Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:04:24.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to the Virtual Issue: Addressing Measurement Comparability in Survey Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Sebastián M. Saiegh
Sebastián M. Saiegh*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 23 , Virtual Issue V9: Measurement Comparability in Survey Research , August 2015 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Political Methodology 2015 

References

Aldrich, John H., and McKelvey, Richard. 1977. “A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential Elections,” American Political Science Review, 71: 111–130.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Nagler, Jonathan. 2004. “Party System Compactness: Measurement and Consequences,” Political Analysis, 12: 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry E. 1985. “The perils of survey research: Inter-personally incomparable responses,” Political Methodology, 11: 26991.Google Scholar
Hare, Christopher, Armstrong, David A., Bakker, Ryan, Carroll, Royce, and Poole, Keith T. 2015. “Using Bayesian Aldrich-McKelvey Scaling to Study Citizens' Ideological Preferences and Perceptions,” American Journal of Political Science, 59: 759–774.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Murray, Christopher J.L., Salomon, Joshua A., and Tandon, Ajay. 2004. “Enhancing the Validity and Cross-cultural Comparability of Survey Research,” American Political Science Review 97: 4.Google Scholar