Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Chou, Winston
Dancygier, Rafaela
Egami, Naoki
and
Jamal, Amaney A.
2021.
Competing for Loyalists? How Party Positioning Affects Populist Radical Right Voting.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 54,
Issue. 12,
p.
2226.
Tanaka, Ayumu
Ito, Banri
and
Jinji, Naoto
2022.
Individual Preferences Toward Inward Foreign Direct Investment: A Conjoint Survey Experiment.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Zhao, Anqi
and
Ding, Peng
2022.
Regression-based causal inference with factorial experiments: estimands, model specifications and design-based properties.
Biometrika,
Vol. 109,
Issue. 3,
p.
799.
Ward, Peter
and
Denney, Steven
2022.
Welfare chauvinism among co‐ethnics: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in South Korea.
International Migration,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 5,
p.
74.
Levatino, Antonina
2022.
What do exchange students value when choosing a destination for their study period abroad? A conjoint experiment.
Globalisation, Societies and Education,
p.
1.
Doherty, David
2022.
What Can Conjoint Experiments Tell Us about Americans’ Abortion Attitudes?.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 2,
p.
147.
Kubo, Yoshiaki
and
Okada, Isamu
2022.
COVID-19 health certification reduces outgroup bias: evidence from a conjoint experiment in Japan.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
FREDERIKSEN, KRISTIAN VREDE SKAANING
2022.
Does Competence Make Citizens Tolerate Undemocratic Behavior?.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 116,
Issue. 3,
p.
1147.
Farkas, Attila
Kovarek, Daniel
and
Farkas, Eszter
2022.
Last Place Aversion, Labor Market Competition or Welfare State Model? Explaining Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in Hungary with a Conjoint Experiment.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Abramson, Scott F.
Kocak, Korhan
and
Magazinnik, Asya
2022.
What Do We Learn about Voter Preferences from Conjoint Experiments?.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 4,
p.
1008.
Carnahan, Dustin
Ulusoy, Ezgi
Barry, Rachel
McGraw, Johnny
Virtue, Isabel
and
Bergan, Daniel E
2022.
What should I believe? A conjoint analysis of the influence of message characteristics on belief in, perceived credibility of, and intent to share political posts.
Journal of Communication,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 5,
p.
592.
Heinrich, Tobias
and
Witko, Christopher
2022.
Technology Threats to Employment, Issues, and Candidate and Party Preferences in the United States.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 75,
Issue. 3,
p.
797.
Ne’eman, Ari
Bell, Elizabeth
Schneider, Monica C.
and
Strolovitch, Dara
2022.
Identifying And Exploring Bias In Public Opinion On Scarce Resource Allocation During The COVID-19 Pandemic.
Health Affairs,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 10,
p.
1513.
Eshima, Shusei
Horiuchi, Yusaku
Kuriwaki, Shiro
and
Smith, Daniel M.
2023.
Winning Elections with Unpopular Policies: Valence Advantage and Single-Party Dominance in Japan.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Titelman, Noam
2023.
Class, Ethnicity, Age or Education: What Characteristics Determine Citizens' Sense of Political Commonality?.
British Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 2,
p.
806.
Miwa, Hirofumi
Arami, Reiko
and
Taniguchi, Masaki
2023.
Detecting Voter Understanding of Ideological Labels Using a Conjoint Experiment.
Political Behavior,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 2,
p.
635.
Ganter, Flavien
2023.
Identification of Preferences in Forced-Choice Conjoint Experiments: Reassessing the Quantity of Interest.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 1,
p.
98.
Bergan, Daniel E.
Finerty, Caitlin
Harrison, Jack
Ma, Siyuan
and
Virtue, Isabel
2023.
Can People Use Party Cues to Assess Policymaker Positions? Ecological Rationality and Political Heuristics.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 76,
Issue. 3,
p.
1502.
Blackwell, Matthew
and
Pashley, Nicole E.
2023.
Noncompliance and Instrumental Variables for 2
K
Factorial Experiments
.
Journal of the American Statistical Association,
Vol. 118,
Issue. 542,
p.
1102.
Frederiksen, Kristian Vrede Skaaning
and
Skaaning, Svend-Erik
2023.
Do Citizens Tolerate Antidemocratic Statements?.
Electoral Studies,
Vol. 84,
Issue. ,
p.
102652.