Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Ward, Peter
and
Denney, Steven
2022.
Welfare chauvinism among co‐ethnics: Evidence from a conjoint experiment in South Korea.
International Migration,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 5,
p.
74.
Farkas, Attila
Kovarek, Daniel
and
Farkas, Eszter
2022.
Last Place Aversion, Labor Market Competition or Welfare State Model? Explaining Anti-Immigrant Sentiment in Hungary with a Conjoint Experiment.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Heinrich, Tobias
and
Witko, Christopher
2022.
Technology Threats to Employment, Issues, and Candidate and Party Preferences in the United States.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 75,
Issue. 3,
p.
797.
FREDERIKSEN, KRISTIAN VREDE SKAANING
2022.
Does Competence Make Citizens Tolerate Undemocratic Behavior?.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 116,
Issue. 3,
p.
1147.
Zhao, Anqi
and
Ding, Peng
2022.
Regression-based causal inference with factorial experiments: estimands, model specifications and design-based properties.
Biometrika,
Vol. 109,
Issue. 3,
p.
799.
Doherty, David
2022.
What Can Conjoint Experiments Tell Us about Americans’ Abortion Attitudes?.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 2,
p.
147.
Carnahan, Dustin
Ulusoy, Ezgi
Barry, Rachel
McGraw, Johnny
Virtue, Isabel
and
Bergan, Daniel E
2022.
What should I believe? A conjoint analysis of the influence of message characteristics on belief in, perceived credibility of, and intent to share political posts.
Journal of Communication,
Vol. 72,
Issue. 5,
p.
592.
Ne’eman, Ari
Bell, Elizabeth
Schneider, Monica C.
and
Strolovitch, Dara
2022.
Identifying And Exploring Bias In Public Opinion On Scarce Resource Allocation During The COVID-19 Pandemic.
Health Affairs,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 10,
p.
1513.
Abramson, Scott F.
Kocak, Korhan
and
Magazinnik, Asya
2022.
What Do We Learn about Voter Preferences from Conjoint Experiments?.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 66,
Issue. 4,
p.
1008.
Kubo, Yoshiaki
and
Okada, Isamu
2022.
COVID-19 health certification reduces outgroup bias: evidence from a conjoint experiment in Japan.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 1,
Levatino, Antonina
2022.
What do exchange students value when choosing a destination for their study period abroad? A conjoint experiment.
Globalisation, Societies and Education,
p.
1.
Tanaka, Ayumu
Ito, Banri
and
Jinji, Naoto
2022.
Individual Preferences Toward Inward Foreign Direct Investment: A Conjoint Survey Experiment.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Harris, Adam S.
and
Honig, Lauren
2023.
Mutual Dependence and Expectations of Cooperation.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 85,
Issue. 1,
p.
192.
Esaiasson, Peter
Arnesen, Sveinung
and
Werner, Hannah
2023.
How to be Gracious about Political Loss—The Importance of Good Loser Messages in Policy Controversies.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 5,
p.
599.
FERREE, KAREN E.
HONIG, LAUREN
LUST, ELLEN
and
PHILLIPS, MELANIE L.
2023.
Land and Legibility: When Do Citizens Expect Secure Property Rights in Weak States?.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 117,
Issue. 1,
p.
42.
Bergan, Daniel E.
Finerty, Caitlin
Harrison, Jack
Ma, Siyuan
and
Virtue, Isabel
2023.
Can People Use Party Cues to Assess Policymaker Positions? Ecological Rationality and Political Heuristics.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 76,
Issue. 3,
p.
1502.
Queirolo, Rosario
Repetto, Lorena
Sotto, Belén
and
Álvarez, Eliana
2023.
Explaining the Impact of Legal Access to Cannabis on Attitudes toward Users.
International Journal of Public Opinion Research,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 2,
Pashley, Nicole E.
and
Bind, Marie‐Abèle C.
2023.
Causal inference for multiple treatments using fractional factorial designs.
Canadian Journal of Statistics,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 2,
p.
444.
Titelman, Noam
2023.
Class, Ethnicity, Age or Education: What Characteristics Determine Citizens' Sense of Political Commonality?.
British Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 53,
Issue. 2,
p.
806.
Bansak, Kirk
Hainmueller, Jens
Hopkins, Daniel J.
and
Yamamoto, Teppei
2023.
Using Conjoint Experiments to Analyze Election Outcomes: The Essential Role of the Average Marginal Component Effect.
Political Analysis,
Vol. 31,
Issue. 4,
p.
500.