Theory of Statistical Analysis and Inference for Variance Component Models for Dyadic Data.” Statistica Sinica 12: 519–535.Google Scholar
MacEachern, Steven N., and Berliner, Mark L. 1994. “Subsampling the Gibbs Sampler.” American Statistician 48(3): 188–190.Google Scholar
Mackinder, Halford J. 1904. “The Geographical Pivot of History.” Geographical Journal 23: 421–444.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Pollins, Brian M., eds. 2003. Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward, and Snyder, Jack. 1995. “Democratization and the Danger of War.” International Security 20: 5–38.Google Scholar
Maoz, Zeev, and Russett, Bruce M. 1993. “Normative and Structural Causes of Democratic Peace, 1946–1986.” American Political Science Review 87: 624–38.Google Scholar
Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10: 134–153.Google Scholar
McClelland, Charles A., and Hoggard, Gary. 1969. “Conflict Patterns in the Interactions among Nations.” In International Politics and Foreign Policy, ed. Rosenau, James N. New York: Free Press, pp. 711–724.Google Scholar
Mousseau, Michael. 1997. “Democracy and Militarized Interstate Conflicts, 1816–1992.” Journal of Peace Research 34(1): 73–87.Google Scholar
North, Robert C. 1967. “Perception and Action in the 1914 Crisis.” Journal of International Affairs 21: 103–122.Google Scholar
North, Robert C., Holsti, Ole R., Zaninovich, M. George, and Zinnes, Dina A. 1963. Content Analysis: A Handbook with Applications for the Study of International Crisis. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Nowicki, Krzysztof, and Snijders, Tom A. B. 2001. “Estimation and Prediction for Stochastic Blockstructures.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 96: 1077–1987.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2002. “A Statistical Model of Bilateral Cooperation.” Political Analysis 10: 101–112.Google Scholar
Rätzel, Friedrich. 1879. Politische Geographie. Munich: Oldenburg.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M., and Oneal, John R. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M., Oneal, John R., and Berbaum, Michael. 2003. “Causes of Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885–1992.” International Studies Quarterly 47: 371–393.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M., Oneal, John R., and Davis, David R. 1998. “The Third Leg of the Kantian Tripod for Peace: International Organizations and Militarized Disputes, 1950–1985.” International Organization 52: 441–468.Google Scholar
Schrodt, Philip A. 2000. “Forecasting Conflict in the Balkans Using Hidden Markov Models.” Presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Schrodt, Philip A., Davis, Shannon G., and Weddle, Judith L. 1994. “Political Science: KEDS-A Program for the Machine Coding of Event Data.” Social Science Computer Review 12: 561–588.Google Scholar
Signorino, Curtis. 1999. “Strategic Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of International Conflict.” American Political Science Review 92: 279–298.Google Scholar
Signorino, Curtis S. 2003. “Structure and Uncertainty in Discrete Choice Models.” Political Analysis 11: 316–344.Google Scholar
Smith, Alastair. 1999. “Testing Theories of Strategic Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 43: 1254–1283.Google Scholar
Tobler, Waldo. 1979. “Cellular Geography.” In Philosphy in Geography, eds. Gale, S. and Olsson, G. Dortrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel, pp. 379–386.Google Scholar
Ward, Michael D., Hoff, Peter D., and Lofdahl, Corey Lowell. 2003. “Identifying International Networks: Latent Spaces and Imputation”. In Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, eds. Breiger, Ronald, Carley, Kathleen, and Pattison, Philippa. Committee on Human Factors, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences Education, National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, pp. 345–360.Google Scholar
Ward, Michael D., and Kirby, Andrew M. 1987. “Re-examining Spatial Models of International Conflict.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 77: 86–105.Google Scholar
Warner, R., Kenny, David A., and Stoto, Michael A. 1979. “A New Round Robin Analysis of Variance for Social Interaction Data.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 1742–1757.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Stanley, and Faust, Katherine. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, Stanley, and Pattison, Phillipa. 1996. “Logit Models and Logistic Regression for Social Networks: I. An Introduction to Markov Graphs and p∗.” Psychometrika 61: 401–425.Google Scholar
Wilkenfeld, Jonathan. 2001. “The International Crisis Behavior Project: Origins, Current Status, and Future Directions.” Presented at the Conference on Data Collection on Armed Conflict, June 8–9, Uppsala, Sweden. (Available from http://www.pcr.uu.se/wilkenfeld.zip.Google Scholar
Wong, George Y. 1982. “Round Robin Analysis of Variance via Maximum Likelihood.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 77: 714–724.Google Scholar
Zinnes, Dina A. 1967. “An Analytical Study of the Balance of Power Theories.” Journal of Peace Research 3: 270–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar