Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T22:58:29.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpreting the Coefficient of Party Influence: Comment on Krehbiel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Tim Groseclose  and
James M. Snyder Jr.
Tim Groseclose
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 14305. e-mail: [email protected]
James M. Snyder Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Keith Krehbiel (2003) provides a thoughtful note that explains why the estimation strategy we proposed in Snyder and Groseclose (2000) cannot distinguish between majority-party influence and minority-party influence theories. We agree with Krehbiel's major points. In this note, we explain our disagreement with some of his minor points, and we suggest an additional assumption under which our method can distinguish between majority-party influence and minority-party influence.

Type
Replications and Extensions
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , Winter 2003 , pp. 104 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economics Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim. 1996. “An Examination of the Market for Favors and Votes in Congress.” Economic Inquiry 34:320–340.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 1996. “Buying Supermajorities.” American Political Science Review 90:303–315.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2003. “The Coefficient of Party Influence.” Political Analysis 11:95–103.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1961. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Science Editions.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1974. Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. Lasalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Snyder, James M. Jr., and Groseclose, Tim. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 44:193–211.Google Scholar
Snyder, James M. Jr., and Ting, Michael. 2002. “An Informational Rationale for Political Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 46:90–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar