Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:33:06.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finding Jumps in Otherwise Smooth Curves: Identifying Critical Events in Political Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Marc T. Ratkovic  and
Kevin H. Eng
Marc T. Ratkovic*
Affiliation:
Departments of Political Science and Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 110 North Hall, 1050 Bascom Mall, Madison, WI 53706
Kevin H. Eng
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1300 University Ave., Madison, WI 53706
*
e-mail: [email protected] (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many social processes are stable and smooth in general, with discrete jumps. We develop a sequential segmentation spline method that can identify both the location and the number of discontinuities in a series of observations with a time component, while fitting a smooth spline between jumps, using a modified Bayesian Information Criterion statistic as a stopping rule. We explore the method in a large-n, unbalanced panel setting with George W. Bush's approval data, a small-n time series with median DW-NOMINATE scores for each Congress over time, and a series of simulations. We compare the method to several extant smoothers, and the method performs favorably in terms of visual inspection, residual properties, and event detection. Finally, we discuss extensions of the method.

Type
Research Article
Information
Political Analysis , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , Winter 2010 , pp. 57 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Political Methodology 

Footnotes

Authors's note: We thank Charles Franklin for providing the presidential approval data and for many useful conversations. We thank Grace Wahba, participants in the University of Wisconsin-Madison's Models and Data Seminar, Sample Survey Seminar, and Fitting Curves to Data Seminar for many useful comments. Replication materials and relevant code are available on the Political Analysis Web site.

References

Beck, Nathaniel, and Jackman, Simon. 1997. Beyond linearity by default: generalized additive models. American Journal of Political Science 42: 596–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Nathaniel, Jackman, Simon, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Presidential approval: the case of George W. Bush. Working paper.Google Scholar
Calderia, Gregory A., and Zorn, Christopher J. W. 1998. Of time and consensual norms in the supreme court. American Journal of Political Science 42: 874–902.Google Scholar
Cleveland, William S. 1979. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 829–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, Bradley, Hastie, Trevor, Johnstone, Iain, and Tibshirani, Robert. 2004. Least angle regression. Annals of Statistics 32: 407–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael, and Stimson, James A. 2002. The macro polity. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, P. J. 1995. Reversible jump MCMC computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82: 711–32.Google Scholar
Gu, Chong. 2002. Smoothing spline ANOVA models. Springer Series in Statistics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Keele, Luke. 2006. How to be smooth: automated smoothing in political science. Unpublished Manuscript, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Keele, Luke. 2008. Semiparametric regression for the social sciences. London: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. 1955. A theory of critical elections. The Journal of Politics 17: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. 1959. Secular realignment and the party system. The Journal of Politics 21: 198–210.Google Scholar
Krivobokova, Tatyana, and Kauermann, G.öran. 2007. A note on penalized spline smoothing with correlated errors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 102: 1328–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, David. 2003. Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 2002. Electoral realignments: a critique of an American genre. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, Nathan D., and Wand, Matthew P. 2006. Penalized splines and reproducing kernel methods. The American Statistician 60: 233–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in time: history, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: a political-economic history of roll call voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raftery, Adrian. 1995. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology 25: 111–63.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Sen, Ashish, and Srivastava, Muni. 1975. On tests for detecting the change in the mean. The Annals of Statistics 3: 98–108.Google Scholar
Spirling, Arthur. 2007a. Bayesian approaches for limited dependent variable change point problems. Political Analysis 15: 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spirling, Arthur. 2007b. Turning points in the Iraq conflict: reversible jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo in political science. The American Statistician 61: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, Luke, and Kadane, Joseph. 1986. Accurate approximations for posterior moments and marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 82–6.Google Scholar
Wahba, Grace. 1990. Spline models for observation data. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Western, Bruce, and Kleykamp, Meredith. 2004. A Bayesian change point model for historical time series analysis. Political Analysis 12: 354–74.Google Scholar